Cr.FA study materials
Cr.FA study resources

Cr.FA: Quantitative Methods and Financial Modeling

Cr.FA · Work through your exam, one topic at a time.

All guide sections

Quantitative Methods and Financial Modeling

Domain 3 - Quantitative Methods and Financial Modeling

This domain tests time value of money, descriptive statistics, probability, sampling, hypothesis testing, and regression. Modeling questions often ask you to interpret a coefficient or decide whether a result is statistically significant, not merely to compute a number.

Core rules

  • Time value: PV = FV / (1 + r)^n. For annuities, use the annuity factor; for perpetuities, PV = cash flow / r. Match the rate and period conventions.
  • Hypothesis testing: State the null and alternative, choose the significance level, compute the test statistic, and compare it with the critical value or p-value.
  • Regression: The slope measures the expected change in the dependent variable for a one-unit change in the independent variable, holding other regressors constant. The t-statistic tests whether a coefficient differs from zero.
  • R-squared: The proportion of variation in the dependent variable explained by the model; it does not prove causation.
  • Model risk: Heteroskedasticity, serial correlation, multicollinearity, and data snooping can invalidate inference.

Worked example

A sample of 36 observations has a mean of 52 and a sample standard deviation of 12. Test whether the population mean differs from 50 at the 5% level. The standard error is 12 / sqrt(36) = 2. The t-statistic is (52 - 50) / 2 = 1.00 with 35 degrees of freedom. The two-tailed 5% critical value is about 2.03. Because 1.00 is less than 2.03, fail to reject the null. The p-value is roughly 0.32, so the evidence is not statistically significant at 5%. Note that the economic size of the difference may still matter; statistical insignificance is not the same as no effect.

Traps that cost marks

  • Using a one-tailed critical value for a two-tailed test.
  • Confusing the standard deviation of the sample with the standard error of the mean.
  • Interpreting R-squared as proof that one variable causes another.
  • Ignoring heteroskedasticity when reading standard errors.
  • Mixing arithmetic and geometric returns when evaluating past performance.