Three Symptoms in a Festival-Bound Wind Ensemble
You conduct a 58-member high school wind ensemble. Festival is in three weeks, and the program includes a 6/8 march felt in two at quarter note equals 120 and a slow chorale. Three problems recur in rehearsal. The 14 clarinets enter the march's second strain a half beat early nearly every time. The trumpets play at mezzo-forte even in passages marked pianissimo. Over 32 bars the ensemble's tempo creeps up roughly 8 bpm. Rehearsals are 45 minutes, three times a week, and you have a student teacher observing who asks whether these are conducting problems or player problems. Sectionals are available but only twice before the festival.
1. Analyze the three symptoms and argue whether they share a common cause.
Read the worked answer
They are different surface failures with one underlying deficit: the ensemble has no shared internal pulse and no shared dynamic reference, so everyone is following the stick rather than each other.
The clarinet early entry is almost certainly a subdivision and preparation problem. The second strain's syncopation pulls the ear toward a re-barred feel, and players who are counting the bar in six rather than feeling it in two will arrive early on the same cue every time. The trumpets are not defying a dynamic marking; they likely cannot hear that they are loud, and no one has given them a reference for what pianissimo sounds like in that room. The tempo creep is the clearest evidence of the shared-cause hypothesis: if the ensemble were anchored to a common pulse, the drift would not accumulate so consistently over exactly the same 32 bars.
Treating these as three separate problems produces three patches. Treating them as one listening problem produces one fix with three symptoms.
2. What would you change in your gesture and in the rehearsal sequence for the next two rehearsals?
Read the worked answer
Gesture first, because you may be part of the drift. Conduct the 6/8 in two with a low, clear rebound and a preparatory beat that shows the syncopated entry rather than the downbeat alone; subdivide visibly for one or two passes and then return to two so the players do not become dependent on the subdivision. Record yourself and check whether your own tempo is stable, since conductors often accelerate into exciting passages and blame the ensemble.
Rehearsal sequence: begin with body percussion and counting in two, then transfer the figure to a single pitch in the clarinets, then restore the full texture. For the trumpets, run the chorale at pianissimo and ask the section to identify the loudest player; the goal is an internal reference, not compliance. Then run the march's 32 bars at a slow tempo with a visible metronome for one week, and remove it before the second sectional.
Use the two sectionals for clarinet subdivision and trumpet dynamics respectively, not for the full ensemble.
3. How would you measure whether the interventions worked, and what would you do if the data say they did not?
Read the worked answer
Set criteria before you start, so the judgment is not made by feel in the last week. Record the same 32 bars at every rehearsal and note the tempo at bar 1 and bar 32; a drift of 2 bpm or less counts as fixed. Count early clarinet entries per run, with a target of zero across three consecutive runs. For dynamics, have the student teacher stand at the back of the hall and rate the trumpet pianissimo on a three-point scale, since your position at the podium is the worst place to judge balance.
If week two data are flat, change the intervention rather than repeating it louder. The likely failure modes are that the metronome became a crutch and the ensemble never internalized the pulse, or that the early entry is a breath-preparation problem rather than a counting problem, in which case the fix is an added preparatory gesture, not more counting. If progress is partial by the final week, make a programming or tempo decision deliberately rather than hoping the performance will be different from the rehearsal.