Practice Scores and the Delayed Test
A fictional school study compares two ways of practicing a target throw. Twelve learners repeat the same target during every practice block. Twelve other learners alternate among three target distances. Both groups receive the same total number of attempts and the same rest opportunities. On the final practice day, the repeated-target group scores more successful throws. One week later, both groups are tested without coach feedback on the original target and on a new distance. The teacher supplies mean scores showing similar original-target retention but better new-distance performance in the varied group. Learners were allocated by existing class rather than randomly. The task is to interpret what the measurements support and what they leave uncertain, rather than choose a universally best training schedule.
1. Which result is most relevant to transfer, and why is the practice score insufficient?
Read the worked answer
The new-distance test examines transfer to a changed task condition. Immediate practice performance can include temporary support or familiarity, so it is not sufficient evidence of durable learning. Similar retention and different transfer can occur because the tests ask different questions.
2. Name a design limitation and an improvement.
Read the worked answer
Existing classes may differ in prior experience or other characteristics, so allocation can confound the comparison. Record baseline skill, standardize test conditions and consider random allocation where feasible. A larger or better-controlled study would support a stronger inference without guaranteeing the same result in every task.