CT Elevator Mechanic study materials
CT Elevator Mechanic study resources

One rope and one valve are mistaken for complete protection

CT Elevator Mechanic · Put your knowledge to work in context.

All case studies

One rope and one valve are mistaken for complete protection

A fictional elevator review lists several suspension ropes and a hydraulic equipment diagram from a different installation. A trainee concludes that every rope can independently carry the entire rated load and that any check valve is a complete safeguard against a ruptured line. Another person treats a brake, governor and buffer as interchangeable names. The actual design, equipment ratings and protection functions have not been established. No elevator is moved, no valve is operated and no person enters a hoistway in this exercise. Explain which assumptions are unsupported and identify the need to follow the actual load path, distinguish functions and obtain the competent manufacturer and applicable-code basis before making a real technical conclusion.

1. Which rope claim is unsupported?

Read the worked answer

The number of ropes does not establish that each individual one is rated to carry the full actual load independently.

2. Why is a check-valve label insufficient?

Read the worked answer

Its actual directional function is distinct from specified rupture or velocity protection; assess the complete approved arrangement.