CT Funeral Juris study materials
CT Funeral Juris study resources

An uncertain approval in a completed file

CT Funeral Juris · Put your knowledge to work in context.

All case studies

An uncertain approval in a completed file

A fictional Connecticut funeral home reviews a preparation file after relatives disagree about what was authorized. The record contains a draft form and a note that a conversation was attempted, but it does not establish that the required person gave the disputed approval. An employee suggests importing a signature image from an unrelated form and dating it before the preparation. The manager says that a complete-looking file will prevent complaints and that consent probably would have been granted. Original messages remain available. Students must distinguish a factual correction from fabrication, preserve the unresolved approval question and identify the need for the actual legal authorization process rather than treat a hypothetical willingness as proof of past consent or provide a legal verdict on facts not supplied.

1. Why is the proposed signature improper?

Read the worked answer

It would falsely represent actual approval and chronology. A likely preference is not evidence that the required person consented at the required time.

2. What should the review preserve?

Read the worked answer

Retain the original record, mark uncertainty honestly and follow the proper reporting and clarification process. A supported correction must remain accurate and auditable.