CT Land Surveyor study materials
CT Land Surveyor study resources

CT Land Surveyor: Boundary Surveying and Retracement

CT Land Surveyor · Work through your exam, one topic at a time.

All guide sections

Boundary Surveying and Retracement

Retracement is the central act of Connecticut boundary practice: rebuilding a parcel as it was originally created rather than inventing new lines. The exam probes the hierarchy of boundary evidence, how courts weigh monuments against deed numbers, and whether you can defend an opinion in writing.

The hierarchy of evidence

  • Natural monuments (the sea, a river, a ledge, an ancient tree) outrank artificial monuments.
  • Artificial monuments - stone bounds, drill holes, pins set by the original surveyor, a wall built as a bound - outrank courses and distances.
  • Courses and distances outrank area; area settles only residual ambiguity.
  • Calls to adjoiners (to land of Smith) carry great weight and often control over distance.
  • Proportionate measure is the last resort, applied when a monument is lost, distributing excess or deficiency among the original calls in proportion to their lengths.

Connecticut texture

Deeds here are metes and bounds; there is no federal rectangular system. Colonial highway layouts, town landing places, stone walls and tidal shorelines are frequent controlling calls. Adverse possession runs fifteen years under Conn. Gen. Stat. § 52-575, and long-acquiesced practical locations can bind parties who never recorded an agreement.

Worked example

A deed reads 'N 10° E, 200.00 feet along the stone wall to a white oak stump.' You find the wall and the rotted stump, flanked by original stone bounds, at 197.50 ft. The monument controls, so the corner is held there. Intermediate calls on that line are scaled by 197.50/200.00 = 0.9875, so a 100.00-ft call becomes 98.75 ft. Had the stump vanished with no reliable evidence of its position, the 200.00-ft distance would govern, measured from the known point.

Traps that cost marks

  • Moving a found monument to match the deed distance.
  • Treating an occupancy fence as a boundary without adverse possession or agreement evidence.
  • Retracing only the subject deed and ignoring the chain, adjoiners and filed maps.
  • Letting a junior description take land already conveyed by a senior deed.
  • Writing an opinion that hides the discrepancy instead of documenting it.