Elaine's Roof: Withdrawal, 1035 Exchange, or Single Premium Life
Elaine, 71, bought a nonqualified deferred annuity in 2012 with a single $75,000 payment. It is now worth $120,000; she has never annuitized and has taken no withdrawals. She needs $30,000 for a new roof. Her agent offers three routes: (a) withdraw $30,000 from the existing contract; (b) make a 1035 exchange into a new annuity with lower mortality and expense charges but a fresh 10-year surrender schedule, then withdraw $30,000; or (c) surrender the annuity and use the proceeds toward a $250,000 single premium whole life policy. Elaine is married, is in the 24% federal bracket, and expects to need this money for living expenses within about five years. She has no other annuity or life insurance.
1. Calculate the federal income tax on option (a) and on a full surrender. Which produces less taxable income this year, and what remains inside the contract afterward?
Read the worked answer
Baseline. Value $120,000; basis (investment in the contract) $75,000; total unrealized gain $45,000.
Option (a) - $30,000 partial withdrawal. Nonqualified annuity withdrawals are taxed gain-first (LIFO). The entire $30,000 comes out of the $45,000 of gain, so:
- Taxable income this year: $30,000 (federal tax at 24% ≈ $7,200, plus Connecticut income tax, which also treats the gain as ordinary income).
- Remaining contract value: $90,000. Remaining gain: $15,000. Basis stays at $75,000.
- The next $15,000 she withdraws is fully taxable; after that, withdrawals are a return of basis until the $75,000 is exhausted.
Full surrender. All $45,000 of gain is recognized → roughly $10,800 of federal tax.
No 10% penalty. The 10% additional tax on early distributions applies before age 59½; Elaine is 71, so it does not apply to either route.
Conclusion. The $30,000 withdrawal recognizes $15,000 less taxable income this year and leaves the rest of the contract deferring. There is no way to take $30,000 out of this contract tax-free - LIFO guarantees the gain comes out first.
2. Is the 1035 exchange in option (b) taxable, what carries over, and what non-tax costs should Elaine weigh before signing?
Read the worked answer
Tax treatment. An annuity-to-annuity 1035 exchange is not a taxable event. No gain is recognized, and Elaine's $75,000 basis carries over to the new contract. Her eventual tax position is identical: $120,000 of value against $75,000 of basis, so $45,000 of gain is still embedded and will come out gain-first.
What she actually gains: marginally lower mortality and expense charges.
What she actually gives up:
- A fresh 10-year surrender schedule on a 71-year-old who says she will need the money in about five years. A 1035 exchange does not escape surrender charges - it resets them. If she exchanges and then withdraws $30,000 next year, she may pay a surrender charge on top of the income tax.
- Any free-withdrawal privilege and any higher death benefit or guaranteed minimum accumulation value built into the 2012 contract.
- Older contracts frequently carry richer living and death benefit guarantees that cannot be repurchased today.
Judgment. The exchange is tax-neutral, so the decision turns entirely on contract mechanics. Given a stated five-year liquidity horizon and lower fees of unclear magnitude, the better recommendation is to withdraw from the existing contract and preserve the 2012 guarantees - or to exchange only into a contract with a short surrender schedule and a free-withdrawal window that covers her need.
3. Evaluate option (c). What tax character does the converted money take, and what makes this a poor fit for Elaine specifically?
Read the worked answer
It is permitted but rarely the right answer here. Section 1035 does allow an annuity-to-life-insurance exchange, so no gain is recognized at the exchange. The annuity's $75,000 basis carries over into the life policy.
The MEC problem. A single premium whole life policy is a modified endowment contract. Inside a MEC:
- Withdrawals and policy loans are taxed gain-first and can trigger the 10% penalty before 59½; and
- Loans, assignments, and pledges are treated as distributions - a "loan" from a MEC can generate taxable income even though the client never receives a check.
The liquidity problem. Elaine needs $30,000 for a roof now and expects to draw on these assets for living expenses within five years. A $250,000 single premium policy locks the money into an illiquid contract with surrender charges, and the gain embedded in it is still taxable if she later surrenders or borrows.
The one genuine advantage. The death benefit of a MEC is still received income-tax-free, so if Elaine truly never needs the money, the $45,000 of deferred annuity gain would eventually pass to her beneficiaries free of income tax - a meaningful benefit, but one that only pays off at death.
Conclusion. The tax deferral is not the deciding factor; suitability is. The recommendation should match the money to the need: keep it liquid, take the $30,000 withdrawal under option (a), and revisit permanent coverage only with funds she does not need for income.