Occupancy Certification When the Borrower Plans to Rent to a Relative
On July 1, a loan officer preapproves a borrower for a $380,000 owner-occupied conventional loan with 5% down at 6.25%. The borrower is purchasing a two-unit property. On July 15, the borrower texts: “My brother will rent both units for 18 months while I save money and live with my parents. I’ll move into one unit after that. Please keep it as owner-occupied so I get the lower rate and the 5% down payment.” The loan officer knows the borrower’s parents’ address is 30 miles away and the borrower currently rents an apartment. The processor has already ordered an appraisal as owner-occupied. The borrower asks the loan officer to “just sign the occupancy certification; everyone does it.”
1. Is this loan owner-occupied based on the borrower’s stated plan? What should the loan officer do?
Read the worked answer
No. Owner-occupied treatment generally requires the borrower to intend to occupy the property as a principal residence within 60 days of closing and to continue occupying it for at least one year, absent documented extenuating circumstances. The borrower’s stated plan is to live with parents and rent both units to a brother for 18 months. That is an investment-use plan, not a principal-residence plan. The loan officer must not sign or submit an occupancy certification that contradicts the borrower’s own statements. The loan officer should stop the owner-occupied processing, correct the appraisal order if the occupancy classification is wrong, and discuss the file with underwriting and compliance. The loan officer should not treat the borrower’s future intention to move in after 18 months as satisfying the current occupancy requirement.
2. What options should the loan officer present if the borrower still wants to rent both units to the brother?
Read the worked answer
The loan officer should explain that the file would need to be re-underwritten as an investment property. That typically means a higher interest rate, a larger down payment, different reserve requirements, and possibly different appraisal or property-condition requirements. The loan officer should not simply change the occupancy label while keeping the owner-occupied pricing. If the borrower cannot qualify as an investment property, the loan officer should decline the file rather than submit inaccurate information. If the borrower genuinely intends to occupy one unit within 60 days and rent the other, that is a different scenario, but the loan officer would need to document the intent and confirm that the program permits the arrangement. The loan officer should give the borrower accurate options, not pressure the borrower to sign a false certification.
3. What are the consequences if the loan officer signs the occupancy certification anyway and the loan closes as owner-occupied?
Read the worked answer
Signing a false occupancy certification is mortgage fraud. The loan officer would be making a material misrepresentation about the borrower’s intent to occupy, which affects pricing, down payment, and eligibility. Consequences can include license discipline in Connecticut, civil liability, repurchase demands against the lender, investor losses, and criminal exposure. The borrower could also face fraud liability. The fact that “everyone does it” is not a defense. The loan officer’s duty is to document the borrower’s actual intent and to submit accurate information, even if that means losing the loan. If the loan officer is pressured by a supervisor or borrower, the loan officer should escalate the issue to compliance and document the pressure.