The Rio Claro Landfill and the Missing Collection Days
Rio Claro has 12,400 residents. The waste contractor is paid to collect twice weekly, but some neighbourhoods have had one collection in three weeks. Forty informal recyclers work at the landfill, which sits 600 metres upstream of the town water intake. Leachate is visible in a drain after rain. Dengue cases rose from 5 to 27 in one month, and the clinic reports more skin infections among children near the dump. The council has three options: privatise collection with stricter penalties, raise fees to fund more trucks, or start community composting and recycling. The annual waste budget is $480,000; privatisation is estimated at $560,000, fee increases would raise $90,000, and a composting pilot would cost $70,000. Residents say they cannot afford higher fees. The contractor blames blocked access roads.
1. What evidence should the council gather before choosing between privatising collection, raising fees, and starting community composting? Explain how each piece could change the choice.
Read the worked answer
Evidence needed: (1) collection records by neighbourhood and date, to verify the contractor's performance and whether access roads are truly blocked; (2) waste composition, to see how much is compostable or recyclable; (3) water sample results at the intake, to establish leachate risk; (4) dengue larval survey and clinic data by area, to locate the health burden; (5) household willingness and ability to pay, to test the fee option; (6) recycler numbers and income, to predict livelihood effects; (7) costed fleet and route plan, to test the privatisation estimate.
How it changes the choice: if missed collections cluster on blocked roads, enforcement and route redesign may be cheaper than privatisation. If waste is 40% organic, composting reduces landfill volume quickly. If the water intake is contaminated, public health urgency outweighs fee concerns. If recyclers depend on landfill access, privatisation needs a transition plan. Evidence should match the option's main risk.
2. Recommend a package of two measures and justify it using public health and environmental justice.
Read the worked answer
Recommended package: (1) enforce the existing contract with penalties and publish collection performance by area; (2) fund a 12-month community composting pilot in the two worst-served neighbourhoods, linked to the 40 recyclers; (3) keep fees unchanged for now and recover savings from reduced landfill haulage.
Justification: public health is urgent - dengue rose fivefold and children near the dump have skin infections - so collection must improve immediately. Environmental justice matters because the landfill sits upstream of the water intake and residents cannot afford higher fees. Privatisation alone may improve trucks but exclude recyclers and still cost $80,000 more than budget. Composting is cheap at $70,000 and cuts organic waste. Enforcement targets the contractor's failure without shifting costs to poor households. The package addresses cause, cost, and equity.
3. The informal recyclers say a privatised collection system will cut their supply. How should the council include them?
Read the worked answer
Include recyclers as partners, not obstacles. First, register the 40 recyclers and consult them before changing access rules. Second, designate a sorting and buy-back area at the landfill or a transfer station, with weighing and a published price for metals, plastics, and cardboard. Third, require any privatised collection contractor to subcontract recyclable collection to registered groups in specified zones. Fourth, provide gloves, boots, and tetanus shots, and connect workers to health services. Fifth, fund a transition period if their supply falls. This protects livelihoods, improves recycling rates, and reduces the risk that a privatised system pushes informal workers into unsafe scavenging. The council should monitor incomes, not just tonnage.