Pafos Hospitality: going concern, covenant waiver and subsequent customer liquidation
Pafos Hospitality Group Ltd operates three hotels and has a 31 December 2024 year end. Draft accounts show revenue €18.4 million, a net loss of €2.1 million and net liabilities of €3.2 million. A €5 million bank loan is due on 30 June 2025. At 31 December 2024 the debt service covenant was breached (DSCR 1.10 against a required 1.25). The bank granted a waiver on 15 February 2025, conditional on a 2025 business plan and a 2% interest margin increase; the audit report is due 20 March 2025. Management's cash flow forecast shows positive cash for 12 months only if revenue grows 15% and a €1.2 million shareholder loan is not repaid; the shareholder has provided a non-binding letter of intent. The audit team set materiality at €250,000. Unadjusted misstatements total €310,000, mainly revenue cut-off; inventory NRV is overstated by €180,000 and management refuses to adjust both. On 5 March 2025 a customer representing 22% of revenue entered liquidation, owing €600,000 at year end.
1. Evaluate the going concern assumption and the effect on the audit report.
Read the worked answer
ISA 570 indicators are present: net liabilities, a net loss, a €5 million loan maturing within 12 months, a covenant breach at the reporting date, and a forecast that depends on 15% revenue growth and non-repayment of a shareholder loan. The shareholder letter is not binding, so it is weak evidence. The waiver is conditional, obtained after year end, and does not remove the loan's maturity. The March customer liquidation further stresses the forecast.
The auditor is likely to conclude that a material uncertainty exists. If management's going concern disclosure is adequate, the opinion is unmodified but the report includes a separate 'Material Uncertainty Related to Going Concern' section. If disclosure is inadequate, the opinion is qualified or adverse depending on pervasiveness. If the auditor concludes that the going concern basis is not appropriate, the opinion is adverse. The auditor should obtain the bank waiver, the business plan, sensitivity analysis and confirmation of the shareholder's ability and intention to support; the forecast assumptions must be challenged, not merely accepted.
2. How should the 5 March customer liquidation and the 15 February covenant waiver be treated under IAS 10 and ISA 560?
Read the worked answer
Customer liquidation: the event occurred after the reporting date, so it is prima facie non-adjusting. However, if the liquidation confirms that the customer was already in financial difficulty at 31 December 2024, the €600,000 receivable should be adjusted for expected credit loss under IFRS 9. The auditor should inspect pre-year-end correspondence, credit reports, payment history and the liquidator's statement to decide whether the condition existed at year end. If it is non-adjusting, disclosure may still be needed because the loss is material.
Covenant waiver: the breach existed at 31 December 2024, but the waiver was obtained on 15 February 2025. The waiver is relevant to the classification and disclosure of the loan and to going concern. It does not change the fact that the loan matures on 30 June 2025 and is current at year end. The auditor should obtain the signed waiver, confirm whether it is unconditional and whether it covers the 12 months from the approval date, and consider whether the condition was resolved before the financial statements were approved. ISA 560 requires the auditor to consider events up to the date of the auditor's report and to respond if facts become known after that date.
3. Given the unadjusted misstatements, what opinion should be issued and how does the going concern conclusion interact with it?
Read the worked answer
Materiality is €250,000. Unadjusted misstatements are €310,000 plus the €180,000 inventory NRV overstatement, totalling €490,000. This is material but not pervasive because it affects specific balances and disclosures rather than the financial statements as a whole. If management refuses to correct them, the auditor should issue a qualified 'except for' opinion.
The going concern conclusion is separate. If a material uncertainty is adequately disclosed, the report includes the material uncertainty section but the opinion can still be qualified for the misstatements. If going concern disclosure is inadequate, the opinion is qualified or adverse, and the misstatement qualification may be subsumed into the more severe conclusion. If the going concern basis is inappropriate, an adverse opinion is required regardless of the €490,000 misstatements. The auditor must communicate the uncorrected misstatements and the going concern findings to those charged with governance and document the basis for the judgement.