Greek argument: a promising pilot is not universal proof
Consider this original Greek passage: «Στην πιλοτική λειτουργία δύο γραφείων ο μέσος χρόνος εξυπηρέτησης μειώθηκε. Οι εργαζόμενοι είχαν λάβει ειδική κατάρτιση και οι υποθέσεις ήταν απλούστερες από εκείνες άλλων γραφείων. Το αποτέλεσμα είναι ενθαρρυντικό, ωστόσο δεν αποδεικνύει ότι το ίδιο όφελος θα εμφανιστεί παντού. Προτείνεται επέκταση της δοκιμής και σύγκριση παρόμοιων υποθέσεων πριν από γενική εφαρμογή». A candidate chooses the headline “The new process guarantees faster service in every office.” Another says the reservation means the pilot achieved nothing. Both readers notice the topic but lose the degree of certainty and the stated comparison limits. The passage supplies no individual waiting times and no measurements from other offices. Treat the offices and trial as fictional. Evaluate only what the Greek wording supports, rather than deciding whether a real administrative reform should be adopted.
1. Identify the position actually defended and explain why both candidates overstate it.
Read the worked answer
The passage reports a promising improvement in two trial offices and recommends broader testing with comparable cases. A universal guarantee goes beyond the sample and ignores training and case complexity. Saying the pilot achieved nothing also contradicts the reported decrease and the word ενθαρρυντικό.
2. Explain the function of ωστόσο and identify one further comparison that would strengthen an evaluation.
Read the worked answer
Ωστόσο introduces a reservation about generalization without cancelling the observed result. Comparing similarly complex cases in offices with comparable training would address two differences expressly noted in the passage. The text does not establish that these comparisons will confirm or refute the benefit.