I85PREP
⌘ K
Czech Forensic Expert Entry Exam study materials
Czech Forensic Expert Entry Exam study resources

Czech Forensic Expert Entry Exam practice questions

One question at a time. Build your Czech Forensic Expert Entry Exam understanding.

First 50 of 190 questions. Each one lists the choices, the correct answer, and an explanation. The checker at the top of this page saves progress in this browser when it is available.

Continue in the practice tool above to load more questions, 50 at a time.

Question 1Integrated role knowledge and Czech legal background

Under Sections 5(1)(a) and 8(1)(b) of the Czech Experts Act (Act No. 254/2019 Sb.), which of the following forms part of an individual's required professional competence for entry in the Register of Experts (Seznam znalců)?

  1. At least 5 years of active professional practice in the relevant field of expertise Correct answer.
  2. Prior appointment as a sworn translator or certified judicial clerk
  3. Completion of a post-doctoral habilitation degree in the requested field
  4. At least 10 years of experience serving as an in-house corporate legal advisor

Explanation

Section 5(1)(a) requires professional competence, and Section 8(1)(b) normally includes at least five years of active professional practice focused on the requested field and branch. Section 8(5) permits the Ministry to waive certain Section 8(1) conditions in justified cases when the remaining qualifications adequately guarantee professional performance.

Question 2Integrated role knowledge and Czech legal background

What insurance rule applies to an individual expert (znalec-fyzická osoba) from 1 January 2026?

  1. The individual must maintain a CZK 500,000 statutory policy
  2. Mandatory insurance for individual experts was abolished; an individual may insure voluntarily, while expert offices and institutes remain subject to Section 22 Correct answer.
  3. The Ministry automatically insures every individual expert
  4. Insurance is prohibited for individuals

Explanation

The amendment effective 1 January 2026 abolished the public-law duty for an individual expert to maintain liability insurance. Expert offices and expert institutes remain subject to Section 22 insurance, and an individual expert may still purchase coverage voluntarily and enter its details in the register.

Question 3Integrated role knowledge and Czech legal background

What may an individual expert do after voluntarily arranging liability insurance under the rules effective in 2026?

  1. Demand that the Ministry reimburse the premium
  2. Treat the policy as replacing professional-care duties
  3. Enter the insurer, coverage period, and indemnity limit as optional register data and keep those data accurate Correct answer.
  4. Use the policy to expand into unregistered specializations

Explanation

From 2026, individual insurance is voluntary. An individual who obtains it may personally enter the insurer, coverage period, and indemnity limit as optional register data and is responsible for keeping that entry correct and current.

Question 4Integrated role knowledge and Czech legal background

Before which authority does an individual expert take the statutory oath (znalecký slib) under Section 5 of Act No. 254/2019 Sb.?

  1. Before the president of the regional court (krajský soud) in whose district the expert resides
  2. Before the President of the Supreme Court of the Czech Republic
  3. Before the head of the Judicial Academy (Justiční akademie)
  4. Into the hands of the Minister of Justice Correct answer.

Explanation

Section 5(1)(h) requires an individual applicant who has met the other entry conditions to take the oath without reservation into the hands of the Minister of Justice. Section 5(2) supplies the oath's text.

Question 5Integrated role knowledge and Czech legal background

How is the statutory entrance examination (vstupní zkouška znalce) structured under Section 10 of Act No. 254/2019 Sb.?

  1. It consists of a general part (obecná část) testing legal regulations and a special part (zvláštní část) testing field competence and report defense Correct answer.
  2. It consists solely of an oral interview before a three-judge panel of the High Court
  3. It consists of a written thesis defended before an academic faculty council without any legal test
  4. It consists of a 4-hour computer simulation of crime scene reconstruction followed by a psychometric test

Explanation

Section 10(1) of Act No. 254/2019 Sb. divides the entrance exam into two parts: the general part (obecná část), which verifies knowledge of legal regulations on expert activity and procedural law, and the special part (zvláštní část), which evaluates professional expertise and the oral defense of a sample report.

Question 6Integrated role knowledge and Czech legal background

What is the official format and passing standard for the written general part (obecná část) of the entrance examination organized by the Judicial Academy?

  1. 20 open-ended essay questions within 120 minutes, requiring an 80% mark
  2. 12 multiple-select questions in up to 50 minutes, requiring at least 9 correct answers, with up to 40 further minutes available only to a provisional failure to justify disputed answers Correct answer.
  3. 50 multiple-choice questions within 60 minutes, requiring 45 correct answers (90%)
  4. 10 practical drafting exercises within 180 minutes, scored on a pass/fail consensus by five examiners

Explanation

The current Ministry procedure uses 12 questions with one or more correct options. The initial test lasts up to 50 minutes and requires 9 correct answers. Only a provisionally unsuccessful candidate may then use up to 40 minutes to justify answers marked incorrect.

Question 7Integrated role knowledge and Czech legal background

Under Sections 10(4) and 10(5) of Act No. 254/2019 Sb., what rules govern repeat attempts after a candidate fails the entrance examination?

  1. The exam may be repeated without limit every 30 days upon payment of administrative costs
  2. The exam may be repeated twice within 3 months; failure results in a permanent lifetime disqualification
  3. The candidate may repeat the failed part once after at least 6 months; after a second failure, a 3-year waiting period applies Correct answer.
  4. The candidate must complete an additional 2-year university course before requesting an immediate retake

Explanation

The candidate must request a repeat within one month of being notified of failure. Section 10(4) permits one repeat after six months and requires the fee for the part being repeated. Under Section 10(5), a missed request deadline or failure at the repeat means a new registration application may be filed only after three years from the latest failed exam.

Question 8Integrated role knowledge and Czech legal background

Which public authority administers the Register of Experts (Seznam znalců) under Section 15 of Act No. 254/2019 Sb.?

  1. The Czech Bar Association (Česká advokátní komora)
  2. The Supreme Public Prosecutor's Office (Nejvyšší státní zastupitelství)
  3. The Judicial Academy (Justiční akademie) under delegated judicial power
  4. The Ministry of Justice of the Czech Republic (Ministerstvo spravedlnosti ČR) Correct answer.

Explanation

Section 15(1) makes the Seznam znalců a public-administration information system administered by the Ministry of Justice. Data that the Act designates public are made accessible remotely.

Question 9Integrated role knowledge and Czech legal background

Which of the following information recorded in the Register of Experts is public under Section 16(1) of Act No. 254/2019 Sb.?

  1. The expert's name, registered field and specialization, delivery address, and active registration status Correct answer.
  2. The expert's private bank account balances and annual personal income tax declarations
  3. The full text of all private contracts entered into by the expert during the preceding 5 years
  4. The health records and medical evaluation files submitted during the expert's initial application

Explanation

Section 16(1) identifies public register data including the expert's name, field and branch (and specialization if selected), registered office, data-box identifier, entry date, and suspension or termination information. Section 16(2) separately lists optional public data the expert may add.

Question 10Integrated role knowledge and Czech legal background

Who remains subject to mandatory professional liability insurance under Section 22 after the amendment effective 1 January 2026?

  1. Only experts with fewer than 20 years of experience
  2. Expert offices and expert institutes, subject to the statutory exception for a public-law entity performing activity under Section 26 Correct answer.
  3. Only experts appointed by the Constitutional Court
  4. No person or entity can be required to insure

Explanation

Section 22 now requires insurance from expert offices and expert institutes, except an institute qualifying under Section 7(2). A person appointed for a one-off expert act under Section 26 is also not required to be insured. Individual registered experts no longer have a mandatory policy but may insure voluntarily.

Question 11Integrated role knowledge and Czech legal background

What power does Section 13(3) give the Ministry when qualifying criminal proceedings are initiated against an expert?

  1. When the expert changes their permanent residential address to another district
  2. When the expert declines to accept more than two private assignments in a calendar year
  3. It may suspend authorization for prosecution connected with expert activity, or for another intentional offense threatening confidence in proper performance Correct answer.
  4. When the expert publishes an academic article criticizing an ongoing civil legislative reform

Explanation

Section 13(3)(a) gives the Ministry a discretionary power to suspend authorization in these prosecution circumstances. Section 13(1), by contrast, creates automatic suspension for events such as an enforceable remand decision or beginning imprisonment, institutional protective treatment, or preventive detention.

Question 12Integrated role knowledge and Czech legal background

Can an expert voluntarily request the Ministry of Justice to suspend their expert authorization under Section 13(2) of Act No. 254/2019 Sb.?

  1. No, expert authorization cannot be voluntarily suspended under any circumstances
  2. Yes, but only if the expert donates their working archives and seals to the National Archives
  3. Yes, but the suspension is permanent and the expert can never resume practice without re-taking all exams
  4. Yes; a written request may be made for any reason for up to three years at a time, with total voluntary suspension capped at six years Correct answer.

Explanation

An expert may request suspension in writing for any reason and must specify the period. Each requested period may last at most three years; requests may be repeated, but their combined duration may not exceed six years.

Question 13Integrated role knowledge and Czech legal background

Which event leads to the automatic termination of an expert's authorization under Section 14(4) of Act No. 254/2019 Sb.?

  1. The death or legal declaration of death of the expert Correct answer.
  2. Reaching the statutory retirement age of 65 years
  3. Failing to submit at least ten expert opinions during any two consecutive calendar years
  4. Relocating their primary professional office from Prague to another region

Explanation

Section 14(4)(a) provides that an individual's authorization ends on the expert's death. The other Section 14(4) termination events include dissolution of an office or institute, a notice ending activity, and finality of a revocation decision.

Question 14Integrated role knowledge and Czech legal background

On which ground MUST the Ministry of Justice revoke an expert's authorization (zrušení oprávnění) under Section 14(1) of Act No. 254/2019 Sb.?

  1. If the expert charges an hourly fee that exceeds the court tariff during an unregulated private arbitration
  2. If the expert ceases to meet the statutory requirement of a clean criminal record (bezúhonnost) Correct answer.
  3. If the expert fails to attend the annual voluntary meeting of the Czech Forensic Society
  4. If the expert expresses a dissenting professional opinion from that of an expert institute

Explanation

Section 14(1) requires the Ministry to revoke authorization if the expert ceases to meet the conditions for expert activity. For example, integrity is an entry condition under Section 5(1)(b), with its substantive definition in Section 9.

Question 15Integrated role knowledge and Czech legal background

What is the role of the Ministry's Advisory Boards (poradní sbory) established under Section 38 of Act No. 254/2019 Sb.?

  1. To set mandatory commercial prices for consumer goods evaluated by court appraisers
  2. To represent court experts in collective bargaining negotiations with the Ministry of Finance
  3. To serve as specialized advisory bodies to the Minister of Justice on expert branch qualifications, exams, and professional standards Correct answer.
  4. To draft binding criminal indictments against experts accused of perjury

Explanation

Section 38 authorizes the Minister of Justice to establish advisory boards for expert questions in fields and branches whose nature warrants them. They provide specialist advice; they do not exercise judicial, prosecutorial, price-setting, or collective-bargaining powers.

Question 16Integrated role knowledge and Czech legal background

Which description satisfies a central structural condition for an expert office (znalecká kancelář) under Section 6 of Act No. 254/2019 Sb.?

  1. Any private commercial company that provides translation and office printing services to courts
  2. A sole proprietorship established by a lawyer who occasionally hires technical consultants
  3. A division of the Ministry of the Interior providing ballistic testing for the National Police
  4. An institute or commercial corporation that will perform the requested scope through at least two authorized experts whose combined authorizations cover that scope Correct answer.

Explanation

Section 6(1)(a) permits an institute or commercial corporation to qualify as an expert office when it will perform the requested field, branch, and specialization through at least two authorized experts whose authorizations collectively cover the office's requested scope. The Act does not impose the claimed licensed-majority governance test.

Question 17Integrated role knowledge and Czech legal background

Under Section 7 of Act No. 254/2019 Sb., which institutions may qualify for entry as expert institutes (znalecké ústavy), subject to the other statutory conditions?

  1. Higher education institutions, public research institutions, or other state/scientific institutions specialized in scientific research Correct answer.
  2. Any commercial limited liability company with registered capital of at least CZK 100,000
  3. Non-governmental charitable organizations that advocate for consumer protection
  4. Foreign consulting firms operating under a European temporary service cross-border passport

Explanation

Section 7(1)(a) includes a higher-education institution or part of one, a public research institution, a state enterprise, a state organizational unit or its internal unit, and another public-law person. The applicant must also satisfy the provision's research, personnel, integrity, facilities, procedures, solvency, and insurance conditions as applicable.

Question 18Integrated role knowledge and Czech legal background

What supervisory powers does the Ministry of Justice possess over expert activity under Section 35 of Act No. 254/2019 Sb.?

  1. The power to alter the scientific conclusions of an expert opinion if the court disagrees with them
  2. The power to inspect expert files, verify adherence to reporting rules, and audit electronic journal compliance Correct answer.
  3. The power to order the immediate imprisonment of an expert without a court hearing
  4. The power to mandate that an expert testify only on behalf of public prosecution authorities

Explanation

Section 35 makes the Ministry the supervisory authority and lets it verify compliance with statutory duties, including through records and materials needed for supervision. It may assess whether a report is procedurally and methodologically sound, but it may not replace the expert's substantive conclusion with the Ministry's own conclusion.

Question 19Integrated role knowledge and Czech legal background

What is the maximum administrative fine under Section 39(1)(d) and (2)(c) of Act No. 254/2019 Sb. for an expert who performs expert activity while authorization is suspended?

  1. Up to CZK 50,000
  2. Up to CZK 200,000
  3. Up to CZK 500,000 Correct answer.
  4. Up to CZK 2,000,000

Explanation

Performing expert activity while authorization is suspended is an offense under Section 39(1)(d). Section 39(2)(c) places it in the bracket punishable by a fine of up to CZK 500,000.

Question 20Integrated role knowledge and Czech legal background

How are forensic specializations systematically categorized in the Central Register of Experts under Act No. 254/2019 Sb. and its implementing decrees?

  1. Solely by alphabetical listing of keywords chosen freely by the expert applicant
  2. According to European Union NACE industrial classification codes without legal distinctions
  3. Exclusively by reference to university course codes published by the Ministry of Education
  4. Into statutory fields (obory), ministerially specified branches (odvětví), and any more specific registered specialization Correct answer.

Explanation

Section 4 provides statutory fields (obory) and authorizes the Ministry to set their branches (odvětví) by decree. An expert's authorization may also include a more specific specialization. These levels define the scope in which the expert may act.

Question 21Integrated role knowledge and Czech legal background

What fundamental governance reform was introduced by Act No. 254/2019 Sb. regarding the appointment and administration of court experts compared to the superseded Act No. 36/1967 Sb.?

  1. Jurisdiction was centralized from regional court presidents directly to the Ministry of Justice, ending regional disparities Correct answer.
  2. Experts were transformed into permanent tenured state civil servants with fixed monthly salaries
  3. All expert examinations were abolished in favor of peer recommendations from bar associations
  4. Appointment was completely decentralized to municipal town halls and local mayors

Explanation

A cornerstone of the 2019 reform (effective 1 January 2021) was the centralization of expert administration, appointments, supervision, and licensing under the Ministry of Justice, replacing the fragmented system previously run by eight regional court presidents.

Question 22Integrated role knowledge and Czech legal background

What is required under Section 5(1)(c) of Act No. 254/2019 Sb. regarding an applicant's material and technical facilities and equipment (materiálně technické zázemí a přístrojové vybavení)?

  1. Ownership of an independent commercial laboratory certified by ISO 17025 in all cases
  2. The applicant must possess the material and technical facilities necessary to properly perform expert activity in the requested field Correct answer.
  3. A personal operating budget of at least CZK 500,000 deposited in an escrow account
  4. A dedicated standalone commercial office building located within 5 kilometers of a regional court

Explanation

Section 5(1)(c) requires suitable material and technical facilities and equipment that give an assurance of proper expert activity. It does not impose the same laboratory, budget, or office-building requirement across every expert field.

Question 23Integrated role knowledge and Czech legal background

How is the statutory integrity requirement (bezúhonnost) defined for experts under Section 9(1) of Act No. 254/2019 Sb.?

  1. Having never received an administrative speeding ticket during the last 10 years
  2. Having never been a respondent in a civil tort lawsuit or divorce proceeding
  3. Having not been finally convicted of an intentional criminal offense or a negligent offense committed in connection with expert activity Correct answer.
  4. Having never filed for personal debt relief under the Czech Insolvency Act

Explanation

Under Section 9(1), a person fails the integrity condition after a final conviction for an intentional criminal offense or for a negligent criminal offense connected with expert or business activity, unless the person is legally regarded as not convicted.

Question 24Integrated role knowledge and Czech legal background

By when must an expert notify the Ministry of facts that may lead to suspension or termination of authorization under Section 24 of Act No. 254/2019 Sb.?

  1. Only in the next annual return
  2. Within six months
  3. Only after the Ministry asks
  4. Without delay and no later than 15 days after the fact arose Correct answer.

Explanation

Section 24 requires notice without delay and no later than 15 days after a circumstance that may cause suspension or termination arises. Examples include qualifying prosecution, serious long-term incapacity, and loss of a condition for expert activity.

Question 25Integrated role knowledge and Czech legal background

What happens under Section 11(3) when an applicant satisfies the conditions for entry in the Register of Experts?

  1. The Ministry enters the applicant within 15 days; the entry decision is not produced in writing and becomes final through the entry itself Correct answer.
  2. It is an unreviewable discretionary political appointment made at the sole pleasure of the Minister
  3. It is a private bilateral employment agreement between the applicant and the Supreme Court
  4. It is an honorary academic title conferred under the Higher Education Act

Explanation

Section 11(3) directs the Ministry to enter an applicant who satisfies the conditions, within 15 days after fulfillment of the conditions or the oath for an individual. The entry decision is not produced in writing and becomes final when the applicant is entered.

Question 26Integrated role knowledge and Czech legal background

What core principle governs the professional conduct of a forensic expert under Section 1(3) and (4) of Act No. 254/2019 Sb.?

  1. The expert must act as a vigorous advocate for the party that paid their initial retainer
  2. The expert must perform expert activity independently, impartially, and with professional care (odborná péče) Correct answer.
  3. The expert must align their conclusions with the preliminary guidance of the public prosecutor
  4. The expert is bound to follow the interpretation of facts agreed upon by the disputing parties

Explanation

The Act's core duties require work within the registered field, branch, and specialization; professional care; personal performance; independence and impartiality; and performance within the agreed or prescribed time. The paying or appointing party does not control the conclusion.

Question 27Integrated role knowledge and Czech legal background

Under Section 18(1) of Act No. 254/2019 Sb., when is an expert disqualified from preparing an expert opinion due to bias (vyloučení pro podjatost)?

  1. Whenever the expert resides in the same municipality where the court is located
  2. Whenever the expert has previously testified in a different case involving similar legal provisions
  3. Whenever there are justified doubts regarding the expert's impartiality given their relationship to the matter, the authorities, the parties, or their representatives Correct answer.
  4. Whenever the expert's hourly tariff is higher than the average statutory rate

Explanation

Section 18(1) of Act No. 254/2019 Sb. provides that an expert is excluded if, in view of their relationship to the case, to public authorities, to the parties to proceedings, or to their legal representatives, there are reasonable grounds to doubt their impartiality.

Question 28Integrated role knowledge and Czech legal background

What must an expert do upon learning of a circumstance that creates reasonable doubt about impartiality under Section 18(2) of Act No. 254/2019 Sb.?

  1. Quietly complete the opinion and let the court discover any bias during cross-examination
  2. Discuss the matter privately with the appointing judge over an informal phone call
  3. Request a financial bonus to compensate for the ethical discomfort
  4. Notify the ordering party without delay; if a public authority appointed the expert, that authority decides whether the expert is excluded Correct answer.

Explanation

Section 18(2) requires immediate notice to the ordering party. Where a public authority appointed the expert, that authority decides whether the expert is excluded from giving the report in the matter. The Act does not support silently completing the work or curing bias through extra compensation.

Question 29Integrated role knowledge and Czech legal background

Which of the following is a mandatory ground for refusing an expert act under Section 19(1) of Act No. 254/2019 Sb.?

  1. The expert's authorization to perform expert activity is suspended Correct answer.
  2. The expert considers the subject matter scientifically uninteresting
  3. The expert has already submitted one report in that calendar week
  4. The court refuses to provide free transportation in a judicial limousine

Explanation

Section 19(1)(a) requires refusal when authorization is suspended. Section 18 separately prohibits the expert from performing an act where a relationship to the matter or relevant people creates reasonable doubt about impartiality.

Question 30Integrated role knowledge and Czech legal background

When does workload require an expert to refuse an expert act under Section 19(1)(c) of Act No. 254/2019 Sb.?

  1. Only if the expert has obtained prior written authorization from the Czech Bar Association
  2. If other expert duties or serious work overload would prevent the expert from preparing the opinion within the required deadline without endangering other duties Correct answer.
  3. Only during the months of July and August during judicial recess
  4. Whenever the expert decides they prefer to take an extended holiday

Explanation

Section 19(1)(c) requires refusal when the number or nature of already assigned, unfinished reports prevents another expert act from being performed with professional care and on time. The ground depends on the actual workload and its effect on compliant performance.

Question 31Integrated role knowledge and Czech legal background

Which scope-based circumstance requires refusal under Section 19(1)(b) of Act No. 254/2019 Sb.?

  1. The file contains more than 100 pages
  2. The appointing authority is located outside the expert's home municipality
  3. The required act falls outside the field, branch, or specialization covered by the expert's authorization Correct answer.
  4. The case has already been reported by the news media

Explanation

Section 19(1)(b) requires refusal when the expert lacks authorization in the field, branch, or specialization needed for the act. The current provision does not contain the invented unpaid-advance ground that this item previously asserted.

Question 32Integrated role knowledge and Czech legal background

What does the statutory principle of personal performance (osobní výkon znalecké činnosti) strictly prohibit?

  1. Using standard laboratory testing equipment owned by an accredited university
  2. Relying on peer-reviewed academic literature published by foreign authors
  3. Asking administrative staff to print, bind, and mail the completed paper report
  4. Subcontracting or delegating the core scientific analysis and formulation of conclusions to an unauthorized third party Correct answer.

Explanation

Personal performance means the registered expert cannot outsource the expert act to an employee, subcontractor, or other person and then merely review or certify it. Ordinary administrative support does not transfer the expert analysis or conclusions.

Question 33Integrated role knowledge and Czech legal background

Under what statutory conditions may an appointed expert engage a consultant (konzultant) under Section 23 of Act No. 254/2019 Sb.?

  1. With the ordering party's consent, to consider a special subsidiary question required by the nature of the matter, while the expert remains responsible and performs the act personally Correct answer.
  2. Whenever the expert prefers not to attend oral court hearings in person
  3. To completely draft the findings and conclusions while the expert merely signs and stamps the cover page
  4. Consultants may only be engaged if they are family members of the expert

Explanation

Section 23 allows a consultant only when the nature of the matter requires consideration of a special subsidiary question and the ordering party consents. The consultant provides advice and may not independently perform a part of the expert act; the expert remains responsible.

Question 34Integrated role knowledge and Czech legal background

What must an expert report disclose when a consultant was engaged under Section 23 of Act No. 254/2019 Sb.?

  1. Nothing, because consultant collaboration is protected by commercial secret privileges
  2. The identity of the consultant, the reasons why they were engaged, and the exact scope of their contribution Correct answer.
  3. Only the consultant's tax identification number on a separate sealed envelope
  4. A statement that the consultant has agreed to assume all legal liability for the court case

Explanation

The report identifies the consultant, explains the reason for engaging that person, and identifies the special subsidiary question considered. Decree No. 503/2020 Sb. places consultant information on the final page and requires attribution of the relevant part; it is separate from the three statutory contents of the expert clause itself.

Question 35Integrated role knowledge and Czech legal background

What is the statutory scope and temporal duration of an expert's duty of confidentiality (povinnost mlčenlivosti) under Section 20(1) of Act No. 254/2019 Sb.?

  1. It applies only during active court sessions and expires as soon as the judge enters the verdict room
  2. It lasts for exactly 3 years from the date the expert report is submitted to the electronic journal
  3. It covers all facts learned in connection with expert activity and continues indefinitely even after the cessation of expert authorization Correct answer.
  4. It applies only to trade secrets explicitly marked as confidential in red ink by the parties

Explanation

Section 20(1) of Act No. 254/2019 Sb. mandates that the expert must maintain confidentiality regarding all facts learned in connection with their expert activity. This duty persists indefinitely, even after the termination or revocation of their authorization.

Question 36Integrated role knowledge and Czech legal background

Under Section 20(1) and (2) of Act No. 254/2019 Sb., who may release an expert or a participating person from the statutory duty of confidentiality (zproštění mlčenlivosti)?

  1. The Czech Bar Association upon request of an advocate
  2. The National Security Authority (NBÚ) in all civil and commercial disputes
  3. Any registered journalist reporting on public interest litigation
  4. The ordering party (zadavatel) for the expert act Correct answer.

Explanation

Section 20(1) states that only the ordering party may release the expert. Section 20(2) applies the duty to consultants and other participants and likewise reserves release to the ordering party. Separate statutory exceptions in Sections 20(3) and (4) do not give journalists or professional bodies a general waiver power.

Question 37Integrated role knowledge and Czech legal background

Which use of information is expressly outside the confidentiality prohibition under Section 20(3) of Act No. 254/2019 Sb.?

  1. Using information in a proportionate and anonymized way for scientific or educational purposes Correct answer.
  2. Publishing interesting case findings on social media with party names replaced by pseudonyms
  3. Disclosing client confidential financial records to commercial marketing agencies for academic research
  4. Sharing draft findings with personal friends during private social gatherings

Explanation

Section 20 permits proportionate, anonymized use for scientific or educational purposes. It also prevents confidentiality from blocking specified use before the public authority in whose proceeding the act is used or specified Ministry supervision and administrative proceedings.

Question 38Integrated role knowledge and Czech legal background

What procedural right does an appointed forensic expert have regarding the case file and factual evidence under Section 127 of the Code of Civil Procedure (OSŘ) and Section 107 of the Criminal Procedure Code (TŘ)?

  1. The right to confiscate original police evidence permanently for the expert's private collection
  2. The right to inspect the court or investigative file and request that the authority clarify or supplement necessary materials Correct answer.
  3. The right to secretly search the private residence of the defendant without a judicial warrant
  4. The right to issue final default judgments if the parties do not respond to expert questionnaires

Explanation

Procedural codes (Section 127 OSŘ, Section 107 TŘ) confer upon the appointed expert the procedural right to study the relevant file materials and request the court or investigating body to provide missing documents, clarify ambiguous questions, or inspect objects of examination.

Question 39Integrated role knowledge and Czech legal background

Under procedural law (Section 127 of the Civil Procedure Code and Section 108 of the Criminal Procedure Code), may an appointed expert attend oral hearings and put questions to witnesses or parties?

  1. No, an expert is strictly confined to writing and may never enter a courtroom during evidentiary proceedings
  2. Yes, but only if the expert pays an attendance fee to the court clerk
  3. Yes, the expert may attend procedural hearings, inspect evidence during trial, and put questions to parties and witnesses with the presiding judge's permission Correct answer.
  4. Yes, and the expert has the statutory right to cross-examine attorneys and overrule judicial objections

Explanation

In civil (Section 127(1) OSŘ) and criminal (Section 108 TŘ) proceedings, the expert may be present at the hearing, observe other evidence, and, with the presiding judge's permission, put clarifying questions to the parties, witnesses, or other experts.

Question 40Integrated role knowledge and Czech legal background

What is the established procedural limit known as the prohibition of legal assessment (zákaz právního hodnocení) by forensic experts in Czech jurisprudence?

  1. Experts are prohibited from reading the text of any statute or ministry decree
  2. Experts must not disclose their hourly rates because fees are governed by law
  3. Experts cannot evaluate whether a witness spoke under emotional distress
  4. Experts are summoned solely to resolve technical or factual questions requiring specialized knowledge, and must never resolve questions of law or determine legal guilt or liability Correct answer.

Explanation

Under established Czech jurisprudence and Section 1 of Act No. 254/2019 Sb., forensic experts are tasked strictly with elucidating facts requiring specialized expertise (odborné znalosti). The application of law, legal assessment (právní hodnocení), and determinations of legal guilt or civil liability belong exclusively to the court.

Question 41Integrated role knowledge and Czech legal background

Which approach complies with the generally recognized procedure and standards rule in Section 28(5) of Act No. 254/2019 Sb.?

  1. Use generally recognized procedures and standards in the relevant field and branch, or clearly justify a warranted departure Correct answer.
  2. Whatever historical method was in use at the time the expert graduated from secondary school
  3. Only methods that have been approved by a unanimous vote of the Czech Parliament
  4. Any speculative theory as long as it has been published on an unmoderated internet blog

Explanation

Section 28(5) requires a report, except in justified cases, to follow generally recognized procedures and standards of the field and branch. A justified departure must be explained so the method and its effect on the conclusion remain reviewable.

Question 42Integrated role knowledge and Czech legal background

What is the statutory deadline under Section 16(5) of Act No. 254/2019 Sb. for an expert to notify or enter a change in specified register data?

  1. Within 24 hours via telephone to the Minister's secretariat
  2. Without delay and no later than 15 days after the change Correct answer.
  3. Within 6 months during the annual tax reconciliation period
  4. No notification is required until the expert applies for re-examination after 5 years

Explanation

Specified register changes must be handled without delay and no later than 15 days after the change. The Ministry enters core official data after notification; from 2026 the expert personally updates certain optional fields, including email, optional contact address, website, and voluntary individual-insurance data.

Question 43Integrated role knowledge and Czech legal background

What does Section 13(5) require after an expert's authorization is suspended?

  1. The expert may accept unlimited new assignments until the Ministry updates its website
  2. Every completed report automatically becomes invalid and must be destroyed
  3. The expert must not begin unstarted reports, must inform their ordering parties, and ordinarily completes work already in progress unless that conflicts with the reason for suspension Correct answer.
  4. The suspension automatically transfers every assignment to a family member

Explanation

Section 13(5) bars new expert activity and requires prompt notice to the ordering parties for reports not yet begun. Reports already in progress, and supplements or explanations of submitted reports, are ordinarily completed unless doing so conflicts with the suspension reason. In that conflict, the decision records it, the ordering parties are informed, and supplied materials are returned without delay.

Question 44Integrated role knowledge and Czech legal background

What must an expert-institute report include under Section 28(4) of Act No. 254/2019 Sb.?

  1. Only the institute's logo; identifying contributors is prohibited
  2. A vote by all judges of the court that ordered the report
  3. A commercial advertising page for the institute's unrelated services
  4. The required signature, identification of contributors and the person responsible for confirming or explaining it, plus the institute's recorded acknowledgement with date and responsible signature Correct answer.

Explanation

Section 28(4) requires an expert-institute report to be signed by the qualifying person, identify who participated and who must personally confirm, supplement, or explain it when requested by the relevant public authority, and record the institute's internal acknowledgement with its date and the responsible person's signature.

Question 45Integrated role knowledge and Czech legal background

What measure does Section 37 of Act No. 254/2019 Sb. prescribe for minor shortcomings in expert activity?

  1. A written admonition (písemná výtka), recorded as non-public register data for three years Correct answer.
  2. A public pillory notice published on municipal billboards for 30 days
  3. Confiscation of the expert's private automobile and residential property
  4. A mandatory 500 hours of community service sweeping regional court corridors

Explanation

Under Section 37, the Ministry addresses minor shortcomings in expert activity with a written admonition (písemná výtka). The admonition is entered as non-public register data and remains recorded for three years.

Question 46Integrated role knowledge and Czech legal background

Which sequence lists the principal mandatory components of a paper expert report under the current framework?

  1. Foreword (předmluva), Hypotheses (hypotézy), and Addendum (dovětek)
  2. Title page; assignment; list of sources; findings; assessment; reasoning; conclusion; necessary annexes where possible; expert clause; and seal impression Correct answer.
  3. Complaint (žaloba), Replication (replika), and Judgment (rozsudek)
  4. Billing (vyúčtování), Affidavit (čestné prohlášení), and Seal imprint (otisk pečetidla)

Explanation

Section 28(2) of Act No. 254/2019 Sb., detailed by Decree No. 503/2020 Sb., requires more than a three-part outline. The report includes a title page, assignment, source list, findings, assessment, reasoning, conclusion, necessary reviewability annexes where possible, expert clause, and seal impression.

Question 47Integrated role knowledge and Czech legal background

What belongs in the 'Nález' (findings/data part) under Section 41(2) of Decree No. 503/2020 Sb.?

  1. A complete autobiography of the expert and a list of all personal scientific publications
  2. The financial credit rating of both litigating parties obtained from commercial credit bureaus
  3. A description of how data were collected or created, how those data were processed, and a list of the data Correct answer.
  4. The presiding judge's personal salary grade and courtroom seating chart

Explanation

The findings section describes the collection or creation of data, the processing of those data, and the data themselves. The expert question and intended use belong in the separate assignment section; selection and description of sources belong in the separate source list.

Question 48Integrated role knowledge and Czech legal background

What must the 'Posudek' (assessment/analysis part) contain under Section 41(3) of Decree No. 503/2020 Sb.?

  1. A binding legal verdict deciding which party wins the litigation
  2. A subjective poem reflecting on the nature of justice and human fallibility
  3. A copy of the local municipal zoning ordinance with unrelated building permits
  4. A description of the data-analysis procedure and the results of that analysis Correct answer.

Explanation

Section 41(3) requires the assessment part to describe the procedure used to analyze the data and to state the analysis results. Interpretation of those results and the expert's check of the process appear in the separate reasoning section to make the report reviewable.

Question 49Integrated role knowledge and Czech legal background

What is required of the 'Závěr' (conclusion) under Section 41(5) and Section 58 of Decree No. 503/2020 Sb.?

  1. It must provide clear, concise, and unambiguous answers to each of the questions formulated in the assignment Correct answer.
  2. It must provide multiple ambiguous philosophical hypotheses to allow the judge total artistic freedom
  3. It must instruct the public prosecutor on the appropriate criminal sentence to be imposed in months of incarceration
  4. It must be drafted in Latin and sealed in a wax capsule accessible only by court order

Explanation

The conclusion repeats each assigned expert question and answers it. If the materials or method do not support an unqualified answer, the expert gives the most precise answer possible and states validity conditions or other accuracy limits; if no answer is possible, that itself is the answer.

Question 50Integrated role knowledge and Czech legal background

What does the requirement of reviewability (přezkoumatelnost) under Section 28(1) of Act No. 254/2019 Sb. mean for an expert report?

  1. The report must be written in an obscure technical code that can only be deciphered by the original author
  2. The report must describe the facts, methods, and reasoning so clearly that another qualified expert in the field can verify and reproduce the conclusions Correct answer.
  3. The report must be approved in advance by the Minister of Justice prior to delivery to court
  4. The report must be published in a peer-reviewed international scientific journal before it can be submitted in court

Explanation

Section 28(1) requires a submitted report to be complete, truthful, and reviewable. The report must disclose its sources, data handling, methods, analysis, reasoning, and limits clearly enough for the procedure and resulting conclusion to be checked.