DABCC study materials
DABCC study resources

DABCC: Data Quality Management

DABCC · Work through your exam, one topic at a time.

All guide sections

Data Quality Management

What this domain tests

Can you define, measure and remediate quality with business owners rather than run a one-off cleanse? Expect questions on dimensions, thresholds, root cause and issue management.

Core rules

  • Quality is fitness for purpose, defined against a use. The same field can be fit for marketing and unfit for billing.
  • Dimensions: completeness (populated), validity (conforms to domain or format), accuracy (matches reality), consistency (agrees across systems), uniqueness (no duplicates), timeliness (available when needed), conformity (standard formats).
  • Lifecycle: profile → define rules with thresholds → measure and score → root-cause → remediate at source where possible → monitor continuously.
  • Validity is not accuracy: a syntactically valid email can still be wrong. Only reference data or confirmation proves accuracy.
  • Each rule needs an owner, a threshold, a frequency and an action, for example email completeness of at least 98% measured weekly, with a steward-opened issue below threshold.
  • Prefer source correction over downstream cleansing; cleansing hides the defect and it recurs on the next load. Preserve the raw value for audit.
  • Issue management: log, classify severity, root-cause (process, entry, integration, definition), fix, verify, close.

Worked example

A CRM email field is 82% complete; the campaign team needs 95%. Reasoning: (1) Define completeness precisely - non-null, valid format, not a role address - because counting non-null alone inflates the score. (2) Measure by segment; if B2B accounts drive the gap, target intake. (3) Root cause: email is optional at point of sale and unvalidated. (4) Fix at source: require it for B2B, add format validation, backfill through a consent-compliant campaign. (5) Set a weekly scorecard threshold and re-measure. Note the trade-off: forcing completeness can produce fake entries unless paired with validation.

Traps that cost marks

  • Reporting a single data quality score with no dimension or denominator.
  • Measuring only in the warehouse, after the defect has propagated.
  • Confusing accuracy with validity or completeness.
  • Cleansing without root cause, so the defect returns next cycle.
  • Thresholds with no owner or action; a red dashboard nobody acts on.