The Pipe That Does Not Match the Deed
A 42.6-acre parcel in Sussex County is being retraced for a two-lot subdivision. The 1998 deed runs N 12°45' E 1,286.42 ft to a set iron pipe. Your field search finds a 30-inch iron pipe with a cap stamped with the original surveyor's license number 0.42 ft southeast of the calculated position. A second, unpainted pipe sits 1,286.9 ft from the southwest corner on a line that matches an old fence and the adjoiner's deed. The adjoiner's 2004 survey calls for the capped pipe, and the fence has been in place since at least 1972. The client wants the boundary held to the deed bearing and distance because 'the math is the math,' and the lender wants a certified area within 0.1 acre. A junior technician proposes setting a new corner at the record position and noting the capped pipe as 'found, not accepted.'
1. Which evidence controls the corner location, and what should you do with the two pipes?
Read the worked answer
Start with the hierarchy of boundary evidence, but do not apply it mechanically. A duly placed original monument generally controls over courses and distances, so the capped pipe is strong evidence if you can establish that it is the original corner called for in the 1998 deed. Test its provenance: the cap, the license number, its relationship to the old fence, the adjoiner's recognition of it, and whether it is undisturbed. The 0.42-ft offset may reflect a record error, a later replacement, or a different corner. The unpainted pipe is not automatically better because it fits the bearing and distance; it may be a later set point. If the capped pipe is original, hold it and explain the difference from the deed. If it is a replacement, use the best available evidence and state your reasoning. Do not set a new corner at the record position while dismissing the capped pipe; that creates a false corner and ignores evidence.
2. How should you respond to the client's demand for record bearing and the lender's 0.1-acre tolerance?
Read the worked answer
Explain that a boundary survey locates the boundary, not the acreage the parties wish to see. Area is computed from the located boundary and is a result, not a guarantee. If holding the record line changes the area by more than the lender's 0.1-acre tolerance, report the computed area and the basis for it, and let the lender decide whether to accept a qualified survey. Do not distort the boundary, widen a deed line, or adjust a monument to hit an area tolerance. In your client communication, show the comparison between record and located area, identify the source of the difference, and state that the certified area is subject to the boundary resolution. If the lender requires a specific certification, read the exact language before signing; a statement that the area is 'within 0.1 acre' may be impossible to make truthfully.
3. What belongs in the survey record and client communication?
Read the worked answer
The record should include field notes describing both pipes, their positions, condition, and cap markings; photographs; the deed and adjoiner references; the fence evidence; the calculation showing the 0.42-ft offset; and a clear statement of which evidence you accepted and why. The plat should show found monuments, any monument you set, and the relationship between the record line and the located line. Do not label the record position as the corner if you did not accept it. In the client letter, separate facts from conclusions: what you found, how you weighed it, what you located, and what remains unresolved. If the adjoiner disagrees, say so and recommend legal review rather than promising a boundary that only a court can settle. Retain the file, because the reasoning is as important as the final map.