Naming Devices Is Not Analysis: The Nordic Youth Assembly Speech
A Year 13 class analyses a fictional speech delivered at the Nordic Youth Assembly by a 17-year-old delegate. The opening reads: 'We are not waiting. We are not asking. We are not begging. We are building.' Later: 'You have the maps. We have the shovels. And the ground is already moving.' Student Lennart writes: 'The speaker uses anaphora (We are not...) and a metaphor (the ground is already moving) to make her speech more interesting and to persuade the audience. The repetition emphasises her point.' The task asks how the speaker constructs her relationship with the adult audience, and the mark scheme requires device, function, and intended effect on that audience. Lennart receives three of nine points. His teacher notes that he identifies devices correctly but never states what the devices do to the audience's position, and that he calls the maps and shovels lines a metaphor without explaining vehicle and tenor.
1. Using Lennart's two quoted examples, show how each can be developed from device-spotting into a full device–function–effect chain for the adult audience.
Read the worked answer
Anaphora ('We are not waiting. We are not asking. We are not begging.'): naming it is only the start. The repeated negation builds a ladder of refused roles - waiting, asking, begging - each more supplicant than the last. The function is to reject the position of petitioner and to expose the adult audience as the body that expected petitions. The effect on that audience is accusatory: they are positioned as the ones who made youth wait. The fourth sentence, 'We are building', breaks the pattern, converting repetition into a claim of agency. That deviation is the rhetorical payoff, and Lennart's 'emphasises her point' misses it.
'You have the maps. We have the shovels. And the ground is already moving.': this is not best described as metaphor. Maps and shovels are concrete objects standing for institutional knowledge and practical labour - a metonymic antithesis. The function is to redistribute competence: adults have navigation, youth have action. 'The ground is already moving' can be read literally as climate change and figuratively as the political terrain, which is why it unsettles the audience rather than merely decorating the speech. Effect: the adults are warned that youth will act with or without their maps.
2. Lennart asks why 'metaphor' was the wrong label. Explain the distinction and give a corrected label with justification.
Read the worked answer
A metaphor asserts a resemblance: A is B, as in 'the classroom was a zoo'. Here the speaker does not say the maps are knowledge; she juxtaposes two possession sentences and lets the reader infer the roles. That is closer to metonymy or symbol, where an object stands for a domain by association: maps evoke planning, authority and navigation; shovels evoke labour and commitment. 'The ground is already moving' is a better candidate for metaphor, but even there the literal climate meaning remains active, so the label needs justification rather than being dropped in. The exam does not reward terminology for its own sake: the mark scheme rewards explaining what the image does to the audience's position. Lennart should either justify 'metaphor' by naming vehicle and tenor or switch to 'metonymic antithesis' and explain the association.