A convenience acknowledged and then qualified

An original Japanese argument reads: 「確かに、インターネットで多くの情報を集めることができる。しかし、情報が多いからといって、その内容を正しく理解しているとは限らない。出典を確かめる力も必要だ」。 One learner summarizes it as a demand to stop using the internet. Another reports only that information can be gathered and ignores the qualification. A third identifies a benefit together with a distinction between access and understanding. The task asks for the writer’s position and a concise Japanese summary. No actual study, school rule or measured population is cited. This is newly composed language practice, not a quotation attributed to a journalist or researcher. The response should preserve the concession and the limitation rather than replace them with a personal opinion about technology.