A volume incentive hides additional rework
A fictional team receives rewards based only on the number of cases closed each day. The supplied records show rising closure counts but more reopened cases, customer complaints and repeated corrections by the next shift. A colleague proposes declaring the supervisor effective because the rewarded number improved. Another compares the full intended service outcome, quality and employee incentives. This written exercise awards no pay and changes no performance rating. It asks the learner to distinguish local measured activity from useful completed work and explain how a balanced review can investigate the system without making a clinical judgment or assuming every employee deliberately acted dishonestly.
1. What does the closure count fail to show?
Read the worked answer
It does not establish correct lasting resolution or customer value; the reopened cases and downstream rework undermine that broader success claim.
2. What should a justified supervisory response examine?
Read the worked answer
Review actual quality, reopened-work definitions, incentive effects, capacity and handovers. Use fair evidence, clarify expectations and monitor an appropriate balanced outcome.