A request without an invented agreement
A newly composed Hungarian email contains “Szeretném kérni, hogy erősítsék meg az új időpontot.” The writer needs confirmation of a proposed change. A summary instead says that everyone already accepted the new arrangement and promises reimbursement for any inconvenience. Neither acceptance nor a reimbursement rule is supplied in the source. The learner must revise the summary and decide what a response should request. This exercise does not establish a contractual remedy, a universal legal deadline or a particular official examination word count. The context is simply an instructional communication task. A suitable response preserves the writer’s request, explains which information remains unresolved and uses a coherent register. It can be clear and firm without fabricating authority. Full productive practice would require composing and reviewing an entire Hungarian message, beyond selecting a recognition answer.
1. What must the summary preserve?
Read the worked answer
The writer asks for confirmation of the new time. The source does not show agreement from everyone or a reimbursement promise.
2. What should a follow-up seek?
Read the worked answer
It should seek confirmation of the proposed time and any relevant arrangements. It should not announce invented acceptance or a legal entitlement.