EIKEN Grade 1 study materials
EIKEN Grade 1 study resources

Reading: The Open-Plan Office and the Ironic Triumph

EIKEN Grade 1 · Put your knowledge to work in context.

All case studies

Reading: The Open-Plan Office and the Ironic Triumph

Passage: 'The new open-plan office was a triumph of collaboration. By removing walls, the company removed the last barriers to communication: the marketing team could now hear the finance team's printer jam, and the engineers could enjoy the sales team's motivational playlist at 8:30 a.m. Productivity, the facilities manager explained, would rise because employees would no longer waste time walking to each other's desks. On the first Monday, a senior analyst arrived with noise-cancelling headphones; by Friday, three more had done the same. The company's quarterly report praised the vibrant acoustic environment.' A question asks: 'The author mentions the headphones primarily to...' The options are: (A) show that employees preferred music; (B) illustrate a practical response that undercuts the manager's claim; (C) prove that open-plan offices are unhealthy; (D) suggest that the analyst was antisocial. You must choose one and justify it in two sentences.

1. What is the narrator's attitude, and how do you know?

Read the worked answer

Attitude: ironic and critical. The narrator calls the office 'a triumph of collaboration,' then lists noises that obstruct concentration: a printer jam and a motivational playlist at 8:30 a.m. The phrase 'could enjoy' is sarcastic, and the headphones are a quiet protest. The final line, 'vibrant acoustic environment,' is management euphemism for noise. The narrator never says directly that the office is bad, so the tone must be inferred from the gap between the lofty claim and the petty, concrete consequences.

2. What is the effect of the phrase 'triumph of collaboration'?

Read the worked answer

The phrase sets up a deflation. 'Triumph of collaboration' promises a success story; the colon then delivers examples of irritation rather than collaboration. The effect is irony: the reader recognizes that the manager's vocabulary is doing the opposite of describing reality. If the question asks about tone, the phrase is evidence for satire, not praise. If it asks about function, the phrase creates expectations that the rest of the paragraph undercuts.

3. Which option, A-D, is best for the headphones question, and why?

Read the worked answer

B is the best answer. The headphones show employees adapting individually to a problem the manager denies, which undercuts the claim that productivity will rise through spontaneous communication. They are not evidence that employees 'preferred music' (A); they are worn to block sound. They do not prove open-plan offices are unhealthy (C), only that concentration is difficult. And they do not show the analyst is antisocial (D); they show a practical response. The key is that the detail is used as evidence against the manager's prediction, not as a personal attack.