EIKEN Grade 1 study materials
EIKEN Grade 1 study resources

EIKEN Grade 1: Reading: vocabulary precision and long-passage logic

EIKEN Grade 1 · Work through your exam, one topic at a time.

All guide sections

Reading: vocabulary precision and long-passage logic

The Grade 1 Reading section shares a 100-minute paper with the writing task and assumes you can already read English comfortably. What it measures is a receptive vocabulary of roughly 10,000–15,000 words, control of formal collocation and idiom, and the stamina to follow dense expository prose on economics, science, law and social policy.

Part 1 - vocabulary and idiom items

Each item is a single sentence with one blank, and the four options are usually near-synonyms that differ in transitivity, register or collocation. Work in three passes: what the slot needs grammatically (a transitive verb? an uncountable noun? an adjective before a noun?), then the meaning field, then collocation with the words touching the blank. Curb, restrain and restrict all mean limit, but only one fits "___ inflation" in formal economic prose.

Part 2 - cohesive gap-fill

Here the blank tests cohesion rather than word meaning: logical connectives (conversely, albeit, whereas), pronoun and determiner reference, and topic continuity. Read the whole paragraph before choosing; the decisive clue often sits in the sentence after the gap, not before it.

Part 3 - long passages

Two or three long passages carry most of the marks. Items ask for the main idea, a paraphrase of a specific claim, an inference from stated evidence, the author's attitude, or a phrase's meaning in context. Map before reading closely: paragraph one plus the first sentence of every later paragraph. Grade 1 passages typically run claim → evidence → counterargument → qualified conclusion, so knowing where the concession begins stops you choosing an option that states only half the argument.

Worked example

Passage: "The researchers concede that their sample came from a single industry, though they argue the mechanism is general." Question: Which best reflects the researchers' position? A. They doubt their findings apply outside one industry. B. They acknowledge a limitation while defending the broader claim. ✓ C. They argue the sample should have been larger. D. They claim the mechanism holds only in that industry. Reasoning: concede marks an admitted weakness, and though reverses direction; argue the mechanism is general is the claim being defended. A and D keep only the concession - the classic half-answer. C imports a criticism the text never makes.

Traps that cost marks

  • Options that reuse the passage's vocabulary but flip the logical connector.
  • Words that are grammatical but collocationally wrong.
  • Answers drawn from background knowledge rather than the printed text.
  • Absolute quantifiers - always, never, proves - where the passage hedges with tends to or suggests.
  • Spending twelve minutes on vocabulary items, which should take about ten.