I85PREP
⌘ K
EPSO Translator study materials
EPSO Translator study resources

EPSO Translator practice questions

One question at a time. Build your EPSO Translator understanding.

First 50 of 200 questions. Each one lists the choices, the correct answer, and an explanation. The checker at the top of this page saves progress in this browser when it is available.

Continue in the practice tool above to load more questions, 50 at a time.

Question 1Linguistic ability (target language translation)

In an EU institutional text, a translator must decide whether to render the French «la Commission» as 'the Commission' or 'the Commission of the European Union'. Which principle of institutional terminology governs this choice?

  1. Short forms are acceptable when the referent is unambiguous from context, following the institution's terminology conventions. Correct answer.
  2. Each occurrence must mirror the source text's own choice between long and short form.
  3. Institutional names must be translated literally from the source language to preserve fidelity.
  4. The full official designation must always be spelled out at first mention and thereafter abbreviated.

Explanation

Institutional terminology practice allows the established short form when the referent is clear, provided it matches the official designation recorded in the terminology database. Literal mirroring of the source's stylistic variation is not a translation rule, and spelling out the full name every time would be stylistically wrong in running EU text.

Question 2Linguistic ability (target language translation)

A source sentence reads: 'The Agency shall, where appropriate, consult the stakeholders concerned.' Which target rendering best preserves the modal and conditional structure for an EU regulatory text?

  1. The Agency shall consult the stakeholders concerned where appropriate. Correct answer.
  2. The Agency is to consult stakeholders, as the case may be, appropriately.
  3. The Agency consults the relevant stakeholders when needed.
  4. The Agency might consult interested stakeholders if it seems suitable.

Explanation

'Shall' in EU legal drafting expresses a binding obligation and is conventionally rendered by the corresponding mandatory form in the target language, while 'where appropriate' is a conditional qualifier retained as such. The other renderings weaken the obligation, alter the register, or produce awkward syntax.

Question 3Linguistic ability (target language translation)

When translating an EU press release, the translator encounters 'the College of Commissioners'. What is the standard approach in the target language?

  1. Leave it in the source language with a bracketed gloss.
  2. Use the official established term for the body as recorded in the terminology database. Correct answer.
  3. Replace it with 'the Commissioners' to simplify for general readers.
  4. Translate word for word to preserve the metaphor of a college.

Explanation

Names of EU bodies have fixed official equivalents in each language, and translators must use the established term rather than inventing a rendering. Word-for-word translation of 'College' would be misleading, and simplification or leaving it untranslated breaches terminology consistency.

Question 4Linguistic ability (target language translation)

A source text uses 'Member State' repeatedly. Which translation issue is most relevant for a translator working into a language where the compound is normally written as two words?

  1. Whether the target language's compounding and capitalisation conventions override the source's capitalisation. Correct answer.
  2. Whether to translate it as 'country' to avoid repetition.
  3. Whether to capitalise both elements to mark it as a defined term.
  4. Whether to insert a hyphen to reflect the source's spacing.

Explanation

Capitalisation and compounding follow the target language's own orthographic and institutional conventions, not the source's formatting. Defined-term capitalisation in the source does not automatically transfer, and substituting 'country' would lose the legal specificity of the term.

Question 5Linguistic ability (target language translation)

Which sentence best illustrates a 'false friend' trap for a translator working from French into English?

  1. Rendering 'actuellement' as 'actually' when the meaning is 'currently'. Correct answer.
  2. Rendering 'la directive' as 'directive'.
  3. Rendering 'le Conseil' as 'Council'.
  4. Rendering 'le Parlement' as 'Parliament'.

Explanation

A false friend is a source-language word that resembles a target-language word but carries a different meaning; French 'actuellement' means 'currently', not 'actually'. The other pairs are genuine cognates whose meanings coincide, so they pose no such trap.

Question 6Linguistic ability (target language translation)

A source passage contains 'the Commission adopted the proposal by written procedure'. Which translation decision best reflects EU procedural terminology?

  1. Translate literally as 'by a procedure that was written'.
  2. Paraphrase as 'the Commission approved the proposal in writing'.
  3. Render 'written procedure' with the established procedural term for that adoption method. Correct answer.
  4. Omit the procedural detail as it is not essential to the reader.

Explanation

'Written procedure' is a defined procedural mechanism in EU decision-making with a fixed equivalent in each language. Paraphrasing or omitting it loses the specific procedural meaning, and a literal but unidiomatic rendering misrepresents the term.

Question 7Linguistic ability (target language translation)

In translating an EU legislative text, which element most requires terminological consistency across the whole document?

  1. Defined terms and recurring institutional names Correct answer.
  2. Transitional adverbs between paragraphs
  3. Adjectives used for emphasis
  4. Stylistic variation in sentence openings

Explanation

Defined terms and official names carry legal weight and must be rendered identically throughout to avoid ambiguity. Emphasis adjectives, transitional adverbs, and stylistic variation are matters of style where variation is acceptable or even desirable.

Question 8Linguistic ability (target language translation)

A translator must render the English 'The report shall be submitted to the Committee within two months of its adoption.' Which feature is most critical to preserve?

  1. The passive voice construction
  2. The exact word order of the source sentence
  3. The use of 'its' as a possessive pronoun
  4. The obligation, the addressee, and the time limit Correct answer.

Explanation

In legal translation the binding obligation, the party to whom the report goes, and the deadline are the operative elements and must be preserved exactly. Voice, word order, and pronoun choice are surface features that may legitimately change in the target language.

Question 9Linguistic ability (target language translation)

When a source text contains a Latin maxim such as 'nulla poena sine lege', what is the recommended approach in an EU legal translation?

  1. Use the established conventional rendering of the maxim in the target legal culture. Correct answer.
  2. Always leave the Latin untranslated and add no gloss.
  3. Replace it with a plain-language explanation of the principle.
  4. Translate each Latin word separately and join them literally.

Explanation

Latin maxims have recognised equivalents in the legal traditions of EU languages, and the conventional rendering preserves both meaning and register. Leaving it untranslated may be acceptable in some genres but is not the general rule, and word-by-word rendering or paraphrase would distort the established formula.

Question 10Linguistic ability (target language translation)

Which of these is the clearest example of a translation error caused by 'source-language interference'?

  1. Adapting a culture-specific reference for the target audience.
  2. Copying the source's word order and collocations into a target sentence where they are unnatural. Correct answer.
  3. Using a target-language idiom that has no counterpart in the source.
  4. Adding a translator's footnote to explain an ambiguity.

Explanation

Source-language interference occurs when the translator transfers the source's syntax or collocations into the target, producing unnatural text. Idiomatic adaptation, cultural adaptation, and explanatory footnotes are deliberate strategies rather than interference errors.

Question 11Linguistic ability (target language translation)

A source sentence contains 'the Commission and the Council shall each adopt their own rules of procedure'. Which translation challenge is most salient?

  1. Determining whether to use a semicolon
  2. Choosing between formal and informal address forms
  3. Ensuring that 'each' and the plural possessive 'their' are correctly resolved for two distinct institutions Correct answer.
  4. Deciding whether to translate 'rules' as 'regulations'

Explanation

The distributive 'each' with a plural possessive requires the translator to make clear that both institutions separately adopt their own rules. Address forms, terminological substitution, and punctuation are not the central issue in this construction.

Question 12Linguistic ability (target language translation)

In EU translation, what does the principle of 'multilingual equality' imply for a translator?

  1. Translations may vary in meaning as long as style is preserved.
  2. Only the language of the original draft has legal force.
  3. All language versions are equally authentic, so each must convey the same legal meaning. Correct answer.
  4. The source language version always prevails in case of divergence.

Explanation

EU legislation is equally authentic in all its language versions, which means each version must carry the same legal effect. This places a premium on exact terminological and semantic equivalence rather than on stylistic fidelity alone.

Question 13Linguistic ability (target language translation)

A source text says 'the measure shall enter into force on the twentieth day following that of its publication'. Which rendering best preserves the legal computation rule?

  1. The measure takes effect within twenty days of publication.
  2. The measure shall enter into force on the twentieth day following that of its publication. Correct answer.
  3. The measure will be in force from about twenty days after it is published.
  4. The measure enters into force twenty days after publication.

Explanation

The rule specifies a precise counting method: the twentieth day following the day of publication, with the day of publication excluded. Retaining the exact formulation avoids the ambiguity introduced by 'after', 'about', or 'within', which change the computation.

Question 14Linguistic ability (target language translation)

Which target-language feature most often requires restructuring when translating English EU texts that use long noun stacks such as 'the internal market harmonisation measure implementation report'?

  1. The target language's lack of a passive voice
  2. The target language's preference for prepositional or relative-clause expansion Correct answer.
  3. The target language's use of a different alphabet
  4. The absence of articles in the target language

Explanation

Many languages cannot stack nouns as English does and instead expand the compound into prepositional phrases or relative clauses. Article absence, script differences, and voice inventory are unrelated to the need to unpack noun stacks.

Question 15Linguistic ability (target language translation)

A translator must render 'the parties concerned' and 'the parties involved' in a single EU text. What is the safest approach?

  1. Use the same target term for both to ensure consistency.
  2. Alternate between two synonyms to avoid repetition.
  3. Choose the shorter of the two possible target terms in both cases.
  4. Check whether each phrase corresponds to a distinct defined concept and render accordingly. Correct answer.

Explanation

In EU texts, apparently similar phrases may correspond to distinct legal concepts with fixed equivalents, so the translator must verify each against the terminology source. Collapsing them into one term or alternating synonyms risks conflating distinct concepts.

Question 16Linguistic ability (target language translation)

Which statement best describes the role of the 'style guide' in EU translation work?

  1. It applies only to press releases, not to legislative texts.
  2. It sets conventions for register, capitalisation, and formatting that translators must follow. Correct answer.
  3. It replaces the terminology database for technical terms.
  4. It is advisory only and may be ignored when the source is clear.

Explanation

The style guide governs register, capitalisation, formatting, and similar editorial conventions across translated documents. It complements rather than replaces the terminology database, is binding rather than merely advisory, and applies across document types.

Question 17Linguistic ability (target language translation)

A source text uses 'should' in a non-binding recommendation. Which target rendering best preserves the distinction from 'shall' in the same document?

  1. Omit the modal entirely and use the present indicative.
  2. Use a target-language form expressing recommendation rather than obligation. Correct answer.
  3. Use the same mandatory form as for 'shall' to keep the text uniform.
  4. Replace it with 'must' to strengthen the statement.

Explanation

EU drafting distinguishes binding obligation ('shall') from recommendation ('should'), and the target must reproduce that distinction with an appropriate non-mandatory form. Using the mandatory form, dropping the modal, or strengthening to 'must' would all misstate the legal effect.

Question 18Linguistic ability (target language translation)

Which of the following best exemplifies a 'culture-specific' item requiring adaptation rather than literal translation in an EU communication?

  1. A reference to 'the European Parliament'
  2. A reference to a national school-leaving examination such as the French baccalauréat Correct answer.
  3. A reference to 'the euro'
  4. A reference to 'Article 114 TFEU'

Explanation

National qualifications and institutions such as the baccalauréat are culture-specific and often need explanation or adaptation for readers from other Member States. Treaty articles, EU institutions, and the single currency have fixed official equivalents and require no cultural adaptation.

Question 19Linguistic ability (target language translation)

A source sentence in an EU regulation reads: 'Member States may, in accordance with national law, provide for exemptions.' Which element must a faithful translation retain?

  1. The passive construction of the source
  2. The exact number of words in the source
  3. The permissive 'may' and the reference to national law as the governing framework Correct answer.
  4. The imperative force of the sentence

Explanation

'May' confers a discretion on Member States, and 'in accordance with national law' makes national law the governing framework; both are operative and must be preserved. The sentence is not imperative, and word count or voice are surface features.

Question 20Linguistic ability (target language translation)

In EU terminology work, what is the main function of a 'definition' attached to a term entry?

  1. To indicate the pronunciation of the term
  2. To provide a stylistic alternative for the translator
  3. To delimit the concept so that the correct equivalent can be selected Correct answer.
  4. To replace the target-language equivalent

Explanation

A definition in a terminological entry delimits the concept, allowing the translator to match it to the correct equivalent in the target language. It is not a stylistic variant, a pronunciation guide, or a substitute for the equivalent itself.

Question 21Linguistic ability (target language translation)

A source text contains an ambiguous pronoun: 'The Commission informed the Council that it had approved the draft.' Which approach best serves the translator's task?

  1. Resolve the ambiguity in line with the surrounding context or the source's intent, and make the referent explicit if needed. Correct answer.
  2. Delete the clause to avoid the problem.
  3. Preserve the ambiguity exactly as in the source.
  4. Choose arbitrarily between the two possible referents.

Explanation

Where a pronoun is ambiguous, the translator should use context or the drafter's intent to determine the referent and, if necessary, make it explicit in the target. Preserving ambiguity, choosing arbitrarily, or deleting content all compromise the accuracy of the translation.

Question 22Linguistic ability (target language translation)

Which of the following best describes 'register' as a factor in EU translation?

  1. The level of formality and the conventions of the text type, which must be matched in the target Correct answer.
  2. The legal hierarchy of the instrument being translated
  3. The number of languages into which the text is translated
  4. The physical layout of the document on the page

Explanation

Register concerns the level of formality and the conventions appropriate to the text type, which the translator must reproduce in the target. Layout, the number of target languages, and the legal hierarchy of the instrument are distinct concepts.

Question 23Linguistic ability (target language translation)

A source text uses an acronym defined at first mention, 'the European Food Safety Authority (EFSA)'. What is the standard translation practice?

  1. Translate the full name and use the target-language acronym if one exists, otherwise retain the source acronym. Correct answer.
  2. Translate the full name and retain the source acronym in brackets.
  3. Use only the source acronym throughout without translating the full name.
  4. Replace the acronym with a descriptive phrase each time.

Explanation

The full name is translated using the official designation, and the acronym follows the target-language convention: a target acronym where one exists, otherwise the source acronym. Retaining the source acronym in brackets regardless, or omitting the full name, departs from standard practice.

Question 24Linguistic ability (target language translation)

A translator is asked to render an EU text into a language in which a key legal concept has no exact equivalent. Which strategy is most appropriate?

  1. Invent a new word without explanation.
  2. Use the source-language term without comment.
  3. Omit the concept entirely.
  4. Use the closest established equivalent, adding a brief explanation if the concept is essential. Correct answer.

Explanation

When no exact equivalent exists, the translator uses the closest established equivalent and, where the concept is essential, adds a brief explanation to preserve meaning. Inventing unexplained terms, omitting the concept, or leaving it unexplained all reduce the accuracy of the translation.

Question 25Linguistic ability (target language translation)

Which of the following best explains why EU translators often use 'parallel texts' in the target language?

  1. To copy the source text's sentence structure directly
  2. To verify the source text's legal validity
  3. To observe the conventional phrasing and terminology used in comparable target-language documents Correct answer.
  4. To replace the need for a terminology database

Explanation

Parallel texts are comparable documents in the target language that show conventional phrasing, collocations, and terminology for a given text type. They are not a template for copying syntax, do not replace the terminology database, and do not assess the source's legal validity.

Question 26Linguistic ability (target language translation)

An EU translator working into Italian encounters the English verb 'shall' in a regulation addressed to Member States. Which Italian rendering best preserves the binding obligation of the source?

  1. potrebbe
  2. dovrebbe
  3. può
  4. deve Correct answer.

Explanation

In binding EU legislation 'shall' expresses a strict obligation, and Italian legislative drafting conventionally renders this with the indicative 'deve'. Modal verbs such as 'può' or the conditional 'dovrebbe' would weaken the obligation and misstate the norm.

Question 27Linguistic ability (target language translation)

A German-language target text must render the English term 'stakeholder consultation'. Which German term is the established EU usage for this procedural step?

  1. Beratung der Behörden
  2. Zustimmung der Mitglieder
  3. Befragung der Aktionäre
  4. Anhörung der Interessenträger Correct answer.

Explanation

EU German terminology uses 'Interessenträger' for stakeholders and 'Anhörung' for consultation, so 'Anhörung der Interessenträger' matches the institutional concept. The other options shift the meaning towards shareholders, public authorities or members' consent.

Question 28Linguistic ability (target language translation)

In a French target text, which rendering correctly conveys the English 'the entry into force of this Regulation'?

  1. la publication du présent règlement
  2. la ratification du présent règlement
  3. l'entrée en vigueur du présent règlement Correct answer.
  4. l'application du présent règlement

Explanation

'Entrée en vigueur' is the fixed French legal phrase for entry into force, and 'le présent règlement' is the standard self-reference. Publication and application are distinct stages and must not be substituted.

Question 29Linguistic ability (target language translation)

A source sentence reads 'The Agency shall be assisted by a committee.' Which Spanish passive construction is the most idiomatic EU rendering?

  1. La Agencia es asistida por un comité.
  2. La Agencia será asistida por un comité.
  3. La Agencia contará con la asistencia de un comité. Correct answer.
  4. La Agencia ha sido asistida por un comité.

Explanation

Spanish EU drafting avoids the passive with 'ser' plus participle where an active or verbal-periphrasis construction reads more naturally. 'Contará con la asistencia de' preserves the future obligation while sounding idiomatic.

Question 30Linguistic ability (target language translation)

Which English source phrase is correctly matched with its standard Polish EU term for 'Member State'?

  1. kraj związkowy
  2. region administracyjny
  3. państwo członkowskie Correct answer.
  4. państwo stowarzyszone

Explanation

'Państwo członkowskie' is the fixed Polish equivalent of 'Member State' in the Treaties and secondary legislation. The other expressions denote federal states, associated states or administrative regions.

Question 31Linguistic ability (target language translation)

A source text uses 'whereas' to open a recital. Which target-language convention should the translator follow?

  1. Replace the recital with a numbered article for clarity.
  2. Omit the recital opener because recitals carry no legal effect.
  3. Use the target language's fixed recital formula, such as 'considérant' in French or 'in Erwägung nachstehender Gründe' in German. Correct answer.
  4. Translate 'whereas' literally as a temporal conjunction meaning 'while'.

Explanation

Recitals have a fixed formulaic opener in each EU language, and translators must use the established equivalent rather than a literal temporal reading. Recitals are structurally distinct from articles and must not be renumbered or dropped.

Question 32Linguistic ability (target language translation)

When translating an EU text, a translator meets the abbreviation 'OJ'. What does it stand for and how should it be handled?

  1. Official Journal, rendered with the target language's established equivalent such as 'JO' or 'ABl.' Correct answer.
  2. Open Justice, kept unchanged in all languages.
  3. Ordinary Jurisdiction, translated as a court term.
  4. Organisation of Judges, expanded at first mention.

Explanation

'OJ' stands for Official Journal, and each EU language has its own fixed abbreviation, for example 'JO' in French and 'ABl.' in German. Institutional abbreviations are rendered with the target-language convention rather than left in English.

Question 33Linguistic ability (target language translation)

A source sentence reads 'The Commission shall adopt delegated acts.' Which French term is the established equivalent of 'delegated acts'?

  1. actes juridiques
  2. actes délégués Correct answer.
  3. actes administratifs
  4. actes d'exécution

Explanation

'Actes délégués' is the Treaty term for delegated acts under Article 290 TFEU. 'Actes d'exécution' refers to implementing acts under Article 291, a different legal instrument.

Question 34Linguistic ability (target language translation)

A source text contains the term 'comitology'. Which approach best reflects good practice when rendering it into an EU target language?

  1. Leave the English word unchanged and add a footnote.
  2. Coin a literal calque of 'comitology' because no equivalent exists.
  3. Replace it with 'committee meeting' to simplify for readers.
  4. Use the established target-language term for the committee procedure system rather than a literal calque of 'comitology'. Correct answer.

Explanation

'Comitology' has settled equivalents in EU languages referring to the committee procedure system, and translators should use them. A literal calque or an explanatory simplification would depart from institutional terminology.

Question 35Linguistic ability (target language translation)

A source sentence reads 'Without prejudice to Article 5, Member States may derogate from this rule.' Which rendering best preserves the legal relationship between the two clauses?

  1. A rendering that merges both clauses into one simple sentence.
  2. A target rendering that keeps the reservation clause clearly subordinate to the main permission, using the target language's fixed formula for 'without prejudice to'. Correct answer.
  3. A rendering that turns the reservation into a condition introduced by 'if'.
  4. A rendering that moves the reservation to a footnote.

Explanation

'Without prejudice to' is a reservation clause that preserves the other provision's applicability, and each EU language has a fixed formula for it. Merging, converting it into a condition, or relegating it to a footnote alters the legal effect.

Question 36Linguistic ability (target language translation)

A translator must render 'the Commission' and 'the Council' consistently in a target language that distinguishes grammatical gender in adjectives. What is the main risk to manage?

  1. Agreement errors when pronouns or adjectives refer back to the two institutions with different genders. Correct answer.
  2. Loss of the capital letter on institution names.
  3. Inability to translate the definite article.
  4. Confusion between singular and plural verb forms only.

Explanation

When institutions carry different grammatical genders, anaphoric pronouns and adjectives must agree with the correct antecedent, which is a frequent source of error. Capitalisation and articles are secondary matters that do not affect legal reference.

Question 37Linguistic ability (target language translation)

A source paragraph uses the English gerund 'having regard to' to open the legal basis. Which translation strategy is correct?

  1. Render it as a causal conjunction meaning 'because'.
  2. Translate the gerund as a progressive verb form to reflect ongoing action.
  3. Use the fixed target-language formula for citing the legal basis, since this opener is a standardised element. Correct answer.
  4. Drop the opener because the legal basis appears elsewhere.

Explanation

'Having regard to' is a formulaic opener introducing the legal basis, and every EU language has a set equivalent. Treating it as a progressive or causal expression misreads its function in the act's structure.

Question 38Linguistic ability (target language translation)

A source sentence reads 'The rapporteur presented the draft opinion to the committee.' Which target rendering best reflects the correct institutional roles?

  1. A rendering that translates 'rapporteur' as 'reporter' in the journalistic sense.
  2. A rendering that omits the committee as the recipient.
  3. A rendering that turns 'draft opinion' into 'draft regulation'.
  4. A rendering that keeps 'rapporteur' as the designated member and 'draft opinion' as the committee document, using established equivalents. Correct answer.

Explanation

In EU committee work a rapporteur is the designated member who drafts an opinion, and 'draft opinion' is a specific document type. Journalistic 'reporter', 'draft regulation' or omitting the recipient all distort the procedure.

Question 39Linguistic ability (target language translation)

A source text uses the definite article generically: 'The employer shall ensure a safe working environment.' Which target-language issue most needs attention?

  1. Whether the sentence needs a semicolon.
  2. Whether the target language uses the definite article, a bare noun or a plural to express generic reference. Correct answer.
  3. Whether the verb should be in the subjunctive.
  4. Whether 'employer' should be capitalised.

Explanation

Generic reference is expressed differently across EU languages, for instance with a bare noun or a plural where English uses 'the'. The translator must choose the target-language pattern that keeps the generic scope.

Question 40Linguistic ability (target language translation)

A source sentence contains a long premodifying noun phrase: 'the cross-border health-care patient mobility framework'. What is the most reliable translation strategy?

  1. Preserve the English word order exactly to keep fidelity.
  2. Unpack the compound into its logical relations and rebuild it with the target language's own means, such as prepositional phrases. Correct answer.
  3. Translate each noun separately and join them with hyphens.
  4. Shorten the phrase to 'the framework' throughout.

Explanation

English noun stacking compresses relations that many target languages must express with prepositions or relative clauses. Copying the order produces opaque text, while hyphen-joining or truncating loses meaning.

Question 41Linguistic ability (target language translation)

A translator must render 'the Committee delivered its opinion by unanimity'. Which target rendering best preserves the procedural meaning?

  1. A rendering that says the opinion was merely discussed.
  2. A rendering that describes a majority vote instead.
  3. A rendering that omits how the opinion was adopted.
  4. A rendering using the target language's fixed term for a unanimous committee opinion. Correct answer.

Explanation

'By unanimity' specifies the voting rule, and the target text must use the established term for unanimous adoption. Majority, mere discussion or omission all misstate the procedural outcome.

Question 42Linguistic ability (target language translation)

A source text refers to 'the acquis communautaire'. How should a translator handle this term in a modern EU text?

  1. Replace it with 'EU law' in every occurrence without comment.
  2. Use the established target-language equivalent, noting that current drafting often prefers 'acquis' or 'Union acquis'. Correct answer.
  3. Leave the Latin phrase untranslated in all languages.
  4. Translate it word for word as 'community achievements'.

Explanation

The term has settled equivalents in EU languages, and contemporary drafting tends to use 'acquis' or 'Union acquis' after the Lisbon Treaty. A word-for-word rendering or blanket substitution loses terminological precision.

Question 43Linguistic ability (target language translation)

A source sentence uses 'should' in a non-binding code of conduct. Which target strategy best preserves the difference from binding 'shall' in the same document?

  1. Render both 'should' and 'shall' with the same obligation verb for consistency.
  2. Omit 'should' because codes of conduct are non-binding.
  3. Translate 'should' as a past tense of 'shall'.
  4. Use the target language's established rendering for recommendations, distinct from the imperative used for obligations. Correct answer.

Explanation

Non-binding instruments use a distinct modal register, and the target text must keep recommendations separate from obligations. Using one verb for both, a past-tense reading or omission all erase the intended normative difference.

Question 44Linguistic ability (target language translation)

A source sentence reads 'The Agency may delegate certain tasks to the Commission.' Which target rendering best preserves the direction of delegation?

  1. A rendering that clearly shows the Agency as the delegating body and the Commission as the recipient. Correct answer.
  2. A rendering that reverses the roles so the Commission delegates to the Agency.
  3. A rendering that makes delegation mutual.
  4. A rendering that omits the recipient to shorten the sentence.

Explanation

The source assigns the power to delegate to the Agency and names the Commission as recipient, and the target text must preserve that direction exactly. Reversing, mutualising or omitting the recipient changes who holds the power.

Question 45Linguistic ability (target language translation)

A source text uses the English term 'guidelines' in a document that also contains 'rules' and 'recommendations'. Which translation approach is soundest?

  1. Assign each term a distinct target-language equivalent and apply it consistently, since the source treats them as different instruments. Correct answer.
  2. Use one target term for all three to simplify the text.
  3. Translate 'guidelines' as 'rules' because they are often followed.
  4. Leave all three terms in English to avoid confusion.

Explanation

When a source distinguishes instrument types, the target text must preserve those distinctions with separate, consistently applied equivalents. Collapsing the terms or leaving them in English undermines the legal clarity of the document.

Question 46Linguistic ability (target language translation)

A source sentence reads 'Member States shall designate the authorities competent to carry out the checks referred to in Article 12.' Which translation challenge is most significant?

  1. Choosing between two synonyms for 'checks'.
  2. Keeping the cross-reference to Article 12 accurate while placing the relative clause naturally in the target language. Correct answer.
  3. Deciding whether to capitalise 'Member States'.
  4. Deciding whether to use a comma before the relative clause.

Explanation

The critical issue is preserving an exact cross-reference and restructuring the long relative clause so it reads naturally without altering scope. Capitalisation, synonym choice and comma placement are secondary stylistic matters.

Question 47Linguistic ability (target language translation)

A source text uses 'the former' and 'the latter' after naming two institutions in the previous sentence. Which translation risk is greatest?

  1. The target language may lack equivalents for 'former' and 'latter'.
  2. The pronouns may need capitalisation.
  3. The target text may lose the antecedent mapping if the sentence is restructured or the institutions' order changes. Correct answer.
  4. The sentence may become too short.

Explanation

'The former' and 'the latter' depend entirely on the order of the two antecedents, so restructuring can silently swap the referents. The translator must verify that the target order matches the intended institutions.

Question 48Linguistic ability (target language translation)

A source sentence reads 'Save as otherwise provided in this Regulation, the Agency shall publish the register.' Which target rendering best preserves the exception clause?

  1. A rendering that turns the exception into a general disclaimer at the end of the article.
  2. A rendering that keeps the exception clearly scoped to the publication duty, using the target language's fixed formula for 'save as otherwise provided'. Correct answer.
  3. A rendering that drops the exception because the duty is clear.
  4. A rendering that converts the exception into a permission for the Agency.

Explanation

'Save as otherwise provided' carves out an exception limited to the specific duty, and each EU language has a fixed formula for it. Moving, dropping or converting it into a permission changes the scope of the obligation.

Question 49Linguistic ability (target language translation)

A translator renders a provision containing both 'may' and 'shall' into a target language whose modal system does not map one-to-one onto English. What is the soundest approach?

  1. Consult the source-language grammar only, ignoring the instrument type.
  2. Map 'may' always to one verb and 'shall' always to another, regardless of context.
  3. Determine the legal effect of each modal from context and the instrument's type, then select target modals that reproduce discretion versus obligation. Correct answer.
  4. Use the same modal for both to avoid inconsistency.

Explanation

Where modal systems diverge, the translator must establish whether each occurrence confers discretion or imposes an obligation and choose target forms accordingly. Mechanical one-to-one mapping or merging the modals can misstate legal effect.

Question 50Linguistic ability (target language translation)

A source paragraph contains an ambiguous scope for a final sentence: 'This shall apply to all operators concerned.' Which course of action best reflects professional practice?

  1. Resolve the scope from the surrounding provisions and, if genuine ambiguity remains, query the requester rather than guessing in the target text. Correct answer.
  2. Reproduce the ambiguity by translating the sentence as vaguely as possible.
  3. Choose the broadest possible reading so no operator is excluded.
  4. Choose the narrowest reading to limit obligations.

Explanation

Professional practice is to resolve ambiguity from context and, where it persists, raise a query with the author or requester. Deliberately choosing a broad or narrow reading, or reproducing vagueness, imports a legal decision the translator is not entitled to make.