Galicia PAU English - First Foreign Language study materials
Galicia PAU English - First Foreign Language study resources

Improving an Off-Topic Opinion Essay

Galicia PAU English - First Foreign Language · Put your knowledge to work in context.

All case studies

Improving an Off-Topic Opinion Essay

Writing prompt: Your school magazine asks: 'Should Santiago de Compostela limit the number of tourist apartments in the old town?' Write an opinion essay of 120-150 words, giving reasons and a conclusion. Candidate draft (78 words): 'I think tourism is bad because a lot of people come and things are expensive. In Santiago there are many tourists and they make noise. Also I went to the beach last summer and it was full of people. The old town is nice but I don't like crowds. We should stop all tourism because it is bad for the city. In conclusion, tourism is a problem.' The candidate has 45 minutes and must improve the draft without changing the topic.

1. Diagnose three problems with the draft in relation to the prompt and the 120-150 word requirement. Be specific.

Read the worked answer
  1. Off-topic material: the beach anecdote does not address tourist apartments in Santiago's old town. It may be true, but it does not answer the question.

  2. Overgeneralised and extreme position: 'stop all tourism' ignores jobs and residents' dependence on visitors, and there is no concession or counterargument. An opinion essay needs a defensible position, not a slogan.

  3. Underdeveloped and under length: 78 words is far below 120-150; there is no paragraphing, no clear conclusion with a recommendation, and vague wording such as 'things are expensive'. The essay also uses informal 'a lot of' instead of a more precise phrase.

2. Rewrite the draft as a model 120-150 word essay with clear paragraphing, a concession, and a conclusion. Then list two linking devices you used and their function.

Read the worked answer

Santiago de Compostela's old town is one of Galicia's greatest assets, but the growth of tourist apartments has created real tensions. I believe the city should limit them, though not ban them outright.

Firstly, residents are being pushed out. When flats become short-term lets, rents rise and local families move away, which empties the historic centre of everyday life. Secondly, uncontrolled tourism can damage the very atmosphere visitors come to see: narrow streets become crowded and noise increases at night.

However, tourism supports jobs in bars, guides and shops. A cap should therefore be gradual: license new apartments only in certain streets, inspect them, and use the income to fund affordable housing.

In conclusion, limiting tourist apartments is not anti-tourism; it is a way to protect Santiago's old town for both residents and visitors.

Linking devices: Firstly/Secondly sequence the reasons; However introduces a concession; therefore marks a consequence; In conclusion signals the closing judgement.

3. What two additions would raise the word count to 120-150 without padding?

Read the worked answer

Add concrete consequences and a brief counterargument with a rebuttal. For example, explain one effect of short-term lets on local rents or on the number of family-run shops, then acknowledge that tourism provides employment and answer that a cap can be gradual rather than a total ban. These additions develop the argument rather than repeat it; they also supply the specific detail that the original draft lacks.