Reading comprehension: specific information and inference
Domain 2 - Reading comprehension: specific information and inference. This domain covers questions that send you back into the text: locating a fact, deciding whether a statement is true or false and justifying the answer, and drawing a conclusion the text supports but does not state directly. In the PAU, justification questions usually require a quotation or close paraphrase; a bare 'True' or 'False' earns little.
Scanning for detail
- identify the key word in the question, then look for a synonym in the text
- read the sentence before and after the match
- watch for negation, concession and comparatives: 'although', 'unless', 'fewer than', 'not only'
True/False with justification
- decide against the text, not against your opinion
- if true, quote the clause that proves it
- if false, quote the clause that contradicts it
- copy accurately; do not invent a quotation
Inference
- an inference is a conclusion the text implies, not information you add
- ask which sentence the author would sign
- eliminate options that contain unsupported extra details, especially numbers, causes or intentions
Worked example
Text: 'Although the town opened a new cycle lane last spring, cycling to school has fallen by 8% because the lane stops 500 metres before the school gate.' Statement: 'The cycle lane directly connects homes to the school.' Answer: False. Justification: 'the lane stops 500 metres before the school gate.' Reasoning: 'directly connects' is contradicted by the stopping point. A weak answer would quote only 'opened a new cycle lane last spring', which does not address the connection. Inference question: Why has cycling fallen? The text implies the route is incomplete; it does not say children dislike cycling or that the lane is dangerous. Choose the option about the missing section, not the plausible but unsupported one.
Traps
- answering from general knowledge instead of the text
- quoting a sentence that only partly supports the claim
- treating 'not stated' as 'false' without checking
- over-inferring motives or causes
- ignoring 'according to the text'