A familiar four-item list and a changed current deployment requirement
A fictional designer reviews an older ArcGIS Enterprise teaching diagram listing four software product types. The intended new deployment uses a later release whose supplied primary documentation also specifies object-store support and permits a supported load-balancer alternative to Web Adaptors. A colleague proposes treating the old list as a complete timeless installation checklist. Another separates historical product-family terminology, current release requirements, component instances and the actual selected platform. This written case installs no software and changes no architecture. The learner must identify which universal claim is unsupported and explain how a current supported design should trace real workflow and compatibility requirements rather than merely reproduce a familiar diagram.
1. What is wrong with the timeless checklist claim?
Read the worked answer
The relevant product requirements changed, and a count of old software types does not establish current store/proxy requirements or component instances.
2. What should the design review establish?
Read the worked answer
Use the intended release/platform documentation, actual workload, licensing, storage and request paths. State versioned examples explicitly and verify the supported selected configuration.