Investigating Child Labor at the Barton Mill
A student group investigates the question: 'Did the opening of the Barton textile mill in 1885 increase child labor in the town?' They have four sources: (1) the 1880 and 1890 federal census, which list occupations but may undercount children; (2) a 1886 factory inspector's report noting 37 children under 14 working in the mill; (3) a company newsletter from 1886 praising the mill's 'family-friendly' employment; and (4) a 1935 oral history from a former worker who recalls starting at age 12. The census shows the town's population rising from 4,200 to 6,800. The inspector's report covers only the Barton mill, not other employers. The newsletter does not mention ages. The oral history was recorded 50 years later. The students must present a conclusion supported by evidence, not just a strong opinion.
1. Evaluate the reliability of each source for answering the question. Address bias, proximity, and completeness.
Read the worked answer
The census is systematic and covers the whole town, but it may undercount child labor because families hid ages or listed children as 'at school' or 'at home'; it is useful for trends. The 1886 inspector's report is close in time and based on direct observation, but it covers only the Barton mill, so it cannot prove town-wide change. The company newsletter is contemporary but biased: it promotes the mill and does not give ages, so it is weak evidence for child labor. The 1935 oral history gives a worker's lived experience and details, but memory after 50 years can be selective, and one worker cannot represent all children. The sources should be used together, not ranked by a single criterion.
2. Explain how the student group could use corroboration to reach a more defensible conclusion.
Read the worked answer
The group should compare the 1880 and 1890 census occupations for children in the town and in nearby towns without a mill, to see whether the mill's opening changed patterns. They should check whether the inspector's 37 children match names or age patterns in the census and whether the oral history's account fits the mill's known start date. If the census, inspector, and oral history all point to children working at Barton, the claim that the mill employed child labor becomes stronger; if only one source does, the conclusion must be cautious. To answer 'increase' rather than 'presence,' they need before-and-after data and a comparison group. Corroboration across independent sources reduces the risk of relying on a biased newsletter or a single memory.
3. Identify one additional source that would strengthen the investigation and explain why.
Read the worked answer
State or local school enrollment records would help, because a sudden drop in child enrollment after 1885, especially among children aged 10 to 14, would support the claim that more children entered mill work. Attendance records could also show whether children left school for jobs. Alternatively, mill payroll records or state child-labor inspection reports would give direct evidence of ages and employment. The source should be independent of the company and close in time to 1885. School records have limits, since some children may have worked without leaving school or may not have attended school at all, but combined with the census and inspector's report they would make the conclusion more defensible.