A late chapter, a looming report and a struggling colleague
You manage a unit of seven in an EU agency. Your flagship annual report is due to the Management Board in five weeks. One policy officer, Ana, has delivered her chapter three weeks late, and the quality reviewer has flagged two factual errors in it. Ana has missed two internal deadlines this quarter and has twice cancelled one-to-ones at short notice; you know she has a sick parent in another country, though she has not formally asked for anything. Two other team members are covering parts of her work and have told you, one in writing, that they cannot sustain it; one said she is “not cleaning up after Ana again”. An appraisal dialogue is two months away. You hold a €15,000 budget for external support and there is one temporary-agent slot available from the start of next month. Your head of unit has asked you to “handle it” and does not want the report slipped.
1. What is your first move with Ana, and what should the conversation actually achieve?
Read the worked answer
The temptation is either to say nothing (she is clearly under strain, the report matters more) or to move straight to a formal performance conversation. Both fail: the first transfers the cost to the team and to the report's quality; the second punishes someone for a situation you have not yet established.
Prepare with evidence, not impressions. Bring the specific facts: the chapter three weeks late, the two flagged errors, two missed deadlines, two cancelled meetings. No adjectives, no diagnosis.
Open on the work, leave room for the cause. Ask an open question about how she is managing her portfolio, then, separately, whether there is anything affecting her work that she wants to raise. Do not name the sick parent - you may be wrong, and she may not want it on the record.
The conversation should produce four things: (1) a shared, written understanding of what she must deliver by when, with the chapter rescoped rather than simply late; (2) the support available - flexible working, the agency's psychosocial or occupational health service, HR's rules on family-related leave; (3) an explicit statement of the standard expected, delivered factually and without threat, so that nobody can later say they did not know; (4) a review date within seven days.
Do not promise confidentiality over the work problem itself, and do not promise to fix things you cannot.
In parallel, and before the meeting if possible, put an interim mitigation in place - a named second reader for her chapter - so you are not making the report hostage to the conversation.
2. The rest of the team is resentful and working overtime. How do you address that without breaching Ana's confidence?
Read the worked answer
Resentment that is left unaddressed does not stay quiet; it becomes an informal version of the story that you then cannot correct. But the answer is not to disclose Ana's circumstances.
Say something, soon, and to everyone. Call a short team meeting. Acknowledge the extra load explicitly and thank people by name. Explain only what is necessary: that you are aware of the situation, that you have a plan with Ana, that you have a review date, and that you will not discuss an individual's circumstances with the team - which is also the guarantee that applies to them.
Make the redistribution explicit and temporary. Vague “can you help out” requests become permanent. Write it down: who does what, until when, and that it will be revisited on a date. Resentment is often less about the work than about the sense that nobody has decided.
Use the money and the post deliberately. The €15,000 should go to the highest-risk item, not to quietly absorbing Ana's output: external copy-editing or a second quality pass on the whole report is defensible and visible to the team. Do not spend it on a ghost-writer for Ana without a plan, and do not use the temporary-agent slot to pre-empt the outcome of an appraisal process - that is a decision made without evidence.
Protect the deliverable by shrinking it. If overtime is sustained, decide what leaves the report's scope - an optional chapter, an annex - and tell the Management Board's secretariat early. A slightly thinner report on time is a better outcome than a full one delivered by an exhausted team.
3. Ana says the situation is personal and confidential and asks you to leave it alone until the appraisal in two months. What do you do?
Read the worked answer
You can respect the content without accepting the timetable. Two months is longer than the report and longer than the team can carry.
Separate what you need from what you do not. Say plainly that she does not have to tell you the reason; you need a workable plan and a date. That keeps her confidentiality intact while keeping the management problem yours.
Offer the legitimate routes: HR's provisions on family-related leave, flexible working arrangements, the medical service, staff counselling. Offer to make the HR contact yourself. If she wants an adjustment, it has to be requested through a channel that can actually grant it - you should not be running a private arrangement.
If nothing can change and the work cannot be delivered, move to the fair sequence rather than improvising: informal conversation, then written expectations with support and a review date, then HR advice, then the formal procedure. Do not skip to the formal stage because you are under pressure, and do not skip the written stage because you want to be kind; both unfairness and drift end in the same place.
Be transparent about the limit: “I will not share your circumstances with the team, but I cannot keep the effect on the team's work confidential, and I should not.” That is honest and it protects you both.
Interim decision. Whatever she decides, the report cannot depend on one person: rescope her chapter, name a second reader, and record the decision. If she later says she wanted to do more, the record should show what was asked of her rather than what was assumed.
Escalate laterally, not over her head: brief your head of unit on the management plan and its timeline, not on Ana's personal circumstances.