Six Students, One Installation
Six final-year EB Art students must install a group work titled Borderlands in a 6 m by 4 m alcove for the school exhibition. They have three weeks and EUR 150. The suspended ceiling grid is rated at 5 kg per fixing point; there is one double socket; the fire exit must stay clear. Proposals: 200 paper boats suspended with four fans; a looped audio piece of 20 migrant testimonies; a 300-tile clay wall weighing about 80 kg; and a floor chalk map for visitors. Two students want spectacle, one wants quiet reflection, one refuses to work with another after a dispute, and one has done no construction yet. The teacher must approve a final plan and assess individual contributions.
1. Propose a feasible final installation and allocation of the EUR 150 budget. Explain how it resolves the technical, safety, and group-conflict constraints.
Read the worked answer
A feasible plan is the suspended paper boats, the audio loop, and the floor chalk map; the clay wall should be dropped. The wall weighs about 80 kg, needs plinths, and would compromise the fire exit and the 5 kg ceiling limit. The boats can be distributed across at least eight fixing points, keeping each below 5 kg, with fire-retardant spray because paper is combustible. The audio needs one speaker and a laptop; the single double socket can run the fans and audio only with an RCD and cable ramps, and no cable may cross the exit route. A budget could be: paper and string EUR 25; four fans EUR 40; speaker and cables EUR 25; chalk EUR 10; fixings EUR 20; fire-retardant spray EUR 20; contingency EUR 10. The conflicting students should be separated into different tasks, with a written roles agreement and a daily ten-minute stand-up. The quiet student can edit the audio; the spectacle-oriented students can build and hang the boats. The chalk map must be placed away from the exit. The final work is coherent because the boats create a boundary above, the voices inhabit it, and the map lets visitors mark their own crossings.
2. How should the teacher assess individual achievement in a group installation without undermining collaboration?
Read the worked answer
Assess the group work through individual evidence, not a single shared mark. Each student should keep a contribution log, annotate photographs of their own tasks, and write a short reflective statement explaining one decision and one problem they solved. The teacher should observe and record specific actions: who measured the ceiling, who edited the audio, who negotiated the conflict, who tested the fixings. The installation itself can be assessed for coherence, but the examiner needs to see individual personal response and critical judgement. The student who refused to collaborate should not be penalised automatically; the teacher should document what mediation was offered and what that student contributed. A group critique before installation can help students articulate their roles. Photographs should identify individual work where possible. The final assessment should reward the quality of each portfolio and the evidence of resolved problems, not just the spectacle of the finished installation.