European Baccalaureate Art study materials
European Baccalaureate Art study resources

European Baccalaureate Art: Art (Visual Arts Option): Portfolio, Analysis and the B Examination

European Baccalaureate Art · Work through your exam, one topic at a time.

All guide sections

Art (Visual Arts Option): Portfolio, Analysis and the B Examination

The Art option in the European Baccalaureate assesses visual arts as a discipline of making and thinking. The A mark rewards sustained studio work in your portfolio and sketchbook; the B examination tests your ability to analyse works of art and to explain the decisions behind your own practice. It is not a memory test of dates: you must use evidence from images and from your own work.

The portfolio and sketchbook

Your portfolio should show a coherent inquiry, not a pile of unrelated exercises. Include a range of media and scales, but keep a through-line: a theme, a process, or a question you pursued. The sketchbook is assessed as a working document: annotated thumbnail compositions, colour tests, studies from observation, and notes on artists you have looked at. Label sources and note what you borrowed and why.

Analysing a work of art

Use a four-step structure: description (what is literally there), analysis (how it is put together: composition, tone, colour, mark, scale, viewpoint), interpretation (what it might mean, supported by visual evidence), evaluation (how effective it is, and why). Always tie context-patronage, function, movement, materials-to something you can see.

Defending your own work

Be ready to state your intention, the problems you met, the alternatives you rejected, and what you would do next. Refer to specific pages in the sketchbook and specific decisions in the final pieces.

Worked example

Question: compare a Renaissance portrait with a modern photographic portrait. A weak answer says, 'Both show a person; the first is old, the second is modern.' A strong answer starts with format and function (devotional or dynastic portrait versus self-fashioning or documentary); then composition (three-quarter turn and framing versus crop and direct gaze); then handling (smooth oil glazes versus the tonal range of the print); then context (commission and status versus authorship and reproduction). It concludes by evaluating how each constructs identity, using specific visual evidence.

Traps

  • Describing at length without analysing.
  • Ignoring the comparative instruction and writing two separate descriptions.
  • Using vague praise ('beautiful', 'nice colours') instead of technical vocabulary.
  • Including everything in the portfolio with no selection or reflection.
  • Failing to connect context to visual evidence.