CITO study materials
CITO study resources

An incident handover omits the active dependency

CITO · Put your knowledge to work in context.

All case studies

An incident handover omits the active dependency

A fictional overnight operator restores a service through an approved workaround. The incident ticket is marked resolved, but the service still depends on a temporary configuration and a vendor follow-up has not been completed. The next shift receives only a count of closed tickets and no note about the workaround, owner or return-to-normal conditions. A colleague says no handover detail is needed because the dashboard is green. Another proposes transferring the actual service state, evidence, remaining risk and pending actions. This written exercise changes no configuration or ticket. It asks why restored availability and complete problem resolution are different and which information should accompany an accountable operational handover.

1. What remains unresolved?

Read the worked answer

Immediate service restoration does not prove the underlying cause or temporary dependency is resolved. Follow-up ownership and supported return-to-normal conditions remain relevant.

2. What belongs in the handover?

Read the worked answer

Record affected service, actual workaround/state, evidence/time, current impact, owner, vendor action, monitoring and escalation/recovery conditions so the next shift understands pending responsibility.