Four Signatures on a Saturday Morning: Scope of a Basic Ground Instructor
Ramona holds a Basic Ground Instructor certificate and runs the Saturday ground school at a flying club. On one morning she is asked to sign four items. (1) Daniel, 17, finished her 42-hour private pilot ground course in March and has passed two practice tests; he wants the endorsement to take the FAA knowledge test on Monday. (2) Priya is training for an instrument rating, has studied entirely on her own, and wants her knowledge-test endorsement signed before the weekend. (3) Hal, a 58-year-old private pilot who last flew 26 months ago and has had no flight review since, asks Ramona to "do his flight review" so he can take his grandchildren up next weekend. (4) The club owner adds: "A ground instructor is an instructor - sign all of it and we'll sort out the details later." Ramona is not a flight instructor and holds no instrument rating on her ground instructor certificate. The club's chief flight instructor is away until Wednesday.
1. Which of the four requests can Ramona sign, and which must she refuse? Give your reasoning for each, not just the regulation number.
Read the worked answer
Daniel - sign it, conditionally. A Basic Ground Instructor may give ground training and endorse applicants for the knowledge test associated with a recreational, private, or commercial pilot certificate (14 CFR 61.215). But the 61.35 endorsement certifies that she provided the required ground training or reviewed his home study. Daniel was in her 42-hour course, so that is satisfied. She should confirm he meets the eligibility items in 61.103 (age 16 for private, English) and use current AC 61-65 endorsement wording.
Priya - refuse. A Basic Ground Instructor's privileges do not extend to the instrument rating knowledge test. That endorsement requires an instrument ground instructor, or a flight instructor with instrument privileges, or an ATP. Signing it would be an unauthorized endorsement; the testing center can reject it and the result can be invalidated.
Hal - partial. She may conduct and endorse the ground portion of the flight review only; the flight portion must be flown with an authorized flight instructor.
The owner's request - refuse. A ground instructor cannot simply sign everything; the certificate's privileges are specific, and a knowingly false endorsement is falsification (61.59).
2. Hal insists he is "basically current" because he flew a few months ago. What must actually happen before he can legally act as PIC with his grandchildren aboard, and what should Ramona write in his logbook?
Read the worked answer
Hal is missing more than one piece, and they must be untangled.
- Flight review (61.56). No person may act as PIC unless, within the preceding 24 months, they have completed a flight review. Hal's last one is outside 24 months, so he is not eligible to act as PIC at all right now - not even solo.
- Content of the review. At minimum one hour of ground training and one hour of flight training, covering the current Part 91 operating rules and those maneuvers the reviewer considers necessary.
- Who does what. Ramona can deliver and endorse the ground hour, but the hour of flight and the final sign-off require a flight instructor. Until both halves are complete, there is no flight review.
- Other prerequisites. A current medical (or BasicMed), and three takeoffs and landings in the preceding 90 days before carrying passengers.
Her logbook entry should state the date, her certificate number, the specific ground topics covered, and that this constitutes the ground portion of a flight review under 61.56(a). It should not read "flight review complete." Wording that overstates what she did is the whole risk.
3. The owner pushes back: "Nobody audits logbooks, and the kid needs his test Monday." How would you handle this as the instructor, and what is actually at stake?
Read the worked answer
Separate the pressure from the decision, then make the consequence concrete.
What is at stake. An endorsement is a legal certification by the signer. An endorsement given without the authority or without the underlying training is falsification under 61.59, which exposes Ramona's ground instructor certificate to suspension or revocation - and she loses the teaching work entirely. For the applicant, an endorsement that does not match the instructor's privileges can cause the knowledge test to be refused or the result invalidated, which costs more time than waiting two days for the chief instructor.
What to do. Decline in writing and in plain language, offer the alternatives that actually exist (schedule Priya with an instrument ground instructor or a CFII; schedule Hal's flight portion for Wednesday), and document who asked for what and when. Explain that the school's reputation with the FSDO rests on clean endorsements.
Check yourself first. Before signing anything, a ground instructor must also satisfy the recent-experience requirements of 61.217. If Ramona has not met them, none of the signatures are valid regardless of the applicant.