FAA MEI study materials
FAA MEI study resources

The Student Who Blames the Trim

FAA MEI · Put your knowledge to work in context.

All case studies

The Student Who Blames the Trim

Your student, a 34-year-old civil engineer, has 38 hours and soloed at 22. His landings were consistent at 15 hours, but over the last six lessons his flare has become progressively later and his final approach speed has crept from 65 to 75 knots. Today, after floating half the runway, you say, "Your approach was 10 knots fast and you flared about 15 feet too low." He snaps back, "The trim is rigged wrong - the last instructor said the same thing and nobody here can agree," then stops answering and won't make eye contact. He has prepaid for 10 more hours, wants to finish before a family trip in three weeks, and has been flying twice a week. You started at 0600, this is your sixth hour of instruction today, and you have three more students scheduled.

1. What is happening, and how do you handle the next ten minutes?

Read the worked answer

Two things are happening at once. The student is showing a defense mechanism - rationalization (the airplane is at fault) followed by withdrawal - and your critique landed at the worst possible moment: immediately after a frustrating landing, in the airplane, with no time to process it.

Handle it this way:

  • Do not argue about the trim on the ramp. Make the claim checkable instead: after shutdown, have him show you the trim setting and the approach speed he used, and write up the discrepancy for maintenance if he genuinely believes it. That respects him and settles the question objectively.
  • Stop teaching. Take a break; do not try to salvage the lesson in the airplane or in front of other people.
  • Separate the person from the performance. Criticize the approach speed, not the student.
  • Look at yourself. Sixth hour of instruction, three students still to go - fatigue shortens your tolerance and coarsens your critique, and this student needed a short, specific correction thirty minutes earlier.

Defer the substantive debrief to a scheduled ground session within a day or two, when both of you are fresh.

2. Is this a learning plateau, a bad habit, or something else? How do you restructure the next three lessons?

Read the worked answer

Treat it as a plateau with a habit forming on top of it. A plateau - a period of no apparent progress in skill acquisition - is normal and usually traces to loss of motivation, fatigue, insufficient variety of practice, a shift to a more demanding phase of the skill, or a poorly modeled technique. Here the drift from 65 to 75 knots suggests repetition without correction: he is practicing the error, and practice builds habits whether or not they are correct.

Restructure:

  • Go back to the last point of success. Fly approaches to a target airspeed and an aim point with no landing required, and make him call airspeed at 500, 300, and 100 ft.
  • Break the landing into parts: configuration and speed control, aim-point discipline, roundout and flare, touchdown and braking. Fix one per flight.
  • Demonstrate, then have him imitate. A demonstration he can see beats another paragraph of critique.
  • Shorten the critique to one item per landing, delivered after the rollout, not in the flare.
  • Set measurable goals he can hit: airspeed within ±5 kt at 200 ft AGL, flare initiated at the right attitude, three of four landings acceptable.

Change conditions if needed - a different runway, a calmer day - so success is achievable and visible.

3. How do the three-week deadline and the prepaid hours affect what you do, and what are your obligations?

Read the worked answer

The deadline is his; the endorsement is yours. The two do not negotiate with each other.

Obligations:

  • Say it early. Tell him now that the timeline depends on the plateau resolving, and what "resolved" will look like. Finding out in week three is what turns a plateau into a grievance.
  • Address the prepayment directly. Prepaid hours create an expectation of progress; progress is bought with corrected practice, not with hours. Offer to hold or refund unused hours if the schedule changes.
  • Document. Log the training and note the specific deficiency and the remediation. Keep the chief instructor informed, particularly if the trim complaint is repeated.
  • Do not sign what isn't true. Signing off a practical test endorsement because a trip is coming is the one outcome that can't be undone.
  • Consider a change of instructor. A different voice sometimes breaks a plateau faster than a new technique - but frame it as a plateau strategy, not as blame, and hand over your notes.

And fix your own scheduling: a sixth hour of instruction in a day with three to go is exactly when a plateau gets mishandled.