Priya's Later Start Times Essay: Revising an Argument
Priya is revising an argumentative essay for Mr. Grant's Grade 8 class. Her thesis is: 'Middle schools should start at 9:00 a.m. because students need more sleep.' She supports it with a survey of 120 students at her own school, in which 78% said they feel tired during first period, and with a story about her brother falling asleep in class. Her counterclaim paragraph says: 'Some people say later start times would hurt sports, and they are right; sports are more important than sleep.' She also includes a paragraph about cafeteria food that does not connect to the thesis. Mr. Grant asks her to revise for purpose and cohesion rather than add length. The final essay must be 700-900 words and use at least two credible sources. Priya has time to add one source from the district website, which reports a 3,000-student survey, or to interview her coach.
1. Which revision would most improve the argument: deleting the counterclaim, conceding fully to it, or qualifying and rebutting it? Explain your choice using Priya's purpose.
Read the worked answer
Qualifying and rebutting the counterclaim is the strongest revision. Deleting it would make the essay seem one-sided and would ignore a real concern that her audience may already have. Conceding fully, as the draft does, actually undermines the thesis: if sports are 'more important than sleep,' then the essay has given away its main claim. Qualifying means acknowledging that later start times could affect practice schedules, then answering the concern with evidence or a reasonable solution, such as adjusted practice times or districts that have managed the change. This serves Priya's purpose because an argumentative essay should take a clear position while showing awareness of opposing views. The rebuttal should return the reader to the thesis: student sleep and academic performance matter, and scheduling concerns can be addressed rather than treated as decisive.
2. Rewrite Priya's counterclaim sentence so that it acknowledges the concern without abandoning her thesis.
Read the worked answer
A revised sentence could read: 'Some people argue that a 9:00 a.m. start would disrupt sports schedules; however, schools can adjust practice times, and the academic benefits of added sleep are worth the scheduling work.' This version acknowledges the objection ('some people argue') but does not say the objectors are simply right. The word 'however' signals a rebuttal, and the clause about adjusting practice times offers a response rather than a concession. The final clause returns to Priya's thesis about academic benefits. A strong revision should keep a respectful tone toward the opposing view; the goal is not to mock sports supporters but to show that their concern has been considered and can be balanced against the benefits of later start times.
3. Priya can add either the district survey of 3,000 students or an interview with her coach. Which should she choose, and how should she evaluate the evidence she already has?
Read the worked answer
Priya should choose the district survey because it directly strengthens her thesis with broader evidence. Her current survey of 120 students at one school is relevant but limited; 78% is a striking number, but readers may ask whether her school represents the district. A 3,000-student survey can show whether the pattern is wider, and it comes from a credible source. The coach interview could help her address the sports counterclaim, but it would not provide the same breadth of evidence for the sleep claim. Priya should also recognize that her brother's story is the weakest evidence because it is a single anecdote; it can illustrate the problem, but it cannot establish a pattern. She should keep the anecdote brief and place the stronger survey evidence first.