Language ability and the stated right
A learner reads the 2003 Northern Sámi section 4 passage alongside the aligned meaning used in this independent resource. The passage first describes the right to use Sámi in one's own matter or a matter in which one is heard before a covered authority. It then states that knowledge of another language, giving Finnish and Swedish as examples, is not a ground for restricting the described right. A draft analytical paragraph says the right exists only if the person cannot speak Finnish. The learner must identify the precise change introduced by that paragraph and construct an evidence-based correction. The exercise concerns the meaning of this dated source, not a determination of a real person's current legal case.
1. Explain the source-based reasoning problem.
Read the worked answer
The draft adds a condition that the passage expressly rejects. The correction should preserve the described right without making inability to speak Finnish a prerequisite.
2. Give a careful analytical response and its limit.
Read the worked answer
Cite the section and the relevant contrasting sentence; do not claim that this short excerpt alone establishes every current procedural requirement.