The Restaurant That Stayed Closed Longer Than It Had To
Bayside Grill has a commercial property policy with business income coverage: a $50,000 monthly limit, a $600,000 annual aggregate, a 72-hour waiting period, and a period of restoration that ends when the damaged property should be repaired "with reasonable speed." On March 2 a failed supply line floods the dining room and the restaurant closes. The insured's original contractor could have finished in 30 days; the owner instead hired a friend's company, which did not start for 30 days and finished on June 10. Average monthly revenue is $150,000; continuing expenses are rent $12,000, utilities $2,000, and salaried managers $16,000; food and hourly labor (non-continuing) run 40% of revenue. The owner kept paying hourly staff during the closure and later received a $25,000 forgivable government grant.
1. Determine the period of restoration and calculate the covered business income loss. Show your math and explain which dates you reject.
Read the worked answer
Period of restoration. It runs from the date of loss until the date the property should, with reasonable speed, have been repaired - not the date the insured actually reopened. The original contractor's 30-day schedule sets that date (April 1). The 30-day idle period caused by hiring the friend's company is a delay within the insured's control and is not covered; the actual June 10 completion is rejected for that reason. The 72-hour waiting period is then deducted, leaving 27 compensable days.
Monthly business income. Business income = net profit + continuing operating expenses.
- Revenue: $150,000
- Less non-continuing costs (40%): $60,000
- Less continuing expenses ($12,000 + $2,000 + $16,000): $30,000
- Net profit: $60,000
- Plus continuing expenses: $30,000 → $90,000 per month
Apply the limit. The monthly limit of $50,000 binds, so: $50,000 × 27/30 = $45,000.
Reasoning check: the monthly limit is not a suggestion that the loss is $50,000 per month forever - it caps each month's recoverable loss, and unused monthly capacity does not carry into other months or into the annual aggregate.
2. How should the adjuster treat (a) the $25,000 forgivable grant, (b) the continued hourly payroll, and (c) the relationship between the monthly limit and the $600,000 aggregate?
Read the worked answer
(a) The grant. Business income indemnifies actual loss of earnings. A forgivable government grant is generally not "insurance" and most business income forms do not offset it, but the adjuster must read the policy's other-insurance, loss-payment, and recoveries/duplication language before deciding. The wrong moves are silently deducting it without a cited provision, or ignoring it and later facing a subrogation or recovery dispute. Document the provision relied on either way.
(b) The hourly payroll. Hourly labor is non-continuing, so those wages are already excluded from the $90,000 calculation and cannot be claimed again as business income. If the payments were made to retain key staff so the restaurant could reopen faster, the proper home for them is extra expense coverage - and only to the extent they actually reduced the loss. Ask for the payroll registers and the owner's stated purpose.
(c) Limit mechanics. $50,000 is a per-month cap; $600,000 is the aggregate for the policy period. The monthly cap is what binds here because the computed monthly loss ($90,000) exceeds it. If the restoration ran long, the adjuster would total each month's capped loss and test the running total against the aggregate, and would separately check whether an extended period of indemnity or a waiting-period/period-of-restoration endorsement changes either number.
3. What must the adjuster obtain to support the numbers and to defend the 30-day restoration finding if the insured disputes it?
Read the worked answer
Support for the loss amount: signed sworn proof of loss; profit-and-loss statements and tax returns for the prior 12–24 months; POS or sales-tax records showing March–June revenue; payroll registers and rent invoices establishing continuing expenses; and the food-cost percentage supporting the 40% non-continuing figure. Support for the restoration date: both contractors' written proposals with start dates and durations, permits and inspection records, and evidence of the insured's own scheduling decisions (emails, texts, the friend's company's start date).
The adjuster should also document mitigation - drying, temporary power, takeout operations - because income earned during the restoration offsets the loss. Finally, put the 30-day determination in writing to the insured with the reasoning and the policy language quoted, invite the insured to submit competing scheduling evidence, and keep the file open for a supplement. Reasoning: the dispute will be about the end date, not the arithmetic, so the schedule evidence is the heart of the file.