The Late Assignment Policy
A first-year student is writing a one-paragraph argument for an English class about whether late work should be penalized. Her draft claim is: "Late work should not be penalized because students have busy lives." Her instructor marks it as too broad and unsupported. The student has gathered three facts she can use: (1) her own experience of being late once due to a family emergency, (2) a class survey where 12 of 30 students said they had submitted late at least once, and (3) the fact that the syllabus already allows one excused late submission per term. She wants to keep her original opinion but make the paragraph stronger within 150 words.
1. Why is the original claim weak, and how should she narrow it using her available evidence?
Read the worked answer
The claim is weak for two reasons: busy lives is vague and unmeasurable, and should not be penalized is an absolute that her own evidence does not support. Her evidence actually supports a narrower claim: that a limited, excused allowance for late work is fair. The survey (12 of 30 late at least once) shows lateness is common but says nothing about whether it should be penalty-free. The syllabus fact shows the policy already grants one excused submission, which supports a moderate position. A stronger claim: "A limited excused late submission, like the one already in our syllabus, is fairer than a blanket penalty because unexpected emergencies affect many students." This claim is narrower, matches her evidence, and is defensible.
2. Her personal story is one data point. How should she use it without overgeneralizing, and what is the risk if she does not?
Read the worked answer
She should present the personal story as an illustration, not as proof. Phrasing like "for example, I once submitted late because of a family emergency" signals it is one case. The risk of overgeneralizing is a logical fallacy: concluding from a single experience that all students deserve no penalty. A reader can dismiss one anecdote easily, which weakens the whole paragraph. By pairing the anecdote with the survey (showing lateness is common) and the syllabus fact (showing a workable policy exists), she uses the story to make the issue vivid while the other evidence carries the argument. The reasoning is about matching the strength of a claim to the strength of the evidence behind it.