Fifty-Four Percent in One Ticker: Diversifying Without Triggering a $253,000 Tax Bill
Marcus, 52, is a chief technology officer at a publicly traded company. Of $2.6M in liquid net worth, $1.4M is company stock, half vested RSUs and half ESPP shares, with an aggregate basis of $520,000. His 401(k) holds $610,000 in a 2040 target-date fund. A taxable brokerage account holds $390,000 of diversified index funds, and $200,000 sits in cash. He has $310,000 left on a 3.1% mortgage and one child entering college in three years. Marginal rates are 35% federal, 5% state, plus the 3.8% net investment income tax. The stock trades at $141, down from a high of $180 last year. Marcus says he will sell when it gets back to $180, that the company is about to turn around, and that selling now would lock in a loss. He gives $10,000 a year to his church and wants to retire at 60.
1. Analyze the concentration and the get-back-to-$180 plan. Identify the behavioral biases at work and describe how you would respond in the client meeting.
Read the worked answer
Quantify the exposure. 54% of liquid net worth in a single stock, issued by his employer. That is a double bet: his financial capital and his human capital depend on the same company. A further 25% decline removes roughly $350,000 from a $2.6M balance sheet, and a severe drawdown in the stock could coincide with a job loss.
Name the biases without lecturing.
- Anchoring: $180 is a reference point with no economic content. The market has no memory of his purchase price or the high.
- Loss aversion and the disposition effect: he is defining the outcome by the entry price rather than by his total wealth.
- Endowment and familiarity: long tenure and inside knowledge make the risk feel smaller than it is.
Reframe the question. Stop asking what the stock will do and ask: if I handed you $1.4M of new cash today, would you buy this one stock with 54% of it? If the answer is no, the current allocation is not a decision, it is an accumulation.
Replace the price target with a rule. Write a concentration policy into the investment policy statement, for example a maximum of 15% in any single security reached over 24 months. A written, dates-and-quantities selling plan, which may be a company-approved 10b5-1 plan, removes the daily decision and the daily regret. Show him the tax cost against the risk cost so the trade-off is explicit rather than emotional.
Do not promise the stock will fall. Predictions invite him to test you. The case rests on uncompensated idiosyncratic risk, not on a forecast, and on the fact that his retirement date is eight years away, which is not a long horizon for a concentrated position to recover from a bad decade.
2. Design a tax-aware diversification sequence for the $1.4M position, given $520,000 of basis, a charitable intent, and 35% federal, 5% state, and 3.8% NIIT. Show your arithmetic.
Read the worked answer
Establish the tax cost first. The unrealized gain is $880,000. At 20% federal long-term capital gains plus 3.8% net investment income tax plus 5% state, the blended rate is about 28.8%, so a single liquidation costs roughly $253,000 and leaves about $1.15M to reinvest. That number should anchor the conversation, because it is the price of the risk reduction and it is not paid all at once.
Then sequence the sales:
- Highest-basis lots first. The ESPP shares usually carry basis close to current value because the discount was already taxed as ordinary income, so they can be sold at little or no gain. Harvest any lots with a loss immediately.
- Harvest losses in the $390,000 taxable account to offset realized gains, being careful not to trigger wash sales in the same security.
- Spread the remaining low-basis sales across tax years, filling the 20% bracket rather than jumping further, and check the net investment income tax threshold before adding gains late in a year.
- Use a written selling schedule over 18 to 24 months so the decision is mechanical rather than repeated.
Then layer the tax-advantaged exits:
- Charitable gifts of the lowest-basis shares. A $50,000 gift of stock with $18,000 of basis avoids the gain and generates a fair-market-value deduction, and a donor-advised fund lets him bunch several years of the $10,000 annual giving into one year to clear the standard deduction.
- Consider an exchange fund for a slice if he wants immediate diversification without a taxable event, understanding the seven-year lockup, the concentration risk inside the fund, and the carryover basis.
- A collar or prepaid variable forward defines the downside during the wind-down; disclose that it caps upside and has its own tax and disclosure complexity.
- Gifting to the children has limited appeal because the kiddie tax applies the parents' rate to their unearned income above a small threshold.
Check the 401(k) for employer stock. If the plan holds company stock, a lump-sum distribution may allow net unrealized appreciation treatment on the appreciation, which is a separate and often larger opportunity than the taxable account.
3. How should the $2.6M be located across the 401(k), Roth-type accounts, and taxable accounts, and what rebalancing policy would you write into the investment policy statement?
Read the worked answer
Asset location first. The 401(k) currently holds a 2040 target-date fund, which bundles bonds and equities, so location decisions cannot be made until it is unbundled into separate funds. Once it is:
- Put taxable bonds, TIPS, and any high-turnover strategies inside the 401(k), where interest is sheltered.
- Put broad equity index funds and any international fund eligible for the foreign tax credit in the taxable account, where qualified dividends and long-term gains are taxed favorably and where the step-up in basis at death applies.
- Put the highest expected growth assets in the Roth, since qualified distributions are never taxed and there are no required distributions during his lifetime.
- Keep the $200,000 cash trimmed to a real reserve: roughly 12 months of expenses plus the college down payment, with the remainder invested on the written schedule.
Then set the policy. A 70/30 target at age 52 with a glide path toward 60/40 by 60 is defensible given an eight-year horizon. Write in:
- Rebalancing bands of plus or minus 5 percentage points on major asset classes, checked quarterly, with rebalancing done first through new contributions and dividends to avoid taxable sales.
- A single-security concentration limit, phased from 54% to 15% over 24 months.
- A rule that no new RSU vest is ever allowed to accumulate; shares are sold at vest on a preset schedule.
- A statement that the tax cost of diversifying is an expense of risk control, not a reason to defer it.
Revisit the mortgage question. At 3.1% fixed and with the debt tax-favored relative to the portfolio's expected return, paying it off early is not the priority; preserving liquidity during the diversification period matters more.