CAP Tapissier d’ameublement en siège: foundations study materials
CAP Tapissier d’ameublement en siège: foundations study resources

Checking an explicitly specified spring grid

CAP Tapissier d’ameublement en siège: foundations · Put your knowledge to work in context.

All case studies

Checking an explicitly specified spring grid

For a hypothetical planning exercise, a rectangular opening measures 36 cm by 36 cm. Each selected spring occupies an 8 cm diameter envelope, and the exercise requires 2 cm clear space between neighbouring envelopes plus 2 cm at each outer boundary. The trainee draws a 3 by 3 grid and asks whether it fits, then suggests that a 4 by 4 grid might provide more support. These are supplied geometry assumptions for a classroom estimate, not universal trade clearances or authorization to install the springs on a real object. The supervisor asks for a complete width calculation, including both inner gaps and both boundary spaces. No compression fraction, fastener length or actual load rating has been supplied. A real assembly would still need the appropriate design and practical assessment.

1. Do 3 across fit under these assumptions?

Read the worked answer

Yes:3×8+2×2+2×2=32cm,within 36 cm. The same calculation applies to the depth of this rectangular example.

2. Does4across fit?

Read the worked answer

No:4×8+3×2+2×2=42cm,which exceeds 36 cm. More springs cannot be assumed possible simply because a smaller grid fits.