FSCP study materials
FSCP study resources

Independent Producer Building a 90-Day Pipeline Under a Non-Solicit

FSCP · Put your knowledge to work in context.

All case studies

Independent Producer Building a 90-Day Pipeline Under a Non-Solicit

Devin is a three-year captive life and annuity producer moving to an independent practice. The captive contract bars soliciting or contacting any former client for 12 months, so Devin starts with no book. Household income need is $120,000 in year one; average first-year commission is $3,500 per case. Devin historically closes one in four appointments, and each appointment requires about five live contacts. The 90-day plan: buy a 2,000-name list of small-business owners, cold-call from a personal cell phone, offer a $50 gift card for a 15-minute 'no-obligation review,' post daily on LinkedIn, ask every client for a Google review, sponsor a youth soccer team for $2,500, and host a 'Medicare 101' dinner at a restaurant with a free meal. Devin also wants to pay former colleagues $100 for each referral that becomes an appointment and to use two client thank-you notes as testimonials on the website. Marketing budget is $12,000 for the quarter.

1. Test whether the 90-day plan can plausibly replace $120,000 of income, and identify the binding constraint.

Read the worked answer

Run the required production backward from the income need.

  • $120,000 / $3,500 = 34.3, so about 35 cases.
  • At a 25% close rate, 35 / 0.25 = 140 appointments.
  • At five live contacts per appointment, 700 contacts.
  • Over 46 working weeks, that is about 3 appointments per week and 15 contacts per week.
  • In 90 days (13 weeks), the plan can produce about 39 appointments and, at 25%, about 10 cases, or $35,000. That is roughly 29% of the annual need.

The plan is not necessarily wrong, but it is a ramp, not income replacement. The binding constraint is trust and conversion, not list size. A cold list of 2,000 small-business owners might yield 20% live contact (400 conversations) and 10% appointments (40), which matches the 90-day estimate. The $50 gift card may raise response but attracts price-sensitive prospects and adds compliance risk. At 40 appointments, gift cards cost $2,000; with list cost and the $12,000 budget, cost per appointment is roughly $350-$400, acceptable only if case size holds.

Judgement: keep a smaller cold-calling test, but shift at least half the budget and most of the calendar to centers of influence (CPAs, property-casualty agents, group benefits brokers) and systematic referral requests, because those produce higher close rates and larger cases. The 90-day goal should be pipeline, not $120,000.

2. Which elements of the plan create compliance risk, and what should Devin do instead?

Read the worked answer

Several tactics need review before launch:

  • Cold calls to cell phones: manually dialed calls are generally lower risk than autodialed or prerecorded calls, but telemarketing calls still require national and state Do Not Call scrubbing, an internal DNC list, and caller identification. Autodialed or prerecorded calls to cell phones require prior express written consent under the TCPA. State rules can be stricter.
  • $50 gift card: an incentive conditioned on listening to a sales presentation can be treated as an unlawful inducement or rebate under state insurance law, and Medicare marketing rules prohibit incentives to enroll. It should not be conditioned on a purchase, and compliance should approve the wording.
  • $100 referral fees to former colleagues: unlicensed persons cannot share commissions or receive transaction-based compensation. Even among licensed colleagues, fee-sharing requires a written agreement and disclosure. Paying former colleagues could also induce them to breach Devin's non-solicit.
  • Testimonials: use requires permission, cannot be misleading, and may need disclosure that it is a solicited testimonial. Thank-you notes should not imply a guarantee.
  • Medicare 101 dinner: CMS marketing rules restrict meals and require a genuinely educational event with no sales presentation or scope-of-appointment collection for Medicare Advantage or Part D. State advertising filing rules may also apply.
  • LinkedIn posts: treat them as advertising, keep records, avoid unsubstantiated claims, and route securities-related content through the broker-dealer's review.

The safe path is to drop the gift card and referral fee, use a compliant educational seminar without a free meal if Medicare is discussed, and build a written referral process with licensed professionals.

3. Design a 90-day measurement scorecard and explain how Devin should use it to adjust the plan.

Read the worked answer

Measure leading activity weekly and outcomes monthly. Leading indicators: dials, live conversations, appointments set, appointments held, fact-finders completed, proposals delivered, referral requests made, referral names received, and center-of-influence meetings. Lagging indicators: cases closed, average case size, commission, cost per appointment, cost per case, days from first contact to close, and source of business.

A workable 90-day target: 15 live contacts and 3 held appointments per week; 1 fact-finder per week; 2 referral asks per held appointment; 2 center-of-influence meetings per week; 1 case per week by week 10. Track source separately so cold-list, seminar, LinkedIn, and referral economics are visible.

Use a 30-day gate. If cold-list conversations convert to appointments below 8%, cut the list budget and move it to referral and COI work. If appointments are set but not held, fix confirmation and scheduling. If fact-finders are completed but proposals are not closing, the issue is case design or presentation, not prospecting. Review the scorecard every Friday, not quarterly, because a 90-day plan has only 13 weeks to correct. The purpose is to distinguish an activity problem from a conversion problem before the marketing budget is spent.