Revision Priorities in a Persuasive Draft
A candidate drafts a 470-word persuasive essay arguing that the local school board should shift start times one hour later. The introduction says, 'This is a big issue that matters for many reasons.' The body has one personal anecdote about a sleepy student, a statistic without a source, and a paragraph listing three unrelated benefits. The conclusion repeats the introduction. There are also six comma splices and two misspelled words. The rubric weights development 40%, organization 30%, conventions 20%, and language 10%. The candidate has 25 minutes to revise before submitting.
1. Given the rubric weights and the draft's weaknesses, which revision should the candidate make first? Justify your choice with specific references to the draft.
Read the worked answer
Development first. It is 40% of the score and the draft's weakest area: the thesis is vague, the evidence is thin (one anecdote and an unsourced statistic), and the body lists unrelated benefits rather than building a line of reasoning. A 25-minute revision should not major in 20%-weighted comma splices while the 40% category remains underdeveloped. The candidate should replace the vague introduction with a precise claim, add at least one credible source or concrete example, and connect each benefit to the claim.
2. The candidate is tempted to spend 15 minutes fixing comma splices and spelling. Explain why that is a poor time-allocation decision, using the rubric.
Read the worked answer
Conventions are 20%, and the errors are surface-level. Even a perfect fix cannot raise the score as much as improving development (40%) or organization (30%). With only 25 minutes, the opportunity cost is high: 15 minutes on conventions leaves 10 minutes for the higher-weighted categories. Better to reserve a brief final proofread for the most visible errors and spend most time on thesis, evidence, and paragraph order.
3. Write a revised thesis statement that is specific, arguable, and appropriate for the school board audience.
Read the worked answer
Example: 'The school board should move high school start times from 7:30 to 8:30 a.m. because later starts are linked to safer teen driving and better first-period attendance, and the district can offset busing costs by staggering elementary routes.' This is specific (time change and mechanisms), arguable (a board could disagree), and audience-appropriate (addresses cost concern). It also sets up body paragraphs on safety, attendance, and budget.