The $100,000 Bond Beyond the Power
An agent writes a $100,000 appearance bond for a defendant charged with aggravated assault. The surety's power of attorney attached to the bond limits the agent to $50,000 per single bond unless the surety gives special written authorization. The agent signs the surety's name without obtaining that authorization. The bond form identifies the court only as "Superior Court," omits the defendant's address and the date of the offense, and does not attach a copy of the agent's license. The jail accepts the bond and releases the defendant. The indemnity agreement is signed by the defendant's father, but the blank for the indemnity amount was never filled in. The agency file contains no copy of the bond, no receipt, and no power of attorney. The defendant fails to appear, and the surety denies coverage, saying the agent exceeded his authority.
1. Is the bond enforceable against the surety? Analyze the power-of-attorney limit and the form defects.
Read the worked answer
The power of attorney defines the agent's authority, and the surety is generally bound only within that authority. Writing a $100,000 bond under a $50,000 limit without special written authorization is an excess-authority act. That does not automatically make the bond void as to the court or the defendant, because the bond was accepted and the defendant was released; courts often focus on whether the bond substantially complied and whether the surety held out the agent as authorized. But as between the agent and the surety, the surety has a strong argument that it did not authorize the risk and may deny coverage or seek indemnity from the agent.
The form defects matter but are usually curable rather than fatal. Omitting the defendant's address and offense date, identifying only "Superior Court" without a division, and failing to attach the license create ambiguity and notice problems. The court may allow correction, especially where the jail accepted the bond and the defendant was released. The missing power of attorney in the agency file is a recordkeeping failure and makes it harder for the agent to prove authority. The excess amount is the central problem; the clerical omissions are secondary but compound the surety's denial.
2. What is the agent's personal exposure, and what should the agent and agency do now that the defendant has failed to appear?
Read the worked answer
The agent faces exposure on several fronts.
Contractual and indemnity exposure. If the surety pays the forfeiture, it may look to the agent for the amount beyond his authority. The agent signed without special authorization and cannot point to a complete file, so his position is weak.
Regulatory exposure. Writing a bond above the power limit, failing to attach the license, and keeping no bond copy or receipt are licensing and recordkeeping violations. The Department can discipline the agent and the agency.
Practical steps. The agent should immediately notify the surety in writing, provide the bond, the power of attorney, the jail release information, and the indemnity agreement, and cooperate in locating the defendant. He should not alter the form, backfill the power, or destroy the incomplete file. The agency should reconstruct the file from the court and jail, obtain a certified copy of the bond, and prepare a written explanation of the authority issue. If the surety denies coverage, the agent should consult counsel about indemnity and about whether the surety ratified the bond by accepting the premium or by its conduct. The agent should also correct his power-of-attorney procedures before writing another bond.
3. Is the father's indemnity agreement enforceable, and what recordkeeping failures make the file worse?
Read the worked answer
The indemnity agreement is vulnerable because the amount was left blank. An indemnity agreement does not need to be a work of art, but it must identify the obligation and the scope of what the indemnitor is guaranteeing. A blank amount creates a dispute over whether the father agreed to indemnify the full $100,000 bond, only the $50,000 authorized amount, or some other figure. The surety or agent may argue that the agreement incorporates the bond by reference, but the missing figure gives the father a strong argument that the essential term was never agreed. Consideration and signature also matter; a signed but incomplete form is not automatically enforceable.
The recordkeeping failures make the entire file worse. The agency should have retained a copy of the bond, the power of attorney, the premium receipt, the indemnity agreement, and the defendant's contact and reporting information. Without those records, the agency cannot prove what was executed, what was collected, or what the father agreed to. That undermines the forfeiture response and the indemnity claim at the same time.
The corrective steps are to complete the indemnity only with the father's informed signature, not by filling in a blank after the fact; obtain special written authority for any bond above the limit; use a complete bond form; attach the license and power; and maintain a file for every bond for the required retention period.