Impaired Dentist and CE Attestation
Dr. Brooks, 58, has owned a solo practice for 25 years. Over the past two months, the front desk has noticed alcohol odor on his breath in the morning, late arrivals, and unexplained cancellations. Last week, he wrote a hydrocodone prescription for himself after a 'back flare-up' and asked a hygienist to sign the office's prescription log as the prescriber. His license renewal is due in three weeks. He has completed 12 of the 40 continuing-education hours required for the biennium. He asks the office manager to sign his CE attestation and says the Board 'never checks.' A new associate, Dr. Lewis, notices the alcohol odor and hears Dr. Brooks slurring instructions to a patient. Dr. Lewis asks what she must do.
1. What should Dr. Lewis do about Dr. Brooks's apparent impairment and self-prescribing?
Read the worked answer
Issue: Whether a colleague must report suspected impairment and self-prescribing.
Reasoning: Patient safety comes first. A dentist who is impaired cannot safely practice, and self-prescribing a controlled substance without a legitimate treating relationship and documentation is outside accepted practice. Georgia's impairment and mandatory-reporting framework requires licensees who have reasonable cause to believe another licensee is practicing while impaired to report to the Board, and the report should be factual rather than speculative.
Application: Dr. Lewis should not ignore the slurred speech and alcohol odor. She should take immediate steps to prevent patient harm, such as interrupting care and arranging coverage. She should document what she observed, date and time, and any patient safety concerns. She should report to the Board through its complaint process and encourage Dr. Brooks to contact the professional health program. She should not sign or alter any prescription log entry.
Conclusion: Report the observed impairment and self-prescribing. Do not cover it up or let him continue treating patients while impaired.
2. Can Dr. Brooks renew his license with 12 CE hours and a signed attestation?
Read the worked answer
Issue: Whether the CE attestation can be signed before the biennial requirement is complete.
Reasoning: Georgia requires dentists to complete the required continuing education for the renewal cycle and to attest truthfully. Signing a false attestation is unprofessional conduct and can lead to discipline, including license suspension or revocation. The Board audits CE records, and 'the Board never checks' is not a defense.
Application: Dr. Brooks has only 12 of the required 40 hours. He cannot truthfully attest that he completed the requirement. He must complete the remaining hours before renewal or seek guidance from the Board if a documented hardship or extension applies. The office manager should not sign on his behalf. If he submits a false attestation, both the false statement and the underlying impairment issues may be investigated.
Conclusion: Do not sign the attestation. Complete the CE requirement or contact the Board about lawful options.
3. What should the practice do about the prescription log and the self-prescribed hydrocodone?
Read the worked answer
Reasoning: A prescription log must reflect the actual prescriber. Asking a hygienist to sign as prescriber is false documentation and may violate controlled-substance recordkeeping rules. Self-prescribing a controlled substance is especially risky because it bypasses an independent clinical assessment and creates diversion and impairment concerns.
Application: Do not alter the log to hide the entry. Preserve the original record. The practice should report the false log entry through the same Board process and cooperate with any investigation. Dr. Brooks should not write further controlled-substance prescriptions for himself or others while impaired. A treating provider should assess his back problem independently.
Conclusion: Preserve the record, report the false entry, and stop self-prescribing. The priority is patient safety and accurate controlled-substance documentation.