GA MPJE study materials
GA MPJE study resources

The Expired-Window CII and the Partial Fill Request

GA MPJE · Put your knowledge to work in context.

All case studies

The Expired-Window CII and the Partial Fill Request

A 58-year-old patient presents a paper prescription for oxycodone 15 mg tablets, #60, written by a Georgia-licensed physician on March 2. The patient presents on March 28. The prescription bears no 'earliest fill date' notation but does state 'may fill remainder later.' The patient says the pharmacy only had 20 tablets on March 5 and dispensed those, but the pharmacy's own records show no prior dispensing - the patient actually got the 20 tablets at a different chain pharmacy. The patient wants the remaining 40 filled here now. The pharmacist verifies the prescriber and the diagnosis (post-surgical pain) by phone. The pharmacy's controlled substance inventory reconciliation is due this week, and the pharmacist is also the pharmacist-in-charge.

1. Can this pharmacy legally dispense any quantity against this prescription today? Analyze the federal partial-fill rules and Georgia's schedule II prescription validity window, and identify the single fact that controls the outcome.

Read the worked answer

Two independent limits must both be satisfied.

Federal (21 CFR 1306.13): A partial fill of a schedule II prescription is permitted, but the remaining portions must be dispensed within 72 hours of the original partial fill; if not, the pharmacist must notify the DEA. The 72-hour clock runs from the first partial dispensing, which occurred March 5 at the other pharmacy. March 28 is far outside 72 hours. The 'may fill remainder later' notation does not create an open-ended right to complete a CII.

Georgia: Schedule II prescriptions must be filled within 30 days of the date written (Ga. Comp. R. & Regs. 480-11; O.C.G.A. § 16-13-41 et seq. framework). March 2 to March 28 is 26 days, so the state window is not yet blown - but that does not help, because the federal 72-hour partial-fill rule already forecloses completing the balance.

Controlling fact: the date and location of the first partial fill (March 5, other pharmacy). Because the balance was not supplied within 72 hours, this prescription cannot be completed as a partial fill. The pharmacist should not dispense the 40 tablets against this document. If the patient still needs medication, the prescriber must issue a new prescription (subject to the 30-day state window and all CII requirements), and the pharmacist should document the refusal and the reason.

2. The pharmacist wants to 'make it right' by dispensing 40 tablets and documenting it as a partial fill completed today. What recordkeeping and licensure exposure does that create, and what should the pharmacist do instead?

Read the worked answer

Dispensing the balance and back-dating or mislabeling it as a timely partial fill would be a falsified record. Exposure includes:

  • Federal: dispensing a CII beyond the 72-hour partial-fill limit without the required DEA notification; inaccurate records of receipt/dispensing under 21 CFR 1304 and 1306; potential loss of DEA registration and civil penalties.
  • Georgia: Board discipline for unprofessional conduct and recordkeeping violations (O.C.G.A. § 26-4-60 et seq.; Board Rule 480-11-.02 on prescription records), plus possible GDNA/GBP investigation. As PIC, the pharmacist also bears responsibility for the inventory reconciliation.
  • Inventory: the 20 tablets dispensed elsewhere never entered this pharmacy's perpetual inventory; adding a 40-tablet dispensing would create an unexplained discrepancy during the reconciliation due this week - a red flag in any audit.

Correct course: decline to fill against the old document; explain to the patient; contact the prescriber for a new, properly dated prescription if clinically indicated; enter a note in the patient record; and ensure the reconciliation reflects only drugs actually received and dispensed here. Do not alter the original prescription or create a compensating record.