Applicant With an Undisclosed 2019 DUI and a Pending Job Offer
An applicant submits a Georgia optometry license application in March. She graduated from an accredited school in 2022, passed NBEO Parts I, II, and III, and completed the Georgia jurisprudence examination. The application asks: 'Have you ever been arrested, charged, or convicted of any offense other than a minor traffic violation?' She answers 'No.' A routine fingerprint background check reveals a 2019 misdemeanor DUI, first offense, with completion of a diversion program and expungement under state law. She also discloses on the application that she was placed on academic probation for a professionalism violation in optometry school, but attaches a letter explaining it. The Board investigator requests an interview. The applicant asks whether she should simply withdraw the application and reapply next year, or attend the interview with counsel. She has a signed job offer in Savannah starting in 60 days.
1. Identify the licensure issues and explain whether the 2019 DUI, standing alone, is likely to disqualify her. What difference does expungement make?
Read the worked answer
The central issue is not simply the DUI; it is candor and materiality. Georgia licensure is a privilege conditioned on good moral character and fitness, and the Board may investigate arrests, charges, convictions, and school discipline that bear on fitness to practice. A single first-offense misdemeanor DUI from 2019, followed by diversion and no subsequent misconduct, is unlikely by itself to compel denial. The Board will weigh age of the offense, rehabilitation, compliance with diversion, treatment if any, references, and the professionalism issue.
Expungement matters but is not a magic eraser. It may limit public dissemination of the record, and the exact expunction order and application wording matter. If the application asks about arrests or charges and not merely convictions, answering 'No' may still be a material misrepresentation. The nondisclosure is potentially more serious than the DUI because it goes to honesty in the licensure process. She should not assume withdrawal solves the problem: reapplication will likely ask the same questions, and withdrawal during an investigation can look like evasion. She should attend with counsel, correct the record in writing, and provide certified dispositions and rehabilitation evidence.
2. How should she respond to the Board interview and what due process rights attach if the Board proposes denial?
Read the worked answer
At the interview she should be accurate, concise, and consistent. She should bring certified court records, proof of diversion completion, expunction papers, the school's disciplinary file, a personal statement, and letters showing rehabilitation and present fitness. She should not minimize the DUI or blame the background check. If she previously misunderstood the question, she should say so plainly, correct the answer, and explain why the omission was not intentional.
If the Board proposes denial, Georgia administrative procedure supplies a contested-case path: notice of the proposed action, an opportunity to respond, and, if material facts are disputed, a hearing before an administrative law judge or the Board as provided by law and Board rules. She may be represented by counsel, present evidence and witnesses, cross-examine, and seek review of an adverse final decision. The applicant generally bears the burden of showing she meets licensure requirements. Settlement or a consent agreement may be possible, but she should not agree to conditions without understanding their effect on future applications and practice.
3. What should she be told about the Savannah job offer and any work before licensure?
Read the worked answer
She cannot practice optometry or hold herself out as a licensed optometrist until Georgia issues the license, unless the Board has issued a specific temporary or graduate permit and she complies with its limits. A signed employment contract does not create practice authority. Before licensure she may perform only tasks that may lawfully be delegated to an unlicensed assistant, under the required supervision, and she may not examine patients, diagnose, treat, prescribe, fit contact lenses, or sign optometric records as an optometrist.
The practical advice is to notify the employer immediately, ask whether the start date can be adjusted, and define pre-licensure duties in writing. If the Board interview creates delay, she should request a prompt decision and consider whether a temporary permit is available. Working outside scope to protect the job would create independent disciplinary exposure and could jeopardize the license she is seeking.