Referral Fees, 'Board-Certified' Advertising, and Technician Tasks
An optometrist opens a new practice next to an optical boutique. The boutique's owner agrees to pay the optometrist $60 for each patient referred for a contact lens examination, and the optometrist agrees to pay the boutique $25 for each pair of glasses the optometrist's patients buy there. The optometrist's advertisement says: 'Board-certified eye doctor-free comprehensive exam-$99 value' and 'same-day contact lens fitting by certified technicians.' An unlicensed technician performs non-contact tonometry, autorefraction, and teaches a new patient how to insert and remove lenses; the optometrist signs off on the final contact lens prescription after a 5-minute check. The optometrist has no specialty board certification.
1. Identify the advertising and fee-splitting problems.
Read the worked answer
The referral arrangement is the clearest problem. Paying or receiving money for patient referrals, and paying the boutique for glasses purchased by the optometrist's patients, looks like fee splitting or prohibited remuneration rather than a legitimate rent or service arrangement. Georgia restricts fee splitting and solicitation, and the Board will examine whether payments are for actual goods or services at fair market value or are disguised inducements. The optometrist should stop the arrangement and have counsel review any lease or business agreement.
The advertising is also risky. 'Board-certified eye doctor' is false if the optometrist holds no recognized specialty board certification; state licensure is not board certification. 'Free comprehensive exam-$99 value' can be misleading if conditions, upgrade fees, or mandatory purchases are not disclosed. 'Certified technicians' must be accurate. Advertising must be truthful and not deceptive, and the Board may treat misleading claims as unprofessional conduct. The optometrist should correct the website, signage, and scripts immediately.
2. Evaluate the delegation to the unlicensed technician.
Read the worked answer
Delegation depends on the task, the technician's training, and the optometrist's supervision. Non-contact tonometry and autorefraction may be delegated as data-gathering tasks under Board rules and office protocols, but the optometrist remains responsible for interpreting results and ensuring calibration and competency. Teaching insertion and removal of contact lenses can often be delegated to a trained assistant, but the fitting, evaluation of fit, diagnosis of contact-lens-related complications, and final prescription are optometric services.
A 5-minute check may be inadequate if the technician essentially performed the fitting and the optometrist did not personally evaluate the cornea, lens fit, vision, and patient understanding. The record should show what the technician did, what the optometrist independently verified, and what was taught. The optometrist should not use unlicensed staff to evade supervision limits or to perform tasks reserved to licensed optometrists.
3. What corrective steps should the optometrist take before a Board investigation?
Read the worked answer
The optometrist should immediately stop the referral payments, correct or remove the advertising claims, and revise the contact-lens protocol so the licensed optometrist personally performs the essential evaluation and prescription. Staff should be retrained on scope, documentation, and escalation. The office should audit recent contact-lens records for inadequate supervision and recent advertisements for other unsupported claims.
If a Board inquiry is likely, the optometrist should consult counsel before making statements, preserve records, and consider a written self-report with a remediation plan. Corrective steps may include refunding improper payments, revising business agreements, adding written delegation policies, and documenting additional training. The Board has disciplinary authority over unprofessional conduct, fee splitting, and misleading advertising, so early correction and candor are more persuasive than waiting for a complaint to force changes.