The Falling Water Table
A farming town draws irrigation water from wells drilled into a sandstone aquifer. A nearby creek is fed partly by groundwater. Records from the town's monitoring well show the depth from land surface to the water table was 12 m in 2015, 15 m in 2018, 18 m in 2021, and 19 m in 2023. The creek's late-summer flow has shrunk each year and now stops entirely in dry Augusts. Regional weather records show annual precipitation near normal throughout the period, with no multi-year drought. Meanwhile, irrigated acreage and total pumping rose from about 40 million liters per year in 2015 to about 95 million liters per year in 2023.
1. The town council calls the falling water table "just part of a dry cycle." Use the evidence to evaluate that claim.
Read the worked answer
The dry-cycle explanation does not fit the evidence.
- Precipitation was near normal for the whole period, with no multi-year drought. Less rain is the mechanism a "dry cycle" would require, and it is absent.
- The decline is steady and large: about 7 m over 8 years, continuing past a single bad year.
- Pumping more than doubled over the same period, from 40 to 95 million liters per year - a change in the opposite direction from rainfall.
- The creek's baseflow is shrinking, which is exactly what happens when the water table drops below the level that normally feeds the stream.
The most consistent explanation is that extraction exceeds recharge: water is being removed from storage faster than rainfall can refill it. A correlation between pumping and decline is not proof by itself, but the absence of any rainfall decline removes the main competing explanation.
2. Describe one observation, beyond the well-depth numbers, that would strengthen the case that pumping is the cause.
Read the worked answer
Several options work; the strongest is one that links the timing or location of pumping to water levels.
- Seasonal pattern: if the water level drops sharply during the irrigation season and partly recovers each winter when pumping stops, that is strong evidence pumps drive the decline. A climate-driven drop would not recover on a pumping schedule.
- Spatial pattern: if water levels fall fastest in wells close to heavily pumped fields and barely change in a distant well tapping the same aquifer, the effect is local, as pumping would produce, not regional, as drought would.
- Rapid response to storms: a water level that does not rebound after a very wet month suggests recharge is limited or being drawn down quickly.
Any of these tests the causal link rather than merely restating the correlation.
3. Predict two consequences if pumping continues at the 2023 rate, and explain each.
Read the worked answer
1. The creek will lose flow for more of the year, and for longer stretches. A stream fed by groundwater persists in dry months only while the water table sits above the streambed. A falling water table reverses the flow - the stream begins losing water into the aquifer instead of gaining it. Late-summer flow disappearing is the first stage of this; permanent loss of baseflow is the next.
2. Other water users will have to go deeper or lose supply. Shallow domestic and stock wells will run dry first, and replacement wells must be drilled deeper at greater cost. The aquifer's stored volume is finite, so continuing to remove 95 million liters a year without matching recharge means the decline continues until extraction is cut, recharge increases, or the water becomes unusable. Compacted aquifer layers may also subside, permanently reducing storage capacity.