Double-cab pickup: classification and refund after PCA
On 12 March 2025, a licensed agent lodges an ICUMS declaration for a used 2019 Toyota Hilux double-cab pickup imported by a construction company. The invoice shows CIF Tema of GHS 300,000. The agent enters HS 8703.24 and pays duty at 20%, VAT at 15%, NHIL at 2.5%, GETFund at 2.5%, COVID-19 levy at 1% and ECOWAS levy at 0.5%. Physical examination records a separate cargo bed, gross vehicle weight of 3,000 kg, rear leaf suspension and a factory-fitted cargo tie-down system. The company uses the vehicle to carry cement and tools. Six months later, Post Clearance Audit reviews the file and concludes that the vehicle is a goods vehicle under HS 8704, for which the applicable duty rate is 5%. The company has already sold the vehicle and now files a refund claim for the duty difference. The audit also notes that the declaration was lodged by the agent using the company’s imprimatur.
1. Determine the correct HS heading and explain the classification reasoning. Does the presence of rear seats change your answer?
Read the worked answer
Classification. The correct heading is 8704, not 8703. GRI 1 requires classification by the terms of the headings and any relative Section or Chapter Notes. Heading 8703 covers motor cars and other motor vehicles principally designed for the transport of persons; heading 8704 covers motor vehicles for the transport of goods. The examination facts point to 8704: a separate cargo bed, gross vehicle weight of 3,000 kg, rear leaf suspension and factory cargo tie-downs, plus use for cement and tools. A double cab with rear seats is not automatically a passenger vehicle; many crew-cab goods vehicles have rear seats. HS Explanatory Notes to 8704 include goods vehicles with a separate cab and load compartment. The rear seats only matter if the vehicle is principally designed and equipped for passenger transport. On these facts it is not. The agent's entry under 8703.24 was therefore wrong.
2. Calculate the customs duty difference and explain whether the company is entitled to a refund of all taxes and levies shown in the declaration.
Read the worked answer
Duty effect. Duty at 20% on CIF GHS 300,000 = GHS 60,000. Correct duty at 5% = GHS 15,000. Difference = GHS 45,000. The other charges also change because they are computed on CIF plus duty: at 20% duty the base is GHS 360,000, giving VAT 15% = GHS 54,000, NHIL 2.5% = GHS 9,000, GETFund 2.5% = GHS 9,000 and COVID-19 levy 1% = GHS 3,600. At 5% duty the base is GHS 315,000, giving VAT GHS 47,250, NHIL GHS 7,875, GETFund GHS 7,875 and COVID-19 levy GHS 3,150. The ECOWAS levy at 0.5% of CIF (GHS 1,500) is unchanged. Total overpayment is therefore GHS 54,450, not merely GHS 45,000. The company can claim the overpaid duty and the consequential overpaid import VAT/levies, subject to the refund rules in Act 891 and verification that the taxes were not passed on to another person.
3. What procedural steps and evidence should the company and agent follow to regularise the declaration and recover the overpayment? What risk arises from the agent’s use of the company’s imprimatur?
Read the worked answer
Procedure and risk. The company should not simply rely on the PCA oral finding. It should lodge a written refund/application for review with the Customs Division, attach the PCA report, the amended declaration, commercial invoice, bill of lading, examination report, payment receipts, bank details and a board/authorised signatory resolution. If the entry is still capable of amendment in ICUMS, the agent should follow the amendment workflow; otherwise the refund route applies. The importer must co-operate and preserve the vehicle records. Because the declaration was lodged using the company's imprimatur, the company remains liable for the accuracy of the declaration; the agent may face professional sanctions, but that does not transfer the refund to the agent. If Customs refuses, the company should use the statutory appeal/review mechanism within the stated time limit. The fact that the vehicle has been sold does not destroy the refund claim, but it may affect verification and any penalty decision.