I85PREP
⌘ K
GSL Interpretation of Deeds & Statutes study materials
GSL Interpretation of Deeds & Statutes study resources

GSL Interpretation of Deeds & Statutes practice questions

One question at a time. Build your GSL Interpretation of Deeds & Statutes understanding.

First 50 of 200 questions. Each one lists the choices, the correct answer, and an explanation. The checker at the top of this page saves progress in this browser when it is available.

Continue in the practice tool above to load more questions, 50 at a time.

Question 1Principles of Statutory Interpretation

In statutory interpretation, which term describes the plain, ordinary meaning of the words used in a provision, considered in their grammatical and everyday sense?

  1. The golden rule
  2. The mischief rule
  3. The purposive approach
  4. The literal rule Correct answer.

Explanation

The literal rule requires courts to give words their ordinary dictionary meaning, even where the result seems harsh, because the court's task is to apply what Parliament enacted rather than to improve it. The other approaches are distinct techniques that modify or depart from the plain meaning in defined circumstances.

Question 2Principles of Statutory Interpretation

A court applying the golden rule to a statutory provision that, read literally, would produce an absurd or repugnant result will ordinarily do which of the following?

  1. Refer the provision back to the legislature for amendment
  2. Declare the provision unconstitutional and strike it down
  3. Modify the literal meaning only to the extent needed to avoid the absurdity Correct answer.
  4. Apply the literal meaning regardless of the absurdity

Explanation

The golden rule permits a court to depart from the literal meaning only so far as necessary to avoid absurdity, inconsistency, or a result repugnant to the statute's apparent intent. It is a narrow corrective device, not a licence to rewrite the provision wholesale.

Question 3Principles of Statutory Interpretation

Which approach to statutory construction asks what problem or defect existed in the law before the statute was enacted and reads the provision so as to suppress that defect?

  1. The ejusdem generis rule
  2. The presumption against retrospectivity
  3. The expressio unius rule
  4. The mischief rule Correct answer.

Explanation

The mischief rule, associated with Heydon's Case, directs the interpreter to identify the defect the statute was designed to cure and to construe the words so as to remedy it. It is a purpose-based technique that looks beyond the bare text to the legislative objective.

Question 4Principles of Statutory Interpretation

Which presumption of statutory interpretation concerns the temporal reach of legislation and generally disfavours applying a new enactment to events that occurred before it came into force?

  1. The presumption that statutes do not bind the Crown
  2. The presumption against retrospectivity Correct answer.
  3. The presumption of constitutionality
  4. The presumption against ousting the jurisdiction of the courts

Explanation

The presumption against retrospectivity holds that statutes are presumed not to apply to conduct or transactions completed before their commencement, because fairness requires notice of legal consequences. It is a canon of temporal application rather than one about validity, Crown immunity, or judicial review.

Question 5Principles of Statutory Interpretation

Which maxim provides that where a statute lists specific items followed by a general catch-all term, the general term is confined to items of the same class as those listed?

  1. Noscitur a sociis
  2. Reddendo singula singulis
  3. Expressio unius est exclusio alterius
  4. Ejusdem generis Correct answer.

Explanation

Ejusdem generis limits a broad residual phrase to things of the same kind as the enumerated specifics, preventing the general words from swallowing unrelated categories. Noscitur a sociis is a related but distinct canon that reads a word in light of its immediate context generally.

Question 6Principles of Statutory Interpretation

A statute refers to 'vehicles, whether motorised or not, including bicycles, carts and other conveyances'. A court must decide whether a child's push-scooter falls within 'other conveyances'. Which canon most directly guides the analysis?

  1. The golden rule
  2. Ejusdem generis Correct answer.
  3. The presumption against retrospectivity
  4. The presumption that penal provisions are strictly construed

Explanation

Because a general phrase ('other conveyances') follows a list of specific items (bicycles, carts, and the class of vehicles), ejusdem generis directs that the general phrase be limited to things of the same kind as those enumerated. That is precisely the interpretive question the court faces.

Question 7Principles of Statutory Interpretation

In construing a provision that reads 'no person shall sell, offer for sale, or otherwise dispose of adulterated food', a court treating 'otherwise dispose of' as limited by the preceding verbs is applying which canon?

  1. The presumption against retrospectivity
  2. Noscitur a sociis Correct answer.
  3. Expressio unius est exclusio alterius
  4. The mischief rule

Explanation

Noscitur a sociis takes its meaning from the company a word keeps, so a wide phrase is read in light of the surrounding words with which it is associated. Here 'otherwise dispose of' is coloured by the commercial-sale context of the preceding verbs.

Question 8Principles of Statutory Interpretation

A statute provides that 'the Minister may make regulations with respect to fees, charges, levies and other matters'. Applying ejusdem generis, which reading is most defensible?

  1. 'Other matters' covers any subject whatsoever within the Minister's portfolio
  2. 'Other matters' is limited to matters expressly listed elsewhere in the Act
  3. 'Other matters' is confined to matters of a financial or exactionary character akin to fees, charges and levies Correct answer.
  4. 'Other matters' is void for uncertainty and must be disregarded

Explanation

The general words follow a list of money-related items, so ejusdem generis confines them to matters of the same genus, namely financial impositions. The canon exists precisely to prevent such a catch-all from becoming an unlimited delegation of power.

Question 9Principles of Statutory Interpretation

Where a statute expressly confers one power on a regulator and is silent as to a closely related power, a court invoking expressio unius est exclusio alterius would conclude that the related power is:

  1. Excluded because the express grant suggests the omission was deliberate Correct answer.
  2. Available only with the Minister's written approval
  3. Delegated to the courts to determine case by case
  4. Implied because the statute is silent on it

Explanation

Expressio unius est exclusio alterius treats express mention of one thing as impliedly excluding others, on the reasoning that the drafter addressed the matter and left the remainder out deliberately. The canon is applied cautiously, especially where the statute is not exhaustive.

Question 10Principles of Statutory Interpretation

Which statement best captures the modern purposive approach to statutory interpretation?

  1. The court may disregard the statutory text entirely where it disagrees with the policy
  2. The court must always prefer the interpretation most favourable to the individual over the state
  3. The court construes the text in light of the statute's purpose and may adopt a strained reading where necessary to promote that purpose Correct answer.
  4. The court must apply the dictionary meaning of the words even where that defeats the obvious legislative objective

Explanation

The purposive approach reads the provision as a whole and in light of the objective the legislature sought to achieve, allowing a strained construction where a literal reading would defeat that objective. It remains anchored in the statutory text rather than displacing it.

Question 11Principles of Statutory Interpretation

A statute uses a defined term in its interpretation section. When construing that term elsewhere in the Act, a court should ordinarily:

  1. Apply the ordinary meaning, ignoring the definition section
  2. Apply the statutory definition, since it governs the term throughout the Act Correct answer.
  3. Apply the definition only to the section where it first appears
  4. Apply the definition only if the term is ambiguous

Explanation

A definition in the interpretation provision supplies the meaning of the term for the whole Act unless a contrary intention appears. The statutory definition displaces the ordinary meaning because the legislature has stipulated what the word means.

Question 12Principles of Statutory Interpretation

A provision is headed 'Powers of entry' and its operative words are ambiguous. What weight does a court ordinarily give to the heading when construing the provision?

  1. The heading is decisive and overrides the operative words
  2. The heading must be ignored entirely as it is not enacted law
  3. The heading is part of the statute and may be used as an aid to construction, but does not override clear operative text Correct answer.
  4. The heading is relevant only where the statute is a penal one

Explanation

Headings and marginal notes are part of the statute and may be consulted as contextual aids to resolve ambiguity, but they cannot displace the clear meaning of the operative provision. They inform construction rather than govern it.

Question 13Principles of Statutory Interpretation

Which of the following best describes the function of a long title in statutory interpretation?

  1. It specifies the commencement date of the Act
  2. It lists the penalties for offences under the Act
  3. It contains the definitions binding on the courts
  4. It states the general purpose of the Act and may assist in identifying the mischief the Act addresses Correct answer.

Explanation

The long title describes the general object of the enactment and is a recognised extrinsic-instrument aid for identifying purpose and the mischief targeted. It does not itself create obligations or definitions.

Question 14Principles of Statutory Interpretation

A court is asked to use a parliamentary committee report as an aid to construing an ambiguous provision. Which statement reflects the prevailing common law position?

  1. Such reports are admissible only in constitutional cases
  2. Such reports may be admitted as an aid where the provision is ambiguous, but they cannot displace clear statutory text Correct answer.
  3. Such reports are binding on the court as if they were part of the Act
  4. Such reports are never admissible under any circumstances

Explanation

Extrinsic materials such as committee reports may be consulted to resolve genuine ambiguity or confirm the ordinary meaning, but they remain aids and cannot override unambiguous statutory language. The text retains primacy.

Question 15Principles of Statutory Interpretation

In a statute, the phrase 'means' in a definition provision is typically used to:

  1. Indicate that the term is undefined
  2. Indicate that the term is to be construed by the courts alone
  3. Provide an inclusive definition that adds to the ordinary meaning
  4. Provide an exhaustive definition that replaces the ordinary meaning Correct answer.

Explanation

'Means' signals an exhaustive definition, so the term carries only the stipulated meaning. By contrast, 'includes' signals an inclusive definition that extends rather than replaces the ordinary meaning.

Question 16Principles of Statutory Interpretation

A definition provision states that 'animal includes bird and reptile'. Which conclusion follows?

  1. Only birds and reptiles are animals for the purposes of the Act
  2. The ordinary meaning of 'animal' applies, extended to cover birds and reptiles Correct answer.
  3. Birds and reptiles are excluded from the term 'animal'
  4. The term 'animal' is undefined and must be construed judicially

Explanation

'Includes' introduces an inclusive definition, so the ordinary meaning of 'animal' continues to apply and is extended to capture the listed items. It does not narrow the term to the listed examples.

Question 17Principles of Statutory Interpretation

Which presumption of interpretation concerns whether general words in a statute are taken to bind the state?

  1. The presumption of constitutionality
  2. The presumption against retrospectivity
  3. The presumption that penal provisions are strictly construed
  4. The presumption that statutes do not bind the Crown Correct answer.

Explanation

The presumption that the Crown is not bound by statute unless expressly named or bound by necessary implication governs whether general words reach the state. It is a substantive presumption about the reach of legislation, distinct from the others listed.

Question 18Principles of Statutory Interpretation

A penal statute creates an offence using the phrase 'and other like devices'. A court construing the offence should:

  1. Disregard the phrase as surplusage
  2. Apply the golden rule and rewrite the offence
  3. Read the phrase broadly to maximise the statute's deterrent effect
  4. Apply ejusdem generis and confine the phrase to devices of the same kind as those expressly listed Correct answer.

Explanation

In penal provisions the canon of ejusdem generis operates together with strict construction, so a general phrase following specific examples is confined to the same class. This protects defendants from liability extending to categories the legislature did not clearly identify.

Question 19Principles of Statutory Interpretation

Which maxim distributes the words of a provision to their appropriate referents, so that each word is applied to the subject it naturally fits?

  1. Noscitur a sociis
  2. Ejusdem generis
  3. Expressio unius est exclusio alterius
  4. Reddendo singula singulis Correct answer.

Explanation

Reddendo singula singulis assigns each term to its proper subject, as in a phrase where two subjects and two verbs must be paired correctly. It resolves grammatical distribution rather than the scope of general words or implied exclusions.

Question 20Principles of Statutory Interpretation

A court construes a provision so as to read it consistently with a superior constitutional instrument. Which presumption is operating?

  1. The presumption that the Crown is not bound
  2. The presumption against ousting the jurisdiction of the courts
  3. The presumption against retrospectivity
  4. The presumption of constitutionality Correct answer.

Explanation

The presumption of constitutionality directs courts, where possible, to construe legislation so that it conforms to the constitution rather than invalidating it. The provision is read down to preserve validity rather than struck down as a first resort.

Question 21Principles of Statutory Interpretation

A statutory provision purports to exclude judicial review of a Minister's decision. How does the presumption against ouster of jurisdiction operate?

  1. It converts the ouster clause into a mandatory reconsideration power
  2. It has no application to modern statutes
  3. It requires the clearest words before a court will accept that its supervisory jurisdiction has been excluded Correct answer.
  4. It automatically invalidates the ouster clause in every case

Explanation

The presumption against ouster is a strong canon of construction requiring unmistakable language before a court accepts that its jurisdiction has been removed. Ambiguous ouster clauses are read narrowly to preserve judicial supervision.

Question 22Principles of Statutory Interpretation

Which consideration is most consistent with a court's use of the 'always speaking' principle in statutory interpretation?

  1. Applying the statute only to matters expressly foreseen by the drafter
  2. Ignoring the statutory purpose in favour of the dictionary
  3. Reading general words as accommodating technological and social change where the statutory purpose supports it Correct answer.
  4. Freezing the meaning of words to their meaning at the date of enactment

Explanation

The 'always speaking' principle treats general statutory language as capable of applying to new circumstances, such as emerging technologies, where the purpose of the provision covers them. It permits the statute to operate in changing conditions without requiring constant amendment.

Question 23Principles of Statutory Interpretation

When a court applies the literal rule and the result is clear but produces an outcome the judge considers harsh, the orthodox position is that the court should:

  1. Alter the meaning to achieve a fairer outcome
  2. Refer the matter to a parliamentary committee
  3. Apply the clear meaning and leave reform to the legislature Correct answer.
  4. Declare the provision invalid

Explanation

Under the literal rule the court's function is to apply the enacted words, and harshness of result is a matter for legislative reform rather than judicial amendment. The court cannot substitute its own view of fairness for the plain text.

Question 24Principles of Statutory Interpretation

A statute defines 'night' as 'the period between 9 pm and 6 am' and elsewhere refers to 'night-time entry'. Which principle governs the meaning of 'night-time' in the later provision?

  1. The statutory definition governs, so 'night-time' means the defined period Correct answer.
  2. The term is void for circularity
  3. The definition applies only to the section in which it appears
  4. The ordinary meaning of 'night' prevails over the statutory definition

Explanation

A definition in the interpretation provision applies throughout the Act, so the defined period governs every reference to that term. The ordinary meaning is displaced by the legislative stipulation.

Question 25Principles of Statutory Interpretation

Which of the following best explains why courts treat the presumption against retrospectivity as important in the interpretation of deeds and statutes?

  1. It protects settled transactions and expectations by requiring clear language before a statute alters existing rights Correct answer.
  2. It requires courts to apply the most recent statute in every case
  3. It ensures that all legislation applies uniformly across jurisdictions
  4. It prevents the legislature from enacting any law affecting existing contracts

Explanation

The presumption rests on fairness and certainty: parties who arranged their affairs under existing law should not have those arrangements disturbed without clear legislative language. It therefore demands express or necessarily implied words before a statute reaches backwards.

Question 26Principles of Statutory Interpretation

A statute states that 'the Minister may by order prescribe the fees payable for the inspection of premises'. A court must decide whether the Minister can also prescribe fees for the inspection of vehicles. Which approach best reflects the principle that express mention of one thing excludes another?

  1. The court should apply the always speaking principle and update 'premises' to include vehicles.
  2. The court should apply the principle of legality and require clear words before any fee is imposed.
  3. The court should apply the presumption against implied repeal and hold that the Minister's power is unrestricted.
  4. The court should apply the maxim expressio unius est exclusio alterius and hold that fees for vehicles are excluded. Correct answer.

Explanation

The maxim expressio unius est exclusio alterius provides that the express mention of one matter in a statute may imply the exclusion of others not mentioned. Here, the specific reference to 'premises' suggests that other things, such as vehicles, are not covered. However, the maxim is a guide only and yields to contrary legislative intention.

Question 27Principles of Statutory Interpretation

A statute provides that 'a person who operates a vehicle on a road must hold a valid licence'. The Act defines 'vehicle' to include 'any mechanically propelled vehicle'. A court must determine whether a bicycle is a vehicle for the purposes of the offence. Which interpretive approach is most appropriate?

  1. The court should apply the presumption against penal liability and interpret the provision narrowly.
  2. The court should apply the golden rule and modify the definition to avoid an absurd result.
  3. The court should apply the literal meaning of 'mechanically propelled' and hold that a bicycle is not a vehicle. Correct answer.
  4. The court should apply the mischief rule and consider the problem the Act was designed to address.

Explanation

The definition uses the phrase 'mechanically propelled vehicle', which requires a mechanical source of propulsion. A bicycle is propelled by human pedalling, not by a mechanical engine, so it falls outside the ordinary meaning of the defined term. The literal approach gives effect to the precise words used.

Question 28Principles of Statutory Interpretation

A statute states that 'where a person is convicted of an offence under this Act, the court may order forfeiture of any property used in the commission of the offence'. The offence involves the use of a motor vehicle. Which principle best explains why the court may order forfeiture of the vehicle?

  1. The principle that statutes are presumed not to interfere with property rights without compensation.
  2. The principle that the Crown is not bound by a statute unless expressly named.
  3. The principle that penal provisions are construed strictly in favour of the accused.
  4. The principle that general words are read subject to the context and purpose of the provision. Correct answer.

Explanation

General words such as 'any property' take their meaning from the context and purpose of the provision. Here, the purpose is to remove the instrumentalities of the offence, so a vehicle used in the offence falls within the phrase. The principle is that words are not read in isolation but in light of the surrounding provisions and the statute's object.

Question 29Principles of Statutory Interpretation

A statute provides that 'the Minister may make regulations prescribing the form of applications'. The Minister makes a regulation requiring applications to be submitted online. A court is asked whether the regulation is valid. Which interpretive principle is most relevant?

  1. The principle that the court should defer to the Minister's interpretation of the enabling power.
  2. The principle that subordinate legislation is construed as not exceeding the powers conferred by the enabling Act. Correct answer.
  3. The principle that the regulation must be read subject to the presumption against retrospectivity.
  4. The principle that the Minister's regulations are subject to the same interpretive rules as the Act itself.

Explanation

Subordinate legislation is read as subject to the enabling Act, and a court will not construe a regulation as authorising something beyond the scope of the power conferred. If the Act only permits prescribing the form of applications, a regulation that mandates a particular method of submission may be ultra vires. The principle ensures that delegated powers are not exceeded.

Question 30Principles of Statutory Interpretation

A statute uses the phrase 'the Authority may require a person to produce documents'. The Act's purpose is to ensure compliance with safety standards. A court must decide whether the Authority can require production of documents stored electronically. Which approach is most consistent with the purposive approach?

  1. The court should apply the maxim noscitur a sociis and limit 'documents' to physical papers.
  2. The court should apply the literal meaning of 'documents' and exclude electronic records.
  3. The court should consider the purpose of the Act and interpret 'documents' to include electronic records if that promotes the purpose. Correct answer.
  4. The court should apply the presumption that penal provisions are construed strictly.

Explanation

The purposive approach requires the court to consider the Act's purpose and to interpret words in a way that promotes that purpose. If the purpose is to ensure compliance with safety standards, interpreting 'documents' to include electronic records may be necessary to achieve that object. The literal meaning may be departed from where it would defeat the purpose.

Question 31Principles of Statutory Interpretation

A statute provides that 'a person must not discharge any substance into a waterway'. The Act defines 'substance' as 'any chemical compound or mixture'. A court must decide whether the discharge of heated water (which is not a chemical compound) is prohibited. Which interpretive principle is most relevant?

  1. The principle that the definition of 'substance' is exhaustive and excludes heated water. Correct answer.
  2. The principle that the court should consider the purpose of the Act and interpret 'substance' accordingly.
  3. The principle that the court should apply the presumption against penal liability and narrow the definition.
  4. The principle that the court should apply the always speaking principle to update the definition.

Explanation

The definition of 'substance' is expressed as 'any chemical compound or mixture', which is an exhaustive definition. Heated water is not a chemical compound or mixture, so it falls outside the defined term. The court must apply the definition as given, even if the result may seem inconsistent with the Act's broader purpose.

Question 32Principles of Statutory Interpretation

A statute states that 'no person shall cause unnecessary suffering to an animal'. The Act defines 'animal' as 'any vertebrate other than a human being'. A court must decide whether the provision applies to a cephalopod (such as an octopus), which is an invertebrate. Which conclusion follows from the definition?

  1. The provision does not apply because a cephalopod is not a vertebrate. Correct answer.
  2. The provision applies because the definition is inclusive and not exhaustive.
  3. The provision does not apply because the Act's purpose is limited to domestic animals.
  4. The provision applies because cephalopods are capable of suffering.

Explanation

The definition of 'animal' is 'any vertebrate other than a human being', which is an exhaustive description. A cephalopod is an invertebrate, so it is not a vertebrate and falls outside the definition. The court must give effect to the defined term, even if the result may appear under-inclusive.

Question 33Principles of Statutory Interpretation

A statute provides that 'the Minister may, by notice published in the Gazette, declare a substance to be a prohibited substance'. The Minister publishes a notice declaring 'substance X and any derivative thereof' to be prohibited. A court must decide whether a derivative that is not chemically a substance X is captured. Which interpretive approach is most appropriate?

  1. The court should apply the literal rule and hold that only substance X is prohibited.
  2. The court should apply the purposive approach and consider whether capturing derivatives promotes the Act's purpose. Correct answer.
  3. The court should apply the presumption against retrospectivity and hold that the notice cannot apply to derivatives.
  4. The court should apply the golden rule and modify the notice to avoid absurdity.

Explanation

The purposive approach requires the court to consider the purpose of the Act and the provision, and to interpret the notice in a way that promotes that purpose. If the Act aims to control harmful substances, capturing derivatives may be consistent with that aim. The court will consider the context and purpose, not just the literal words.

Question 34Principles of Statutory Interpretation

A statute provides that 'a person who sells goods by retail must display the price'. The Act defines 'retail' as 'sale to a consumer'. A court must decide whether a sale to a business that will use the goods in its operations is a retail sale. Which interpretive principle is most relevant?

  1. The principle that the definition of 'retail' is inclusive and extends to any sale.
  2. The principle that the court should apply the presumption against penal liability and narrow the definition.
  3. The principle that the court should apply the literal meaning of 'consumer' to exclude businesses.
  4. The principle that the court should consider the purpose of the Act and the context of the definition. Correct answer.

Explanation

The definition of 'retail' as 'sale to a consumer' must be read in the context of the Act and its purpose, which is to ensure price transparency for consumers. Whether a business purchaser is a 'consumer' depends on the statutory context and purpose. The court will consider these factors rather than applying a rigid literal meaning.

Question 35Principles of Statutory Interpretation

A statute provides that 'the Minister may make regulations for the purpose of giving effect to this Act'. The Minister makes a regulation that requires applicants to pay a fee, but the Act contains no express power to impose fees. Which principle is most relevant to determining the validity of the regulation?

  1. The principle that the court should apply the presumption against retrospectivity.
  2. The principle that the Minister's regulations are presumed valid unless proven otherwise.
  3. The principle that the court should apply the always speaking principle to update the Act.
  4. The principle that a general power to make regulations does not authorise the imposition of fees unless expressly or impliedly authorised. Correct answer.

Explanation

A general regulation-making power does not ordinarily authorise the imposition of fees or charges unless the enabling Act expressly or impliedly permits it. The court will construe the power strictly and require clear authority for the imposition of a financial burden. This principle protects against the executive imposing charges without parliamentary sanction.

Question 36Principles of Statutory Interpretation

A statute provides that 'a person must not use a misleading or deceptive mark on goods'. The Act defines 'mark' as 'any word, letter, figure, or symbol'. A court must decide whether a three-dimensional shape (such as a bottle shaped like a fruit) is a 'mark'. Which interpretive principle is most relevant?

  1. The principle that the court should apply the purposive approach to include shapes if they mislead.
  2. The principle that the court should apply the literal meaning of 'mark' to include shapes.
  3. The principle that the definition of 'mark' is exhaustive and excludes shapes. Correct answer.
  4. The principle that the court should apply the maxim ejusdem generis to limit 'mark' to two-dimensional signs.

Explanation

The definition of 'mark' is expressed as 'any word, letter, figure, or symbol', which is an exhaustive list of two-dimensional signs. A three-dimensional shape does not fall within any of those categories. The court must apply the definition as given, even if the shape could mislead consumers.

Question 37Principles of Statutory Interpretation

A statute provides that 'the Minister may make regulations prescribing the manner in which applications are to be made'. The Minister makes a regulation requiring applications to be made in writing and accompanied by a statutory declaration. A court must decide whether the requirement for a statutory declaration is valid. Which principle is most relevant?

  1. The principle that the court should apply the always speaking principle to update the regulation.
  2. The principle that subordinate legislation must not impose substantive obligations beyond the enabling power. Correct answer.
  3. The principle that the court should apply the literal rule to the regulation.
  4. The principle that the court should apply the presumption against retrospectivity.

Explanation

Subordinate legislation is valid only if it falls within the scope of the enabling power. A power to prescribe the manner of applications may authorise procedural requirements, but a requirement for a statutory declaration may be seen as imposing a substantive obligation not authorised by the Act. The court will construe the power strictly.

Question 38Principles of Statutory Interpretation

A statute provides that 'the Minister may make regulations prescribing the fees payable for the inspection of premises'. A court must decide whether the Minister can also prescribe fees for the inspection of vehicles. Which approach best reflects the principle that express mention of one thing excludes another?

  1. The court should apply the always speaking principle and update 'premises' to include vehicles.
  2. The court should apply the maxim expressio unius est exclusio alterius and hold that fees for vehicles are excluded. Correct answer.
  3. The court should apply the presumption against implied repeal and hold that the Minister's power is unrestricted.
  4. The court should apply the principle of legality and require clear words before any fee is imposed.

Explanation

The maxim expressio unius est exclusio alterius provides that the express mention of one matter in a statute may imply the exclusion of others not mentioned. Here, the specific reference to 'premises' suggests that other things, such as vehicles, are not covered. However, the maxim is a guide only and yields to contrary legislative intention.

Question 39Principles of Statutory Interpretation

A deed contains a clause stating that 'the Grantee shall maintain the boundary fence in good repair'. The same deed defines 'Grantee' to include 'the Grantee's successors in title and assigns'. A court must decide whether a later purchaser of the land is bound by the fencing covenant. Which principle of interpretation best explains why the defined term extends the obligation to that purchaser?

  1. The term 'Grantee' must be read down to its ordinary conveyancing meaning because penal burdens are construed strictly against the party relying on them.
  2. The definition operates as an express extension of the term throughout the deed, so 'Grantee' carries the extended meaning wherever it appears unless the context clearly requires otherwise. Correct answer.
  3. The definition is merely descriptive and cannot enlarge the class of persons bound, so the later purchaser takes free of the covenant.
  4. The later purchaser is bound only if the deed is registered, since interpretation of a defined term cannot affect third parties at all.

Explanation

Where an instrument supplies its own definition, that definition governs the meaning of the defined term each time it is used, unless the surrounding context shows a different sense was intended. Because 'Grantee' is defined to include successors in title and assigns, the fencing obligation attaches to a later purchaser who takes the land. The question is one of construction of the deed's own dictionary, not of registration or of strict construction against burdens.

Question 40Principles of Statutory Interpretation

A lease provides that 'the Tenant shall not assign this Lease without the Landlord's consent'. A separate clause states that 'consent shall not be unreasonably withheld'. The Landlord refuses consent because the proposed assignee intends to use the premises for a purpose already permitted by the lease. Applying settled principles of construction to the instrument as a whole, which conclusion is most defensible?

  1. The refusal is valid because the covenant against assignment is absolute and the qualification in the separate clause is too vague to be enforced.
  2. The refusal is likely invalid, because the qualification on consent must be read together with the prohibition so as to give the instrument a coherent operation. Correct answer.
  3. The refusal is valid because a landlord's motive for withholding consent is irrelevant once the assignment clause is expressed as a prohibition.
  4. The refusal is invalid only if the assignee can show the landlord acted in bad faith, since reasonableness is not a justiciable standard.

Explanation

An instrument is construed as a whole, so a qualification on the giving of consent informs the scope of the prohibition on assignment rather than standing apart from it. Reading the two clauses together, consent may be withheld only on grounds that are rational and connected to the landlord's legitimate interests. A refusal resting on a use already permitted by the lease does not meet that standard.

Question 41Rules and Canons of Construction

A deed conveys 'to A and his heirs' under a statute that abolishes the rule in Shelley's case and the doctrine of worthier title but says nothing about words of inheritance. How should the phrase 'and his heirs' be construed?

  1. As words of purchase creating a separate estate in the heirs
  2. As words of limitation that merely describe the estate A takes Correct answer.
  3. As surplusage to be struck from the granting clause
  4. As a condition subsequent divesting A on failure of issue

Explanation

At common law the phrase 'and his heirs' is a word of limitation, not purchase; it marks the estate as a fee simple rather than creating an interest in the named heirs. Abolishing the rule in Shelley's case does not convert words of limitation into words of purchase. The heirs take nothing directly while A lives.

Question 42Rules and Canons of Construction

A statute provides that a notice 'shall be served on the registered proprietor before the expiry of the objection period.' The statute states no consequence for late service. How is the provision best classified?

  1. As creating a criminal offence for late service
  2. As void for uncertainty because no consequence is stated
  3. As mandatory, so that late service invalidates the proceedings
  4. As directory, so that late service does not by itself invalidate the proceedings Correct answer.

Explanation

Where a statute imposes a procedural requirement but attaches no consequence to breach, courts generally treat it as directory. The word 'shall' is not decisive; substance and the purpose of the provision govern. Late service may still be irregular but does not automatically void the proceedings.

Question 43Rules and Canons of Construction

A conveyance uses 'to X for life, then to X's children who survive him.' At the date of the deed X has two children, and a third is later born. Which canon most directly assists in construing when the class closes?

  1. Contemporanea expositio est optima et fortissima in lege Correct answer.
  2. The presumption against intestacy
  3. Expressio unius est exclusio alterius
  4. Noscitur a sociis

Explanation

Contemporanea expositio favours reading ambiguous words in light of the circumstances existing when the instrument was made. For class gifts, that canon supports construing the class by reference to the state of the family at the relevant date. The other canons address lists, associated words, or gaps, not temporal context.

Question 44Rules and Canons of Construction

A statute lists 'boats, barges, lighters, and other vessels.' A dispute arises over whether a floating pontoon falls within 'other vessels.' Which canon governs the scope of the general words?

  1. In pari delicto
  2. Falsa demonstratio non nocet
  3. Expressio unius est exclusio alterius
  4. Ejusdem generis Correct answer.

Explanation

Ejusdem generis confines general words following an enumeration to things of the same kind as the specific items. The pontoon is measured against the common characteristic of the listed craft, namely vessels used for carriage on water. The other canons address omissions, equal fault, or mistaken descriptions.

Question 45Rules and Canons of Construction

A deed describes the land as 'Blackacre, being the parcel conveyed to the grantor by deed dated 3 March 2019.' The parcel number stated is wrong, but the deed of 2019 identifies the land unambiguously. How should the description be construed?

  1. The false particular yields to the true description, and the land identified in the 2019 deed passes Correct answer.
  2. The grantee takes nothing because the description is patent ambiguity
  3. The deed is void because the parcel number is inaccurate
  4. The erroneous parcel number prevails over the reference to the earlier deed

Explanation

Falsa demonstratio non nocet: a mistaken particular does not defeat a description that otherwise identifies the subject matter with certainty. Where the general description is clear and the erroneous detail is surplusage, the true description prevails. The reference to the earlier deed supplies the certain identification.

Question 46Rules and Canons of Construction

Which statement best captures the mischief rule as applied to the interpretation of remedial statutes?

  1. The court identifies the defect the statute was designed to cure and construes the words to suppress it Correct answer.
  2. The court must adopt the most literal reading of the words even if it defeats the remedy
  3. The court may disregard the statutory text whenever the result seems unjust
  4. The court must prefer the interpretation most favourable to the Crown or the State

Explanation

The mischief rule directs attention to the defect or gap the legislature intended to remedy and favours a construction that advances that remedy. It operates within the statutory text, not against it. It is closely related to the modern purposive approach.

Question 47Rules and Canons of Construction

A will contains a printed clause devising 'all my real estate' and a later handwritten clause devising 'my house at 14 Mill Lane.' The handwritten clause is inconsistent with the printed one. Which principle resolves the conflict?

  1. Printed words prevail because they were professionally drafted
  2. The two clauses are void for repugnancy
  3. The earlier clause prevails because it comes first in the document
  4. Handwritten words prevail over inconsistent printed words Correct answer.

Explanation

Where a document mixes printed form language with handwritten additions, the handwritten words are treated as the more deliberate expression of the maker's intention and prevail over inconsistent print. The principle reflects the greater personal involvement of the testator in the manuscript clause.

Question 48Rules and Canons of Construction

A lease grants 'the right to park one vehicle in the rear yard.' The tenant later parks two vehicles. In construing the scope of the grant, which approach is most consistent with the canons?

  1. The grant is void for uncertainty because 'vehicle' is undefined
  2. The court should rewrite the clause to reflect commercial reasonableness
  3. The express mention of one vehicle implies exclusion of more than one Correct answer.
  4. The tenant may park any number of vehicles because the clause is ambiguous

Explanation

Expressio unius est exclusio alterius treats the express specification of one item as impliedly excluding others of the same class. Specifying 'one vehicle' signals that the parties turned their minds to number and fixed a limit. Courts construe rather than rewrite bargains.

Question 49Rules and Canons of Construction

A statute provides that 'no person shall keep a dangerous dog in a dwelling-house.' A dispute arises over a dog kept in a fenced yard attached to a house. Which canon is most apt to resolve whether the yard is within 'dwelling-house'?

  1. Noscitur a sociis Correct answer.
  2. Contra proferentem
  3. Expressio unius est exclusio alterius
  4. The presumption against retrospective operation

Explanation

Noscitur a sociis takes the meaning of a word from the words associated with it. The term 'dwelling-house' is coloured by the residential setting the statute describes, so the court asks whether the yard shares that character. The other canons address different interpretive problems.

Question 50Rules and Canons of Construction

A statute confers a power on a local authority to make by-laws 'for the regulation of markets.' The authority uses the power to ban all street trading in the district. Which principle of construction limits the exercise?

  1. By-laws are immune from judicial construction once confirmed
  2. A statutory power may be exercised in any manner the authority considers expedient
  3. A power conferred for a stated purpose may be exercised only for that purpose Correct answer.
  4. The statute must be read literally even where it produces absurdity

Explanation

Purposive construction confines a statutory power to the objects for which it was granted. A general power to regulate markets does not authorise a blanket prohibition of trade unrelated to market regulation. The court reads the enabling words in light of the stated purpose.