380 Words in 30 Minutes
Daniel is preparing for the writing section: one opinion task of about 250 words in 30 minutes. His last three essays were 360–390 words. The ideas are relevant at the start, but the second body paragraph drifts into a related topic and the conclusion appears only in the final two lines. He plans for five minutes, writes for twenty, and leaves five for checking; he never checks the word count until the end. He has memorised template sentences such as In modern society, this issue has become increasingly controversial and inserts them whether or not they fit. A tutor's profile gives him task response 2/5, coherence 3/5, lexical resource 4/5, and grammatical range 3.5/5. He believes the problem is grammar and wants to spend his remaining two weeks on complex sentences. His handwriting is clear and he types faster than he writes.
1. Given the score profile, what should Daniel change first and why? Include a revised time allocation.
Read the worked answer
Task response is the lowest score and it caps the others: an essay that answers the wrong question cannot be rescued by grammar. The 360–390 word length is not a virtue; it is evidence that he is not selecting. The drifted second paragraph and the buried conclusion are planning failures, not language failures. Lexical resource 4 shows he has the language to express the ideas if the ideas are controlled.
A revised allocation for 30 minutes is seven minutes planning, eighteen minutes writing, and five minutes checking. During planning he should write the thesis first and test each planned paragraph against it. The thesis should name his position and the two reasons, so the second paragraph has a fixed job. He should stop inserting template sentences unless they serve the prompt, and he should check the word count at minute 18, not at the end. Complex sentences can wait; the remaining two weeks are better spent on relevance and paragraph control.
2. At minute 20 he realises his second body paragraph has drifted off-topic. What repair is best with ten minutes left?
Read the worked answer
He should not erase the paragraph. The best repair is a relevance bridge plus a rewritten topic sentence, and if needed two or three replacement sentences. The procedure is: stop, reread the thesis, and decide whether the paragraph's example can be reframed to support it. If it can, write a new topic sentence that names the link and keep the example. If it cannot, delete the example sentences and write two sentences that do support the thesis, then add a two-sentence conclusion.
With ten minutes this is feasible only if he writes the conclusion in the last three minutes. The error to avoid is continuing to write more off-topic text in order to finish the paragraph. Coherence rewards a visible line of argument, not volume. He should also avoid introducing a new idea at this stage, because a new idea without development will lower coherence further.
3. Should he keep memorised templates for the exam? Evaluate the trade-off.
Read the worked answer
Templates are useful only when they encode structure rather than content. A memorised sentence such as In modern society adds words without evidence and often signals a generic answer; an examiner sees it as irrelevant prefabrication. However, a structural frame such as thesis, reason, example, qualification, conclusion is not a template and does not risk relevance.
Daniel should keep a short list of linking devices and a paragraph frame, and drop ready-made opening sentences unless he adapts them to the exact prompt. The test is substitution: if the sentence could appear unchanged in an essay on a different topic, it is probably costing more than it gives. He can practise by writing three different openings to the same prompt and choosing the most specific. This preserves the time-saving benefit of a frame while forcing him to engage with the question, which is exactly where his score is weakest.