Wada Test in a Left-Handed Epilepsy Surgical Candidate
A 24-year-old left-handed woman with medically refractory focal epilepsy is evaluated for temporal lobectomy. MRI shows a left temporal lesion. The Wada test is performed: sodium amobarbital injection into the left internal carotid artery produces right hemiparesis and no speech arrest; injection into the right internal carotid produces left hemiparesis and transient global aphasia lasting 6 minutes. A baseline neuropsychological exam shows verbal memory scores in the low average range and visuospatial memory scores below the 5th percentile. The surgical team proposes a left temporal resection. The patient asks whether her language will be affected. She is left-handed for writing but uses her right hand for most other activities; her family history is unremarkable. The epileptologist notes that her seizures began at age 12 and have been resistant to three antiepileptic drugs.
1. Which hemisphere is language-dominant, and what is the evidence? What does this mean for the proposed left temporal resection?
Read the worked answer
Reasoning: The right hemisphere is language-dominant. The left injection produced right hemiparesis, confirming that the drug reached the left hemisphere and its motor cortex; yet it produced no speech arrest. The right injection produced left hemiparesis and transient global aphasia, localizing language to the right hemisphere. In a left-handed patient this atypical pattern is uncommon but well documented. For a left temporal resection, the main language risk is lower than in a typical left-dominant patient, but not zero: atypical dominance can be partial or bilateral, and the Wada test samples only a limited dose and time window. The team should still map language with fMRI or electrocortical stimulation if the resection margin is close to cortex, and should counsel that verbal memory-not just language-may be affected because the left temporal lobe can support verbal memory even when language is right-lateralized.
2. If the left injection had also produced brief speech arrest, how would your interpretation change? What additional data would you seek?
Read the worked answer
Reasoning: A left-injection speech arrest would raise the possibility of bilateral language representation, but it could also be a false-positive from drug cross-flow, sedation, or a transient confusional effect. I would not immediately switch to 'bilateral dominance.' I would check the injection order, dose, and angiographic evidence of cross-circulation; repeat the test with a lower dose or superselective injection; and compare the timing and quality of the language arrest with the right-sided result. I would also seek fMRI language lateralization and, if surgery is planned, extraoperative cortical stimulation mapping. The decision rule is not 'any speech arrest equals dominance' but whether the arrest is reliable, dose-dependent, and anatomically consistent.
3. The visuospatial memory deficit is below the 5th percentile. How does this affect surgical planning if the right hemisphere is language-dominant?
Read the worked answer
Reasoning: The visuospatial memory deficit suggests the right temporal lobe is already dysfunctional or that the left lesion has disrupted right-sided networks. If the right hemisphere is language-dominant, the right temporal lobe may also be the more important substrate for visuospatial memory; resecting the left side is less likely to cause a new language deficit but may not improve visuospatial memory. The team should use Wada memory testing-injecting each hemisphere and testing memory-to estimate reserve. If the right side is doing the memory work, a left resection may be relatively safe for memory, but the patient should be warned that visuospatial memory may remain impaired. If the right side is at risk, surgical strategy should shift toward a more tailored resection.