I85PREP
⌘ K
OAGB Bar Final Assessment study materials
OAGB Bar Final Assessment study resources

OAGB Bar Final Assessment practice questions

One question at a time. Build your OAGB Bar Final Assessment understanding.

First 50 of 200 questions. Each one lists the choices, the correct answer, and an explanation. The checker at the top of this page saves progress in this browser when it is available.

Continue in the practice tool above to load more questions, 50 at a time.

Question 1Civil Procedure

Under the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, a defendant generally must file a responsive pleading within how many days after being served with the summons and complaint?

  1. 60 days
  2. 21 days Correct answer.
  3. 14 days
  4. 30 days

Explanation

Rule 12(a)(1)(A)(i) sets a 21-day period after service of the summons and complaint for the defendant to serve a responsive pleading. The period runs from service, not from the filing of the complaint.

Question 2Civil Procedure

A plaintiff wishes to serve an individual defendant in a federal action. Which method of service is expressly authorized by Rule 4(e)(2)?

  1. Sending the complaint by ordinary first-class mail
  2. Publishing notice in a newspaper of general circulation
  3. Leaving a copy at the defendant's dwelling with a person of suitable age and discretion who resides there Correct answer.
  4. Posting the complaint on the defendant's front door

Explanation

Rule 4(e)(2)(B) authorizes leaving a copy at the individual's dwelling or usual abode with a resident of suitable age and discretion. The other listed methods are not among the federal statutory options absent state-law authorization.

Question 3Civil Procedure

What is the effect of a defendant's voluntary appearance in the action without raising a defense of insufficient service of process?

  1. Service becomes void
  2. The defense of insufficient service is waived Correct answer.
  3. The court must still inquire into service
  4. The defense is preserved for appeal

Explanation

Under Rule 12(h)(1), a defense of insufficient service of process is waived if not raised in a Rule 12 motion or in the answer. A voluntary appearance that omits the defense forfeits it.

Question 4Civil Procedure

A plaintiff files a complaint in federal court invoking diversity jurisdiction. Which pleading standard governs whether the complaint states a claim?

  1. The complaint must contain a short and plain statement showing entitlement to relief Correct answer.
  2. The complaint must recite detailed evidence supporting each element
  3. The complaint must be verified under oath
  4. The complaint must attach all documents relied upon

Explanation

Rule 8(a)(2) requires only a short and plain statement of the claim showing the pleader is entitled to relief. Detailed evidentiary support is not required at the pleading stage.

Question 5Civil Procedure

Which discovery device is used to obtain sworn testimony from a party before trial?

  1. Request for admission
  2. Request for production
  3. Deposition Correct answer.
  4. Interrogatory

Explanation

A deposition under Rule 30 involves oral examination under oath and is transcribed. Interrogatories and requests for admission are written devices, and requests for production seek documents.

Question 6Civil Procedure

Under Rule 26(b)(1), the scope of discovery generally extends to matter that is:

  1. Admissible at trial
  2. Relevant solely to the plaintiff's claims
  3. Relevant to any party's claim or defense and proportional to the needs of the case Correct answer.
  4. Limited to documents the opposing party has already produced

Explanation

Rule 26(b)(1) permits discovery of nonprivileged matter relevant to any party's claim or defense and proportional to the needs of the case. Relevance for discovery is broader than admissibility at trial.

Question 7Civil Procedure

A party who fails to respond to a properly served interrogatory may face which sanction?

  1. Referral to a magistrate judge for criminal prosecution
  2. Automatic entry of default judgment
  3. Immediate contempt of court without any motion
  4. An order compelling discovery and possible costs or dismissal Correct answer.

Explanation

Rule 37 authorizes a motion to compel and, if the failure persists, sanctions that may include costs, preclusion, or dismissal. Sanctions are not automatic and require a court order.

Question 8Civil Procedure

What is the primary purpose of the pretrial conference under Rule 16?

  1. To serve as the final appealable order
  2. To conduct the trial on the merits
  3. To streamline the proceedings and formulate a plan for trial Correct answer.
  4. To replace the need for discovery

Explanation

Rule 16 authorizes pretrial conferences to expedite disposition, establish control, discourage wasteful pretrial activity, and facilitate settlement. It is a management device, not a trial or appealable order.

Question 9Civil Procedure

A defendant moves to dismiss for failure to state a claim under Rule 12(b)(6) and the court grants the motion with leave to amend. What is the effect of the order?

  1. The plaintiff must appeal immediately
  2. The plaintiff may file an amended complaint within the time set by the court Correct answer.
  3. The defendant must answer the original complaint
  4. The case is dismissed with prejudice automatically

Explanation

A dismissal with leave to amend permits the plaintiff to cure the defect by filing an amended complaint within the time allowed. The dismissal is not final until the opportunity to amend is exhausted.

Question 10Civil Procedure

A plaintiff serves a complaint and the defendant responds with an answer that asserts a counterclaim arising from the same transaction. The plaintiff believes the counterclaim is legally insufficient. What procedural step is available?

  1. Seek default judgment on the counterclaim
  2. Move to dismiss the counterclaim under Rule 12(b)(6) Correct answer.
  3. Move for summary judgment immediately
  4. File a reply denying the counterclaim and nothing more

Explanation

A counterclaim is a pleading subject to Rule 12(b) defenses, so a party may move to dismiss it for failure to state a claim. A reply denying allegations does not test legal sufficiency.

Question 11Civil Procedure

A party seeks discovery of documents protected by the attorney-client privilege. The requesting party argues the privilege was waived because the documents were shared with an accountant. Which principle governs?

  1. Privilege may be waived by voluntary disclosure to third parties who are not necessary to the legal representation Correct answer.
  2. Privilege applies only to documents created after litigation begins
  3. Privilege is determined solely by the requesting party's need
  4. Privilege is absolute and can never be waived

Explanation

Voluntary disclosure to third parties generally waives privilege unless the third party is necessary to facilitate legal services. The court balances confidentiality against the need for disclosure.

Question 12Civil Procedure

A defendant fails to appear after proper service. The plaintiff seeks default judgment. Which statement about entry of default and default judgment is accurate?

  1. Default judgment is unavailable in federal court
  2. The clerk may enter default, but default judgment generally requires a court order Correct answer.
  3. Default may be entered only after a hearing on the merits
  4. Default judgment is entered automatically by the clerk in all cases

Explanation

Under Rule 55, the clerk enters default when a party has failed to plead or defend. Default judgment then ordinarily requires application to the court, with exceptions for certain sum-certain cases.

Question 13Civil Procedure

A plaintiff wishes to amend the complaint to add a new claim after the defendant has answered. What is the general rule under Rule 15(a)?

  1. Amendment requires the opposing party's consent in all cases
  2. A party may amend once as a matter of course within 21 days after service of a responsive pleading Correct answer.
  3. Amendment is permitted only with leave of the appellate court
  4. Amendment is never permitted after an answer is filed

Explanation

Rule 15(a)(1) allows one amendment as of right within 21 days after service of a responsive pleading or motion. After that period, amendment requires consent or leave of court, which is freely given when justice so requires.

Question 14Civil Procedure

A defendant believes the plaintiff's chosen venue is improper. Which motion is the proper vehicle to challenge venue?

  1. A motion to strike the complaint
  2. A motion for change of judge
  3. A motion to dismiss for improper venue under Rule 12(b)(3) Correct answer.
  4. A motion for a more definite statement

Explanation

Rule 12(b)(3) authorizes a motion to dismiss for improper venue. A motion to strike and a motion for a more definite statement address pleading defects, not venue.

Question 15Civil Procedure

A plaintiff files suit in federal court based on diversity. The defendant is a citizen of the same state as the plaintiff. What is the consequence for subject-matter jurisdiction?

  1. Diversity jurisdiction exists because the amount in controversy is sufficient
  2. Diversity jurisdiction exists because the defendant resides in the forum state
  3. Diversity jurisdiction is lacking because complete diversity is required Correct answer.
  4. Diversity jurisdiction exists if the claim arises under federal law

Explanation

Diversity jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1332 requires complete diversity, meaning no plaintiff shares citizenship with any defendant. A shared citizenship defeats diversity regardless of the amount in controversy.

Question 16Civil Procedure

A party receives a request for production of documents and objects on grounds of undue burden. What must the objecting party generally do?

  1. Ignore the request until the court rules
  2. State the objection with specificity and produce responsive, non-objectionable materials Correct answer.
  3. Destroy the documents to avoid production
  4. Produce all documents without objection

Explanation

Rule 34(b)(2) requires objections to be stated with specificity and requires production of responsive materials that are not subject to objection. Boilerplate objections and blanket refusal are improper.

Question 17Civil Procedure

A plaintiff seeks to compel a nonparty's testimony at trial. Which device is used to secure the attendance of a nonparty witness?

  1. A request for admission
  2. A subpoena issued under Rule 45 Correct answer.
  3. A notice of deposition only
  4. An interrogatory

Explanation

Rule 45 authorizes subpoenas to command a nonparty to attend trial or a hearing and produce documents. Interrogatories and requests for admission are directed to parties.

Question 18Civil Procedure

A defendant raises the defense of lack of personal jurisdiction in a Rule 12(b)(2) motion. The motion is denied. When must the defendant raise the defense again to avoid waiver?

  1. By a second motion filed within ten days
  2. On appeal only, because the motion preserved it
  3. In the answer, because the defense is waived if omitted from the responsive pleading Correct answer.
  4. Never, because the denial conclusively establishes jurisdiction

Explanation

Under Rule 12(h)(1), a party waives defenses of personal jurisdiction and venue by omitting them from a Rule 12 motion or responsive pleading. Raising the defense in a denied motion does not eliminate the need to reassert it in the answer.

Question 19Civil Procedure

A plaintiff moves for summary judgment under Rule 56. Which showing is required?

  1. The court's preliminary view that the plaintiff will likely win
  2. No genuine dispute of material fact and entitlement to judgment as a matter of law Correct answer.
  3. The opposing party's failure to respond to discovery
  4. A preponderance of the evidence presented at a hearing

Explanation

Rule 56(a) permits summary judgment only when there is no genuine dispute as to any material fact and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law. The court views the record in the light most favorable to the nonmovant.

Question 20Civil Procedure

During trial, a party seeks to introduce a document that was not disclosed during discovery. The opposing party objects. What is the court's likely approach?

  1. Declare a mistrial in all cases
  2. Exclude the evidence unless the failure to disclose was substantially justified or harmless Correct answer.
  3. Admit the evidence automatically because trial evidence is unrestricted
  4. Refer the matter for criminal contempt

Explanation

Rule 37(c)(1) bars use of undisclosed information at trial unless the failure was substantially justified or harmless. The court may also impose lesser sanctions.

Question 21Civil Procedure

A plaintiff asserts a claim that is barred by the statute of limitations. The defendant does not raise the defense in the answer. What is the general consequence in federal court?

  1. The defense is waived if not raised in the responsive pleading Correct answer.
  2. The claim is dismissed with prejudice regardless of waiver
  3. The defense is preserved automatically for appeal
  4. The court must dismiss sua sponte in all cases

Explanation

A statute of limitations defense is an affirmative defense under Rule 8(c) and is waived if not raised in the answer. Unlike subject-matter jurisdiction, it is not a nonwaivable defect.

Question 22Civil Procedure

A court considers a motion to dismiss for lack of subject-matter jurisdiction under Rule 12(b)(1). Which statement best describes the court's authority?

  1. The court may not consider the motion after the answer is filed
  2. The court must accept all jurisdictional allegations as true without inquiry
  3. The court must transfer the case to state court
  4. The court may consider evidence outside the pleadings and must dismiss if jurisdiction is absent Correct answer.

Explanation

Subject-matter jurisdiction may be challenged at any time, and the court may look beyond the pleadings to resolve factual disputes about jurisdiction. If jurisdiction is lacking, dismissal is required.

Question 23Civil Procedure

A defendant removes a case from state court. The plaintiff argues the removal was procedurally defective because the defendant did not obtain the consent of a co-defendant. When is consent of all defendants generally required for removal?

  1. Only when the plaintiff consents
  2. Only when the case involves a federal question
  3. When multiple defendants are properly joined and all must join in the notice of removal Correct answer.
  4. Never, because each defendant may remove independently

Explanation

Under 28 U.S.C. § 1446(b)(2)(A), all defendants who have been properly joined and served must join in or consent to removal. The rule of unanimity applies to properly joined defendants.

Question 24Civil Procedure

A party seeks to enforce a settlement agreement reached during litigation, but the other party disputes its terms. What is the court's general approach?

  1. The court must always conduct a full trial on the settlement
  2. The agreement is automatically void if disputed
  3. The court lacks authority to enforce settlement agreements
  4. The court may enforce the agreement if the terms are clear and the parties consented to its entry Correct answer.

Explanation

Courts may enforce clear settlement agreements, often by entering judgment on the agreement when the parties have consented. Disputes over material terms may require further proceedings.

Question 25Civil Procedure

A plaintiff seeks to add a new party after the statute of limitations has run. Which doctrine may allow the claim to relate back to the original filing?

  1. Rule 15(c) relation back when the new party had notice and would not be prejudiced Correct answer.
  2. Rule 55 default judgment
  3. Rule 26(f) discovery conference
  4. Rule 12(b)(6) dismissal with prejudice

Explanation

Rule 15(c)(1)(C) permits relation back when the new party received notice of the action within the period for service and knew or should have known the action would have been brought against it but for a mistake. Relation back preserves the claim despite the limitations period.

Question 26Civil Procedure

Under the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, how many days after service of the summons and complaint does a defendant generally have to file an answer when formal service is made within the United States?

  1. 30 days
  2. 60 days
  3. 14 days
  4. 21 days Correct answer.

Explanation

Rule 12(a)(1)(A)(i) gives a defendant 21 days after being served with the summons and complaint to serve a responsive pleading. The 60-day period applies only when service is waived under Rule 4(d). The shorter 14-day period applies to a reply to an answer, not to an original answer.

Question 27Civil Procedure

A plaintiff files a complaint in federal court and serves the defendant. The defendant responds by serving an answer that includes a permissive counterclaim. Within what period must the plaintiff serve a reply to that counterclaim?

  1. No reply is required unless the court orders one
  2. Within 14 days after being served with the answer
  3. Within 21 days after being served with the answer Correct answer.
  4. Within 30 days after being served with the answer

Explanation

Under Rule 12(a)(1)(C), a plaintiff must serve a reply to a counterclaim within 21 days after being served with the answer that contains it. A reply is required only when the answer states a counterclaim; otherwise no reply is needed. The 21-day period mirrors the general answer deadline.

Question 28Civil Procedure

A defendant files a Rule 12(b)(6) motion to dismiss for failure to state a claim. Rather than rule immediately, the court wishes to consider matters outside the pleadings that the parties have submitted. If the court does not exclude those materials, how must it treat the motion?

  1. As a motion for judgment on the pleadings under Rule 12(c)
  2. As a motion to strike under Rule 12(f)
  3. As a motion for summary judgment under Rule 56 Correct answer.
  4. As a motion for a more definite statement under Rule 12(e)

Explanation

Under Rule 12(d), if on a Rule 12(b)(6) motion the court considers matters outside the pleadings and does not exclude them, the motion must be treated as one for summary judgment under Rule 56. All parties must then be given a reasonable opportunity to present materials pertinent to summary judgment. The conversion ensures the nonmovant receives notice and an opportunity to respond with evidence.

Question 29Constitutional Law

Which Article of the Constitution establishes the Supreme Court and vests the judicial power of the United States in it?

  1. Article I
  2. Article IV
  3. Article II
  4. Article III Correct answer.

Explanation

Article III creates the federal judiciary, stating that the judicial power of the United States shall be vested in one Supreme Court and in such inferior courts as Congress may establish. Articles I and II address the legislative and executive branches respectively.

Question 30Constitutional Law

The doctrine of judicial review, allowing courts to invalidate acts of Congress that conflict with the Constitution, was established in which case?

  1. Barron v. Baltimore
  2. Marbury v. Madison Correct answer.
  3. Gibbons v. Ogden
  4. McCulloch v. Maryland

Explanation

Marbury v. Madison (1803) held that a law repugnant to the Constitution is void and that courts have the duty to say what the law is, thereby establishing judicial review. The other cases concern implied powers, the commerce power, and the non-application of the Bill of Rights to states.

Question 31Constitutional Law

Under the Necessary and Proper Clause, Congress may enact legislation that is not expressly enumerated so long as the law is a means reasonably adapted to executing an enumerated power. Which case announced this principle?

  1. Printz v. United States
  2. New York v. United States
  3. United States v. Lopez
  4. McCulloch v. Maryland Correct answer.

Explanation

McCulloch v. Maryland (1819) held that Congress may use any appropriate means to carry out its enumerated powers, provided the end is legitimate and the means are plainly adapted to that end and not prohibited. The other cases concern limits on the commerce power and anti-commandeering.

Question 32Constitutional Law

Which clause of the Constitution provides that federal law is the supreme law of the land, binding state judges notwithstanding contrary state law?

  1. The Full Faith and Credit Clause
  2. The Privileges and Immunities Clause
  3. The Supremacy Clause Correct answer.
  4. The Commerce Clause

Explanation

The Supremacy Clause in Article VI makes the Constitution, federal statutes, and treaties the supreme law of the land, prevailing over conflicting state law. It is the textual basis for federal preemption.

Question 33Constitutional Law

A state enacts a tax on all imported goods sold within the state, applying the same rate to in-state and out-of-state products. A business challenges the tax under the Import-Export Clause. What is the most likely outcome?

  1. The tax is invalid only if it exceeds the federal tariff rate.
  2. The tax is valid because it applies equally to all goods.
  3. The tax is invalid because states may not lay imposts or duties on imports or exports without congressional consent. Correct answer.
  4. The tax is valid because it is a neutral revenue measure.

Explanation

Article I bars states from laying imposts or duties on imports or exports absent congressional consent. A flat tax on imported goods falls within that prohibition regardless of even-handed application.

Question 34Constitutional Law

Congress passes a statute requiring state executive officers to conduct background checks on all handgun purchasers. A state refuses to comply. Under prevailing doctrine, the statute is most likely:

  1. Valid, because the Necessary and Proper Clause authorizes any means to enforce federal law
  2. Valid, because the Supremacy Clause compels state officers to execute federal statutes
  3. Invalid, because Congress lacks any authority to regulate firearms
  4. Invalid, because Congress may not commandeer state executive officers to administer a federal program Correct answer.

Explanation

Printz v. United States held that Congress cannot commandeer state executive officials to carry out federal duties; the federal government must use its own officers. The Necessary and Proper Clause does not override this structural limit.

Question 35Constitutional Law

Which case held that the power to regulate interstate commerce includes the power to regulate intrastate activities that substantially affect interstate commerce?

  1. United States v. Morrison
  2. United States v. Lopez
  3. National Federation of Independent Business v. Sebelius
  4. Wickard v. Filburn Correct answer.

Explanation

Wickard v. Filburn established that even local activity, taken in the aggregate, may be regulated if it substantially affects interstate commerce. Morrison and Lopez narrowed the doctrine by rejecting aggregation in those contexts.

Question 36Constitutional Law

In United States v. Lopez, the Supreme Court struck down the Gun-Free School Zones Act primarily because the regulated activity was not economic and lacked which element?

  1. A congressional finding of fiscal impact
  2. State consent to the regulation
  3. A treaty implementing the regulation
  4. A jurisdictional element tying the conduct to interstate commerce Correct answer.

Explanation

Lopez emphasized that the statute contained no jurisdictional element ensuring the firearm possession affected interstate commerce, and the Court declined to infer a substantial effect. This failure was central to the holding.

Question 37Constitutional Law

The Dormant Commerce Clause doctrine primarily limits:

  1. Congress's power to regulate interstate commerce
  2. The President's power to enter trade agreements
  3. Federal taxation of interstate carriers
  4. State laws that discriminate against or unduly burden interstate commerce Correct answer.

Explanation

The Dormant Commerce Clause is a judicial doctrine restricting state laws that discriminate against out-of-state economic interests or impose undue burdens on interstate commerce, even absent federal legislation. It limits states, not Congress.

Question 38Constitutional Law

A state law requires all milk sold in the state to be pasteurized at in-state facilities, effectively excluding out-of-state producers. Under the Dormant Commerce Clause, the law is most likely:

  1. Valid, because it protects public health
  2. Invalid, because states may never regulate food safety
  3. Invalid, because it discriminates against interstate commerce and no legitimate local purpose justifies it Correct answer.
  4. Valid, because milk is a local commodity

Explanation

A facially discriminatory law favoring in-state economic interests is virtually per se invalid unless the state can show a legitimate local purpose that cannot be served by reasonable nondiscriminatory alternatives. Protecting health does not justify economic protectionism.

Question 39Constitutional Law

The Privileges or Immunities Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment was substantially narrowed by which decision, which held it did not make the Bill of Rights applicable to the states?

  1. Gitlow v. New York
  2. Slaughter-House Cases Correct answer.
  3. McDonald v. Chicago
  4. Duncan v. Louisiana

Explanation

The Slaughter-House Cases (1873) read the Privileges or Immunities Clause narrowly, confining it to national citizenship rights and rejecting its use to apply the Bill of Rights to states. Later incorporation occurred through the Due Process Clause.

Question 40Constitutional Law

Under the incorporation doctrine, most provisions of the Bill of Rights apply to the states through which constitutional provision?

  1. The Commerce Clause
  2. The Contracts Clause
  3. The Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment Correct answer.
  4. The Equal Protection Clause

Explanation

Selective incorporation applies most Bill of Rights guarantees to the states through the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment. The Court has incorporated rights deemed fundamental to ordered liberty.

Question 41Constitutional Law

A city ordinance prohibits all signs on residential property except those identifying the owner's name and address. A homeowner wishes to post a sign protesting a local policy. The ordinance is most likely:

  1. Invalid, because it is a content-based restriction that fails strict scrutiny Correct answer.
  2. Valid, because it applies equally to all residents
  3. Valid, because residential aesthetics are a compelling interest
  4. Invalid, because all sign ordinances are unconstitutional

Explanation

An ordinance permitting only certain content (owner identification) while banning protest signs is content-based and subject to strict scrutiny, which it cannot satisfy. Aesthetics are not a compelling interest justifying such discrimination.

Question 42Constitutional Law

Which standard of review applies to content-neutral time, place, and manner restrictions on speech in a public forum?

  1. Absolute deference to the legislature
  2. Rational basis review
  3. Strict scrutiny
  4. Intermediate scrutiny: narrowly tailored to a significant government interest, leaving open ample alternatives Correct answer.

Explanation

Content-neutral time, place, and manner regulations are valid if they serve a significant government interest, are narrowly tailored, and leave open ample alternative channels of communication. This is intermediate scrutiny.

Question 43Constitutional Law

The Establishment Clause is most commonly analyzed under the test asking whether a law has a secular purpose, has a primary effect that neither advances nor inhibits religion, and avoids excessive entanglement. This is known as the:

  1. Strict scrutiny test
  2. O'Brien test
  3. Lemon test Correct answer.
  4. Brandenburg test

Explanation

The Lemon test derives from Lemon v. Kurtzman and assesses purpose, effect, and entanglement. It remains a reference point, though the Court has applied it inconsistently in recent years.

Question 44Constitutional Law

A state university denies recognition and funding to a student religious group because the group requires its leaders to share its faith. Under current doctrine, this denial is most likely:

  1. Valid, because the state must avoid entanglement with religion
  2. Valid, because funding decisions are unreviewable
  3. Invalid, because all student groups must receive equal funding regardless of any criteria
  4. Invalid, because it discriminates against religious speech in a limited public forum Correct answer.

Explanation

Viewpoint discrimination against religious groups in a limited public forum violates free speech; a state may not deny benefits because of a group's religious viewpoint. The Court has protected religious student groups' ability to select leaders consistent with their beliefs.

Question 45Constitutional Law

The Free Exercise Clause, as applied in Employment Division v. Smith, generally does not require exemptions from:

  1. Laws that discriminate against a particular denomination
  2. Laws that target religious practice for special burdens
  3. Statutes passed by Congress
  4. Neutral laws of general applicability Correct answer.

Explanation

Smith held that neutral, generally applicable laws may be applied to religious practices without a compelling interest showing. Laws that target religion or discriminate among denominations receive strict scrutiny.

Question 46Constitutional Law

Under the Equal Protection Clause, a state law classifying persons by race is subject to which standard of review?

  1. Intermediate scrutiny
  2. Rational basis
  3. No review, because states may classify as they wish
  4. Strict scrutiny Correct answer.

Explanation

Racial classifications are suspect and subject to strict scrutiny, requiring a compelling government interest and narrow tailoring. This applies to laws disadvantaging and, in many contexts, benefiting racial groups.

Question 47Constitutional Law

A state law provides that only men may serve as administrators of estates. Applying equal protection doctrine, a court would most likely review the law under:

  1. No scrutiny, because probate is a matter of state law
  2. Intermediate scrutiny, because it classifies by sex Correct answer.
  3. Strict scrutiny, because it involves a fundamental right
  4. Rational basis, because estate administration is economic

Explanation

Sex-based classifications receive intermediate scrutiny and must serve an important governmental objective through substantially related means. Estate administration is not a fundamental right triggering strict scrutiny.

Question 48Constitutional Law

Which standard applies to equal protection challenges involving sexual orientation classifications in cases where the Court has applied heightened review?

  1. Rational basis only, in all circumstances
  2. No review, because the Court has declined to address the issue
  3. Intermediate scrutiny, treating sexual orientation as a quasi-suspect classification Correct answer.
  4. Strict scrutiny in all cases

Explanation

In cases such as Windsor and Obergefell, the Court applied heightened scrutiny akin to intermediate review to sexual orientation classifications, though it has not formally designated them suspect. Rational basis remains insufficient where animus is the motive.

Question 49Constitutional Law

The doctrine of standing requires a plaintiff to show an injury in fact that is concrete and particularized, causation, and:

  1. That Congress has authorized the suit by statute
  2. That the injury is shared by all citizens
  3. Redressability through a favorable court decision Correct answer.
  4. That the defendant acted in bad faith

Explanation

Article III standing requires injury in fact, causation, and redressability. A generalized grievance shared by all citizens generally does not confer standing.

Question 50Constitutional Law

A plaintiff sues to challenge a federal statute, but the injury she alleges is a generalized grievance shared equally by all taxpayers. Under Article III, the suit is most likely:

  1. Permissible, because taxpayers always have standing to challenge spending
  2. Impermissible, because a generalized grievance does not constitute injury in fact Correct answer.
  3. Permissible, because the statute involves federal funds
  4. Impermissible, because only states may challenge federal statutes

Explanation

Standing requires a concrete, particularized injury; a generalized grievance shared by the public does not suffice. Taxpayer standing is narrowly limited to specific Establishment Clause challenges to congressional spending.